Why Shane Victorino should win MVP award
Cole Hamels is on the hill tonight for the Philadelphia Phillies with an opportunity to send the Dodgers vacationing to nearby Hawaii for the rest of the post-season and end the incessant Manny/ Boston World Series talk and bring it to the “Will he re-sign with the team” soap opera debuting in the off-season.
Hamels, who has been lights out this post-season, and threw a gem in Game 1 to put the Phillies up 1-0, has already been crowned NLCS MVP if the Phillies end the series tonight and clinch their first World Series berth in 16 years. But should he be considered? Of course he should because of his dominance throughout the post-season. But, there has also been solid pitching from Brett Myers, who not only took care of business on the mound, but at the plate as well. Myers sparked the Phillies Game 2 win with his timely hitting early in the game. But the MVP award, despite how deserving Hamels may be, should not be awarded to any player on the Phillies who doesn't play everyday, but the one who does and plays every game as if it were his last.
If you walk around the Phillies locker room and ask anyone who should be MVP, the overwhelming response would be the “Flyin Hawaiian” Shane Victorino. The scrappy Victorino has embodied what the city of Philadelphia stands for in this series and that's grit and toughness. If one man on the Phillies was going to be coined the “Broad Street Bully,” it would be him. He was a “Brewer Killer” in the NLDS, drove in five runs in Game 2 against LA and stole a Casey Blake home-run with a leaping catch at the wall, almost started a brawl in Game 3 that had him squaring off with Manny Ramirez, and hit a clutch game-tying home run in the 8th inning of Game 4 which eventually helped lead the Phillies to a comeback win and a commanding 3-1 series lead.
Entering the series, let alone the playoffs, the keys for the Phillies were listed in this order – Howard, Rollins, and Utley. There was never any mention of Victorino, but all that has changed. In these playoffs, Victorino has cemented himself as not only an important cog of the Phillies machine, but one of the 10 best clutch players in the sport. He not only has more RBI's combined than Rollins, Utley, and Howard, but he also leads all post-season players with 11 RBI's and has more hits and total bases than anyone of his 3 star teammates.
The performance put forth by Victorino has been , because he's also going through the same rough stretch his manager Charlie Manuel is going through. Both men lost important figures in their life – Manuel lost his mother before Game 2, while Victorino learned of his grandmother's passing after leading the Phillies to a Game 2 NLCS victory. In a time of grave pain for both, Victorino and Manuel have managed to block it all out once they step on the field and deliver for their ballclub.
The same team who Victorino is now helping to beat, is the same team that drafted him in 1999 and gave up on him. No champagne or MVP award can be as sweet as proving your old team wrong. Nothing at all.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Wha?
I think it’s a near certainty that Victorino would be the NLCS MVP based on performance thus far. If Cole goes out and pitches a complete game shutout to clinch the pennant, they could be co-MVPs, but I think it’s Vic’s award to lose at this point.
by phatj on Oct 15, 2008 3:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
This post was apparently written from Bizarro World. If anything, Victorino is the lock to win the award, and Hamels is the one who really ought to get it.
by taco pal on Oct 15, 2008 5:00 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well, there you go
I think I’d have picked Shane, between his clutch hits and his incredible defense, but Cole certainly was money.
by phatj on Oct 15, 2008 11:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
no complaints
Victorino was the “storyline,” given his lack of recognition and his role as second pineapple (er, banana) to Utley/Rollins/Howard, but his numbers just weren’t pretty enough. he did so much for the team, but Hamels was dominant and won us 2 games.
love ’em all, really.
by bugbear on Oct 16, 2008 12:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















