The Good Phight: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Backing the Pack for NC State Fans!


Phillies decline to offer arbitration to Burrell, Moyer.

The Philadelphia Phillies have reportedly refused to offer salary arbitration to free agents Pat Burrell and Jamie Moyer. 

The first and most substantial effect of this decision is that, if Burrell and/or Moyer leave Philadelphia, the Phillies receive no compensatory draft picks from the signing team.  However, the rule prohibiting the non-offering team from re-signing its free agents until May 1st of the following season has come off the books, so this isn't over yet.

The prospect of both Moyer and Burrell accepting salary arbitration must have spooked this team badly enough that they'd risk both walking away with NO compensation for the team.  The economics of the game must be terrible right now... that, or this organization is going to coast for awhile on the goodwill it earned this year. 

0 recs | Comment 28 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from The Good Phight

Phillies vs. Mets: July 3-5

Jul 2009 by MattS - 2 comments

Dig Me Out: Phillies 5, Blue Jays 4

Jun 2009 by dajafi - 12 comments

Phillies at Blue Jays: June 26-28

Jun 2009 by MattS - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

my comment from deleted thread

If you take it as read that the Phillies definitely want Moyer back, and are at least somewhat open to having Burrell back, the logic is easy to follow: they think they can get one or both players back for less than what an arbitrator would award. Yes, the likelihood is that they’d come to agreements even before getting to arbitration, were either to accept—but in the case of Burrell, the fact that an arbitrator was available to hear the case essentially would guarantee a raise from Pat’s $14 million salary in 2008. It seems fairly certain that they want him back, if at all, for no more and probably less than that. Now it’s likely that they’ll either retain Burrell at their price, or—much more likely, since any suitor wouldn’t have to part with a draft pick—someone else will snap him up.

So Ruben Amaro is taking two big chances here: one, that the decision not to offer arbitration, which can be a move to scare off potential suitors as much as to indicate ongoing interest in the player, won’t burn the Phillies regarding their interest in bringing one or both back; and two, that if they do lose one or both of Moyer and Burrell, they can replace them with players of roughly equal ability for roughly equal cost. It comes down to Amaro’s read of both the market overall, and the level of trust with both players.

Don’t get me wrong: I would have offered both of them arbitration without a second thought. And my sense is that this will, in fact, blow up in Amaro’s face. But it’s not a move that shows any lack of confidence.

by dajafi on Dec 2, 2008 12:27 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

well, that's great

Good to know we’re looking to be cheap. Unless there is a pre-existing agreement with Burrell, I cannot for the life of me see the logic behind this decision. I know that there are 10 arb eligible players, blah blah blah, but I don’t buy it. The Phillies sold out nearly every home game in 2008, and brought in 7 or 8 games worth of exorbitantly overpriced playoff tickets. There’s a lot of cash in the coffers, especially as World Series merch will be purchased for the holidays.

I see this as a bad baseball decision. It’s not in Burrell’s best interests to take arbitration offer. He has plenty of good at-bats left in him, and he is coming off of a 33 homer season. To jettison the 2 high draft choices he could have brought us is plain silly. I hope he stays in pinstripes, but I sense Ruben just made his first big mistake.

by Governator on Dec 2, 2008 12:30 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Let me add to that

All this does (at least cost/benefit wise) is make it harder for the Phils to sign Pat, as other teams now have to hand over nothing but the cash for the contract to sign him.

by Governator on Dec 2, 2008 12:31 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

exactly

They’re either very, very confident that they’ll be able to get him at their price, or they simply don’t care if he walks, to the point where bringing him back at say $15m for one year—an outcome I would have characterized as something close to ’best case"—is totally unappealing.

