Chan Ho Park Signs
David Murphy reports, courtesy of the Korea Times.
A 1-year, $2.5 million deal worth up to $5 million in incentives. Not a bad deal if we see him as a swing man and spot starter -- i.e. this year's version of Durbin -- but let's just say I'm a bit worried by some of the following quotes. Take it away, Korea Times...
Park, who has made it clear that he wants to be a starting pitcher, said the Phillies only viewed him as a starter.
``I was a little worried about the Citizen Bank Park, the home of the Phillies, which is hitter-friendly, but as they considered me as a starter, I signed with Philadelphia,'' he said.
Hopefully there's either a language barrier, or we sold him a bill of goods. I mean, the guy pitched reasonably well last year, but to be a starter you have to get guys out from both sides of the plate, which Park simply could not do (LHB .301 BAA).
0 recs |
21 comments
Comments
Wow what a great way to spend your money… Way to spend all your money on ANOTHER lefty bat, because Howard and Utley aren’t good enough, and then spend the rest of it on Chan Ho Park…. Amaro… seriously?
by ConservativeAZN on Dec 15, 2008 11:30 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Oh, yay. One good season in the last eight, moving from a pitcher’s park to a hitter’s park, probably giving him a bigger role… no way this could possibly go wrong.
Also no way that Gillick would have spent seven figures for a guy whose performance screamed “FLUKE” and could be matched by dipping into the free talent pool. No, this was an Ed Wade Special.
Watching Amaro f*ck up is already getting real old, real fast.
by dajafi on Dec 15, 2008 11:35 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
So now – the pro ibanez anti burrell facts now transfer to park/moyer?
Hmmm…and a starter huh? Nah, that’s not possible, i was vehemently told it was impossible last week.
by jemagee on Dec 15, 2008 11:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I’m praying for some sort of translation mistake in the whole ‘starting’ issue…so what’s next?
by jemagee on Dec 15, 2008 11:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Holy. Christ. I’d rather take a flier on the crippled Mark Mulder… What. The. Fuck.
But T.O. and his sideline histrionics wear on a quarterback. He's like the hot stripper you tried to clean up and convert into a real girlfriend. It's a lot of fun until the moment she has her second drink while out to eat with your parents. You unravel quicker than she does.
by foos05 on Dec 15, 2008 12:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Look, I don’t have a problem with adding Park as long as they aren’t serious about putting him in the rotation. While LHB did kill him, as I mentioned above, his fastball was up to an average of 92.6 mph last year (from 88.4 the year before) and he induced 50.9% grounders, which should play just fine in front of our infield defense. Tom Verducci even had this to say about him back in October:
Chan Ho Park — yes, Chan Ho Park — has somehow revived his career at age 35 and is throwing as well as he did eight years ago. His fastball is regularly clocked at 96 mph. “What’s his contract situation? He’s a sleeper starter for somebody next year,” said one club pitching expert. The Dodgers signed Park last December to a one-year, $500,000 deal.
I like everything there except for the “starter” part. I’m sure the incentives in the deal are tied to innings, so let’s just hope the Phils add a starter and Happ pitches well enough in spring training to take the fifth spot in the rotation.
by PhillyFriar on Dec 15, 2008 12:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No you wouldn’t believe me. He hasn’t adjusted his mechanics at all since the string of arm injuries, and his mechanics are the source of all of his arm troubles. He will be on and off the DL for the rest of his career.
by FuquaManuel on Dec 15, 2008 1:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. Love him in the sixth-seventh inning role shared with Durbin. There’s no way he’s a starter on this team, he’s going to be outpitched by Happ and Carrasco in Spring Training. It’s not like they have a ton of money into him that he has to be a starter, if anything the innings incentives were put in there knowing he wouldn’t start just to get him to sign. Maybe Rube used his sneakiness powers on Chan Ho and just straight up lied.
by PattheBat on Dec 15, 2008 12:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I hope we tricked him. I can understand the move honestly. Rube is thinkin the 5th starter will be a young guy, who has to be out park. If park loses, its his own damn fault and he goes in the bullpen. I personally think its a brilliant move. If someone gets hurt, you have more than 1 person to backfill as well.
Question is, there is now one spot left in the rotation. Do the phils sign moyer or lowe?
by Clyde Simmons on Dec 15, 2008 1:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
From first to worst baby!
Chan’s awsome line:
.289 BA .372 OBP .462 SLG .834 OPS
That is the line Chan put up LAST year in opposing parks.
Strangely similiar to what Ibanez did in opposing parks last year.
.309 BA .362 OBP .462 SLG .824 OPS
For Who? My teammates.
For What? To Win.
How Much? Where do I sign?
by jonk on Dec 15, 2008 1:03 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Home/road splits
Do you think Amaro knows what they are?
by David S. Cohen on Dec 15, 2008 2:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Phillies signed Moyer. Park is here as a reliever, folks. They probably told him he’d have the opportunity to compete to be a starter (in the 5 slot) or something like that.
by taco pal on Dec 15, 2008 2:50 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
2.5 million for a one inning guy with chan ho park numbers – that sounds interesting
by jemagee on Dec 15, 2008 2:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
So is this it?
Ibanez, Moyer, and Chan Ho Park?
Minus Burrell (and the 2 draft picks we could have had), and a draft pick for the Ibanez signing.
Hopefully they continue to pursue Lowe and lock up a few of the arbitration eligible guys, otherwise I think you could say that as a team both now and in the future we have gotten worse. Especially relative to our division rival who has addressed its largest weakness from last season at a reasonable price.
by FuquaManuel on Dec 15, 2008 3:39 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
On second thought, maybe I am being too premature in my judgment. It is only December, after all. I just don’t like where things are going.
by FuquaManuel on Dec 15, 2008 3:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Remains to be seen what’s really left of Fred Wilpon’s fortune. It will be interesting to see if the Mets clamp down or start to change their FA strategy. Interesting that this happens http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/sports/baseball/14wilpon.html?scp=2&sq=Fred%20Wilpon&st=cse just after the FRod signing — the Mets closer position is truly cursed. May it ever be thus.
We all have to realize that every baseball ownership interest (including our silent blueblooded cabal)has seen portfolio dips of 30-50% on average that will put tremendous pressure on cash flow—-Mets aside, the small-market teams must be swallowing very hard. Good Lord—what must the Tigers be thinking these days? Thus I don’t see any reason to instruct GMs to move quickly. I see a ST bargain rack galore. Hard enough hitting a regular season game with the family on the cheap. Take away my job and there’s no way I go—Blue Rocks and R-Phils only, and even then I’ll have to think about it.
by Wet Luzinski on Dec 15, 2008 5:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree with the premise that baseball teams spend money because they are rich. They spend money because they will make money doing so. Putting money into your baseball team is now a relatively better investment than putting money into a lot of other investments. If the issue with some of these owners is actually liquidity, they should sell it to someone else. There’s money to be made my investing in players to grow your teams winning percentage, and subsequently, revenue.
by Matt Swartz on Dec 16, 2008 1:08 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Should be Burrell “or” the 2 draft picks we could have had, no? Otherwise, your point is well taken.
by taco pal on Dec 16, 2008 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i’d like to be hopeful, and even though we are the WORLD PHUCKING CHAMPIONS, I don’t see these moves setting the team up for a title defense…
it’s hard to shake 24 years of pessimism
by pjnc2003 on Dec 15, 2008 4:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
chan ho park is not the kind of guy that’s suddenly going to see success again at this point in his career.. with that said, i can only see him coming out of the pen to long relieve in games where we’re being blown out early.. and no one should be paid $2.5 million to play that role
by stillhotish on Dec 16, 2008 4:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















