The Good Phight: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


spread the word

Some Thoughts After Phillies/Dodgers Game 1

I share in Whole Camels' most important thought after Game 1:  WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!  That was an incredibly satisfying game.  Watching Hamels and Lowe duel it out was a pleasure, but then watching the Phillies' offense do what it does best -- hit key home runs -- in the sixth inning was even more so.  The bullpen fell in line perfectly, making this an excellent start to the NLCS.

With those general thoughts in mind, here are some more specific ones after Game 1:

  • The big loser last night was Rafael Furcal.  He was touted in the press before the game and by Joe Buck and Tim McCarver during the game as the big difference-maker for the Dodgers.  They told me he was the best hitter on the planet (ever?) in the beginning of the season until he got hurt.  And, now that he's back at the top of the Dodgers' lineup, the team was unstoppable.  Well, let's check that thought for a bit.  Last night he was 0 for 4 at the plate.  He never looked comfortable against Cole Hamels.  Even one hit or walk would have been a game changer, as he hit in front of the two Dodgers who did manage to hit last night - Andre Ethier and Manny Ramirez (both 2 for 4 with a double apiece).  In the field, his error was the game changer.  He let Shane Victorino get on base in the sixth, paving the way for Lowe's melt-down and Utley's home run.
  • Derek Lowe pitched great, but looked awfully flustered when under pressure.  Buck and McCarver did their usual overkill in telling us how great Derek Lowe is in the post-season.  And there's some good reason for the accolades: He won the clinching games in all three series for the Red Sox in the 2004 post-season.  But last night Lowe did not look like the unflappable veteran presence on the mound.  Don't get me wrong - he was pretty dominant against the Phillies hitters for most of the night.  But, in two key situations, he appeared to get thrown off his game very easily.  In the fifth inning, he had the Phillies with two outs and Carlos Ruiz at the plate.  If he had gotten Ruiz, he would have left Cole Hamels up to start the sixth for the Phils.  Not only would that be an advantage in the sixth for the Dodgers (pitcher leading off) but it also might have forced Hamels out of the game an inning earlier than he did leave.  But Lowe gave up a single to Ruiz.  He was clearly flustered and gave up another single to Hamels.  Hamels is a good hitter (for a pitcher) but Lowe's stuff all game was better than that.  He recovered to get Rollins, but he showed he couldn't control his emotions.  The next inning, this lack of control changed the game.  Victorino got on base thanks to the Furcal error.  And then Lowe, clearly upset by the error, grooved one to Utley, who tied the game up.  Two batters later, Lowe, still flustered, gave up the game-winning home run to Pat Burrell.  Simply put: Derek Lowe wilted under pressure.  (That being said, I'd be happy to see the free agent in a Phillies uniform next season (for the right price).)
  • Ryan Madson has been the best Phillies pitcher since September 1.  Brad Lidge has been good, Jamie Moyer was clutch down the stretch, and Cole Hamels continued his consistently great performance in the month, but since September 1, Ryan Madson has been the best Phillies pitcher.  Since that date, including the post-season, he's appeared in 17 games and pitched 19 innings.  He's given up only 16 hits and 1 walk while striking out 20.  He has a combined 0.95 ERA and a 0.89 WHIP.  He has become a lock in bridging the gap to Lidge in the eighth.  With Lidge's perfect save season, Madson-Lidge is looking every bit as good as Wetteland-Rivera in their heyday.
  • Ryan Howard continued his awful post-season performance.  Chase Utley snapped out of his playoff funk last night, but Ryan Howard continued his.  After his 0 for 4 last night, he's now got a career .185/.333/.333 triple-slash line in the playoffs.  He's got 12 strikeouts against 5 walks (all in the Brewers series) and only 1 home run and 2 runs batted in.  The Phillies can win without him, but it would be much easier to win with him.
  • The Phillies have been great since Manny was traded to the Dodgers.  Here I'm reiterating a point I made a couple of days ago, but I feel it's necessary given the way the announcers went on and on about how great the Dodgers have been since the Manny trade.  Being a little more complete than I was on Wednesday by including playoff games, the Dodgers are now 33-26 since Manny was traded to them.  That's good, .559 winning percentage good.  But the Phillies have been better.  Including last night's win, they are now 38-22 since Manny joined the Dodgers.  That's a .633 winning percentage, which is not just good, it's great.
  • Chase Utley's home run continues his dominance of the Dodgers.  Chase Utley has been the best Phillie historically against the Dodgers.  His home run just continued the stretch.  Check out this list of the current Phillies' starters' (including Dobbs and Feliz) career OPS against the Dodgers:
  • OPS
    Chase Utley 1.028
    Jayson Werth 0.947
    Pat Burrell 0.848
    Ryan Howard 0.824
    Carlos Ruiz 0.737
    Shane Victorino 0.679
    Jimmy Rollins 0.636
    Pedro Feliz 0.626
    Greg Dobbs 0.500
  • Tim McCarver didn't annoy me as much as he used to.  I've long thought Tim McCarver was an insufferable baseball announcer.  There've been many playoff and World Series games that I'd have rather watched in silence than listen to his babbling about crap that doesn't matter or is deceptive (memo to Tim: get with the program - batting average is a child's stat).  But last night, despite the fawning over Manny, Torre, and all things Dodger blue, he didn't bother me as much.  Maybe it was the euphoria of the first Phillies NLCS appearance since 1993, maybe it's my increasing age, or maybe it's a change in his announcing style, but I hope it keeps up because I'm hoping to see a lot more Phillies baseball this month.
  • For the Phillies historically, this first win means a lot.  This is the Phillies' 15th post-season series in the franchise's history.  In the previous 14 series (including the Brewers series this year), the team that won the first game has won the series 11 times (1950 World Series, 1976 NLCS, 1978 NLCS, 1980 NLCS, 1980 World Series, 1981 NLDS, 1983 NLCS, 1993 NLCS, 1993 World Series, 2007 NLDS, and 2008 NLDS).  That's the good news.  Only 3 times has the team that won the first game lost the series.  The bad news is that in each of those 3 series, the Phillies won the first game but then lost the series (1915 World Series, 1977 NLCS, and 1983 World Series).
  •  