But even there, I don’t get why there wasn’t an offer to Moyer. If you’re any team with good young pitchers but a dearth of reliable innings guys, doesn’t the fact that you won’t lose a pick make it much more palatable to take a shot on the old guy?

by dajafi on Dec 2, 2008 12:34 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

maybe they’re banking on moyer’s desire to stay in philly? my prediction is that the moyer move will end up looking savvy and the burrell move will look incredibly dumb.
ugh ugh ugh

by char6587 on Dec 2, 2008 12:37 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

all this did was give moyer bargaining power that he wasn’t going to have. there’s no way it looks savvy because there is no benefit to not offering it. it’s simply a failure to understand that lowering the amount that moyer could get elsewhere helps the phillies pay less even if moyer is unlikely to sign elsewhere.

by MattS on Dec 2, 2008 12:38 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

erm, I guess that’s right. well how about, I HOPE that the moyer move will end up looking savvy.

maybe they just don’t want him back?
AH!

by char6587 on Dec 2, 2008 12:52 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What kind of deal will it take to sign Burrell?

by wilriv21 on Dec 2, 2008 12:41 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

more than before. teams will likely be willing to pay a few million more for burrell with the draft pick opportunity cost of doing so lower. unless the phillies were convinced burrell wouldn’t get a better deal elsewhere, this makes no sense.

by MattS on Dec 2, 2008 12:44 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Am a SF Giants fan and was wondering how many years/dollars Burrell was looking for?

by wilriv21 on Dec 2, 2008 12:48 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m guessing he wants something like 5/$75MM, would happily settle for something like 4/$55MM, but may end up closer to about 3/$40MM. He allegedly rejected 2/$22MM a couple months ago. I think the Phillies think he will end up with something like 3/$30MM because that’s the only reason that they wouldn’t offer arbitration. With 3/$40MM on the line, it’s hard to believe he would accept arbitration instead.

by MattS on Dec 2, 2008 12:51 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I hadn’t seen the new thread before ranting on the old one, so without meaning to repeat myself: unless Amaro does something intelligent and unexpected with the savings he’s made here — i.e. signing a free agent starter or working out an extension with someone like Hamels, Werth, or Victorino — then this is a short-sighted, stupid move.

And a slight tangential rant: isn’t the risk of paying, say, $5 million more than you’d prefer for Burrell and Moyer worth the draft picks you’d otherwise net? I still don’t think Burrell would settle for a 1-year deal at any price — he’s entering his decline phase and will want to lock into a long-term contract now — but even if we put the odds at 70/30 that he’d decline, the two draft picks would be worth that risk. Being scared to shell out a couple of extra million, in a year you won the friggin’ World Series and got all the revenue that comes with that, when the potential reward is a pair of draft picks that will help you restock your farm system, is quite frankly no way to run an organization.

by PhillyFriar on Dec 2, 2008 1:41 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

EAR MUFFS EAR MUFFS LALALALA WE WON THE WORLD SERIES LALALALALALA I CANT HEAR YOU NOTHING’S GOING ON WE WON THE WORLD SERIES LALALALALALALALALALALA.

For Who? My teammates.

For What? To Win.

How Much? Where do I sign?

by jonk on Dec 2, 2008 9:29 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, it’s nice to see that the the more things change the more they stay the same

by jemagee on Dec 2, 2008 9:39 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Staying the same would be nice. The problem is that this may very well make us worse.

by taco pal on Dec 2, 2008 2:08 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

First post here, and as I hate it to be to the Met’s SBN blog, they assembled a good list of the arbitration players.

I just hope this means we aren’t seriously considering Raul Ibanez.

by X-Large on Dec 2, 2008 11:10 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This is so aggravating. MattS’s point above is the most important one. Even if Amaro’s right about the market, that will probably be cancelled out (or at least greatly minimized) by the fact that (1) their market price will be driven back up by the fact that other teams won’t have to give up compensation to sign them, and (2) you’re now guaranteed to have to deal with them for more than a year. So considering that the market factors point in both directions at once, it’s better to just take the security of being sure that you’re not going to be left with nothing.

Amaro is taking a huge, and probably unnecessary risk. He’d better not get burned.

by taco pal on Dec 2, 2008 2:14 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

A Question

Suppose for the sake of argument that Amaro is right about the FA market – which, admittedly, is possible given the state of the economy these days. Amaro was not the only GM who declined to offer arbitration yesterday to players who normally would have gotten offers.

If that’s so, why would it necessarily be the case that an arbitrators would give out a salary to Burrell or Moyer above what the market will bear? Arbitration hearings won’t be held until February. By that time, the depressed market that we are supposing will play out will have established itself. That would then be evidence that the arbitrator would be able to take into account at the hearing. If no one around the league is getting raises, then why should we be afraid that an arbitrator will give raises to Burrell or Moyer? If the Phillies’ revenue projections look bleak in February, won’t they be able to present that to the arbitrator at that time?

by taco pal on Dec 2, 2008 5:28 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fear-based decision...

My gut says this really is a fear-based decision. Unfortunately, I think the economy is behind the reasoning, and I can’t really blame the front office. Things will be tough all over, and the recession is going to last a while. I think there will be a lot of empty seats in every ballpark, and I think all pro athletes looking to score a HUGE contract in the next couple of seasons are going to be disappointed.
That being said, I think Moyer will re-sign or retire, I don’t see him loading up his family for another move. He has one, maybe two years left, As for Burrell, there are certainly a few AL teams that will probably make a run at him, and if he is willing to DH at least part-time, he will most likely sign for more $$ than the Phils will offer. The loss of Burrell will sting, but I do think that the Phightin’ Phills still have enough tools to make another run.

"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace." Jimi Hendrix

by philly420pdxhilo on Dec 2, 2008 5:47 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Baseball is awash in cash

The fears about the economy are widely believed by experts to be overblown by the media because it’s a sensationalist story. The economy goes through a recession periodically, and nothing short of a depression will seriously impact the Phils coffers or impede people from attending games. Especially coming off a WS win. Certainly not unless the recession lasts years, which it won’t. There’re too many failsafes to allow for another depression, I see this move as Phils being short-sighted about the payroll this year.

by Alon on Dec 2, 2008 7:11 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh, plus

They don’t want to keep losing arby cases. That’s bad business.

by Alon on Dec 2, 2008 7:12 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I know this isn’t a forum on the economy, but suggesting that this is just a periodic recession is ridiculous. Maybe the media is over-blowing it, but not by much. Look past the media and just look at the data—this is no typical recession.

by char6587 on Dec 2, 2008 7:18 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dumbfounded

The team is talking like it’s a cheap team again. Not a team that sold out a ton of its games and drew over 3M fans. Oh, or a team that won a World Series.

by David S. Cohen on Dec 3, 2008 11:56 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Joe Sheehan's take

“On the other hand, the list of players who were not offered arbitration includes a whole bunch of guys in the same situation as Abreu and Pettitte [who Sheehan argued should have obviously been offered arbitration by the Yankees]. The Phillies punted Pat Burrell and Jamie Moyer, both Type A free agents, in a situation identical to that of the Yankees. They have the money and the absence of the players is not easily rectified. Having both on one-year deals would have been a solid solution, and giving up the shot at draft picks is a waste.”

by David S. Cohen on Dec 3, 2008 4:02 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I heard something today about how maybe the reason for it was the signing bonuses that they would have to give to the draftees? Maybe that has something to do with it?

by char6587 on Dec 4, 2008 12:39 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.
Start posting about the Phillies »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Phillies_2008_cropped_jpeg_small
Phillies-Braves Series Sweep: Hmm, That Went Well
Wholecamels_small
Random Thoughts
Boys_small
Platoon Pitchers?
Boys_small
Obscure Phillies
Boys_small
Can't stop being Werthy...
Img
Bastardo Out For Next Start
Small
Phillies starters need to follow Happ's lead
Phillies_2008_cropped_jpeg_small
And You Thought Steroids Were No Laughing Matter
Phillies_2008_cropped_jpeg_small
Phillies Home Debacle: 'Til Death Do Us Part?
Djack_small
clay condrey to the dl

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Colevatar_small MattS

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports