Abraham Nunez's Splits
Yesterday's Abraham Nunez signing would not be a bad one if it were a spring training minor league invite or even a cheap one year deal. However, for the next two years the Phillies are going to pay over $3M to Nunez in reaction to three months of his 9 year career. Check out this comparison:
| BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | AB | K | BB | |
| pre 2005 | 0.238 | 0.306 | 0.316 | 0.622 | 1489 | 278 | 142 |
| 2005 - Part 1 | 0.240 | 0.289 | 0.275 | 0.564 | 225 | 41 | 15 |
| 2005 - Part 2 | 0.337 | 0.404 | 0.459 | 0.863 | 196 | 22 | 22 |
Obviously, the pre-2005 row includes Nunez's stats before this past year. The 2005 Part 1 row, very similar to the pre-2005 row, shows his combined stats for April through May 1 of this year and August 1 through the end of the year. The 2005 Part 2 row shows his stats from May 2 through July 31.
So, basically, for about 200 at-bats over three months in the middle of 2005 he produced at an .863 OPS clip and had a great batting eye. However, for the 1700 at-bats and 8.5 years that constitute the rest of his career, including the rest of 2005, he has been a terrible hitter, batting around .240, getting on base only about 30% of the time (with an awful batting eye), and slugging a terrible .300.
Clearly, this is not production you reward with more than three million guaranteed dollars over two years.
[editor's note, by Alex Falzone]So much for the platoon split. Here's a table for Nunez's 2005 splits, both post All-Star Break and vs. righties and lefties. (n.b. I had to add this here because the comment field wouldn't take my table.)
| Split | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | AB | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 - whole season | .285 | .343 | .361 | .704 | 421 | 37 | 63 |
| 2005 - vs. RHP | .277 | .331 | .354 | .685 | 347 | 28 | 54 |
| 2005 - vs. LHP | .324 | .398 | .392 | .790 | 74 | 9 | 9 |
| 2005 - post AS Break | .278 | .335 | .335 | .670 | 248 | 21 | 45 |
| 2005 - post AS Break vs. RHP | .266 | .318 | .332 | .650 | 199 | 15 | 40 |
| 2005 - post AS Break vs. LHP | .327 | .400 | .347 | .747 | 49 | 6 | 5 |
Update [2005-11-30 13:39:34 by Alex Falzone]:Here's the good news though. From 2002-2004, which is as far back as I could find splits for, he fared better against RHP's than against LHP's.
| Split | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS | AB | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-2004 | .263 | .318 | .351 | .669 | 914 | 73 | 152 |
| 2002-2004 vs. RHP | .265 | .314 | .361 | .675 | 778 | 56 | 129 |
| 2002-2004 vs. LHP | .250 | .340 | .294 | .634 | 136 | 17 | 23 |
So maybe it's not as bad as it looks. Of course, a .650-.700 OPS guy with no power isn't what most of us phans were hoping for as a platoon with Bell. But if he is going to spell Bell against RHP's, at least he has more power batting RH than he does batting LH, although his BB/K rate is substantially higher batting LH.
0 recs |
1 comment
Comments
about spelling Bell
I hope steagles is on the right track. Maybe we're hoping Nunez stays hot for two months and we flip him to, uh, somebody, Washington maybe, and then we bring up our star infield prospect, ______.
Oh, my bad, we don't have any such prospects, do we....
by The Navigator on Dec 1, 2005 6:29 PM EST reply actions 0 recs




