0 recs | Comment 9 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

thank you

David, thank you for stating what I hoped/tried to communicate last night but was unable to do due to some measurable level of delerium and exhaustion.

SO TIRED today. STILL WORTH IT.

Now watch them go get hammered in Game Two and I’ll feel like the Dude’s rug.

by WholeCamels on Oct 10, 2008 11:58 AM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

nobody fucks with the jesus

Foos for OC in '09!
Send... it... in!

by foos05 on Oct 10, 2008 12:16 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

McCarver

When McCarver said bunting with Taguchi was not the right play, I said “Holy crap, I actually agree with Tim McCarver about something.”

by Carlos del Vaca on Oct 10, 2008 1:49 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

agreed. I was really fighting myself there, but I thought given how well Hamels handles the bat, even if I had no intention of having him pitch I might have left him in to bunt.

by Wet Luzinski on Oct 10, 2008 3:50 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t say McCarver’s wrong any more often than most other announcers. Most other announcers are pretty stupid too. He just tends to be more aggressive and obnoxious about it. Plus he’s been overexposed for about 25 years. But he seems to be slowing down in his old age, becoming a little more sedate, less talky. Which might work to his benefit.

by taco pal on Oct 10, 2008 2:28 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

what I like about the Phils team is ...

they don’t mind dead air or brief silence … McCarver and Buck love to hear themselves speak more than anyone I’ve ever heard it’s amazing they don’t just talk over eachother.

"I need to do a better job of putting players in the right position to perennially come up short of expectations"

by Whodie126 on Oct 10, 2008 2:45 PM EDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the thing that annoyed me most about the broadcast last night

was the segment in the beginning they had about manny affecting the dodgers. they were just a mediocre 54-54 before the trade but after…
 MANNY’S STATS!
 MANNY’S STATS!
 MANNY’S STATS!

no mention whatsoever of the team’s only-a-little-bit-better-than-mediocre-record (30-25) after they got manny.

by char6587 on Oct 10, 2008 3:55 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Winning the First Game

Liked the analysis. Your final point was well worth noting – that the Phillies have lost three series where they won game one, but they have never won a series where they lost game one! I know that each year’s team is different and there’s nothing that says if you lose game one you’re doomed, but there are only so many memorable comebacks out there because they are fairly rare.
Now that it is post game two, I believe this is just the third time the Phillies have been up 2-0 (1980 WS and the Brewers series) so it is nice to see that they were successful each time before this – although they did lose game three each time. Hopefully, Moyer can put an end to that trend.
Regarding Tim McCarver, I guess I’m in the minority because I liked what McCarver did as a Phillies catcher many years ago and figured he knew what he was talking about, especially the tricks of catching. I also agreed with McCarver that putting Dobbs in made a lot more sense than bunting with Taguchi. I also thought for a second that they could have left Hamels in to bunt, but then I wondered – do I want Hamels putting his hands out in front of a pitch when he’s going to come out of the game? So, if you’re determined to bunt, then wasting Taguchi made more sense than bunting with Dobbs or Hamels.

by phillyinportland on Oct 10, 2008 8:53 PM EDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.
Start posting about the Phillies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Phillies_2008_cropped_jpeg_small
Phillies-Braves Series Sweep: Hmm, That Went Well
Wholecamels_small
Random Thoughts
Boys_small
Platoon Pitchers?
Boys_small
Obscure Phillies
Boys_small
Can't stop being Werthy...
Img
Bastardo Out For Next Start
Small
Phillies starters need to follow Happ's lead
Phillies_2008_cropped_jpeg_small
And You Thought Steroids Were No Laughing Matter
Phillies_2008_cropped_jpeg_small
Phillies Home Debacle: 'Til Death Do Us Part?
Djack_small
clay condrey to the dl

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Colevatar_small MattS

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports