FLUKE OR NOT?-- PART ONE
FLUKE OR NOT?
STARTING PITCHERS
From Myers to Burrell to Utley to Lidge, it seems that a lot of Phillies are performing quite differently than expected. In the next few posts, I’m going to discuss some of the peripheral statistics for these guys and see what’s different and whether these performance changes are likely to persist. For today, I’ll work on a couple of starting pitchers.
Brett Myers:
Actual: 5.52 ERA
Projected (ZIPS): 3.31 ERA
Myers is still striking people out, slightly below his strike out rate from years past as a starter, but still a solid 7.73 K/9. His walk rate is up slightly to 3.44 BB/9. Both of those are as a result of recent performances, and probably unwise adjustments after being unlucky on balls in play and homeruns/flyball in his earlier starts. I would guess he rebounds to around three walks per game and 8 strikeouts per game.
A lot of his change in performance is luck. His BABIP is high-- .337. His career rate is a very normal .304, and my guess is that’s what he’ll have from here out. It seems that he’s having some problems in the first inning—he’s given 16 first inning runs in 12 games, good for an ERA of 12.00, and his ERA after the first inning has been 4.29. That seems like a mental problem to me, and those things are easier to fix than rotator cuffs. These things both indicate he's likely to turn it around.
His homeruns/flyball rate is still very high at 18.3% but it has been falling for a few starts now (I think it was up at 25.1% a few weeks ago). Apparently his career homeruns/flyball is very high—15.1%. For someone who plays half his games in CBP, you would expect that number to be around 12.5%. I’ve read that there is very little evidence that pitchers have much control on homeruns/flyball, but his 15.1% rate is much higher than that-- in fact, the difference is statistically significant at the 98% level. That leaves very little room for a claim that it is a fluke. It’s still possible, but I would guess Myers does have some tendency to give up longer flyballs than other pitchcers. Certainly, it should go down from here.
My guess: FLUKE. Myers will probably have an ERA of around 4.00 from here out and finish around 4.50 for the year. There’s simply nothing in his performance that makes me think we shouldn’t count on him as our number 2 from here out. The team needs to work on keeping his first inning nerves down, or perhaps simply telling him that it’s the second inning and that he is actually in for an 8-inning save each time out. Either way, I think he’ll sort out his head enough to succeed.
Adam Eaton:
Actual: 4.63 ERA
Projected (ZIPS): 5.53 ERA
Hamels, Moyer, and Kendrick have been performing quite consistently with expectations thus far, so I'm not going to analyze them here. Let me know what you think about Myers and Eaton. Will Myers stay bad? Will Eaton stay average?
Tomorrow, I'll post about some hitters-- specifically on the disappointing seasons thus far of Ruiz and Howard, and the superb seasons thus far of Utley and Burrell.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I don’t think anyone can pinpoint anything on Myers. His numbers are all over the place. He gives up 15 homeruns in his first 9 games and 0 since then, but still loses 2 of 3. In those losses he had 23 GB to 10 FB and lost them and then in his last game he had 5 GB to 12 FB and won it. Nothing is consistent.
I am guessing at a couple of possible things. First, it may be conditioning (I hate to agree with the talking heads). With conditioning, sometimes some people slow down fast or other take a while to heat up. He might be a little out of shape and it takes his body longer to warm up and thus problems in the first.
The other thing I was wondering, especially on the groundballs, is if his teammates aren’t going all out for him. Nothing other than speculation there and I don’t even like to think that a player is not playing up to his capabilities, but I can’t come up with really any other reason for Myer’s lack of success. They all hate him.
For Who? My teammates.
For What? To Win.
How Much? Where do I sign?
Yeah, the sabotage idea feels really far-fetched to me. I have absolutely no doubt that these guys want to win above all.
I’m not sure that Eaton’s success can be written off as a “partial fluke.” He’s had a few 2007-type starts (and a few awful innings within otherwise-solid starts) and they’ve stood out because he isn’t as aggressive. My impression is that when he’s succeeded this season, it’s been because he attacks the strike zone early in the count and trusts his stuff-which is good enough for him to win. The difference in approach might not be sufficient to drop the ERA by a point and a half, and maybe he slides back to 5.00 or so for the season. But if he keeps throwing innings-which is really the key for the whole rotation and pitching staff—I’ll take that happily.
Myers’ BABIP by count could be helpful:
2008/career:
0-0: .351/.325
1-0: .444/.360
2-0: .500/.330
3-0: UND/.429
0-1: .308/.267
1-1: .320/.283
2-1: .385/.254
3-1: .444/.299
0-2: .222/.278
1-2: .217/.281
2-2: .429/.302
3-2: .238/.320
Except for 0-2, 1-2, and 3-2 counts, Myers is seemingly doing worse on balls in play in each situation.
He doesn’t seem to be getting behind in the count especially worse than before. His 2008/career first pitch distribution is: 40.5%/38.5% ball, 48.3%/47.4% strike, and 13.2%/12.1% in play. I don’t think there’s even an issue with getting behind or hitters’ approach to him. I don’t know that he is getting less support from his fielders (I also see that as a bit far-fetched), but the problem is across the board. Maybe he is tipping his pitches somewhat, or at least hitters are able to guess what he’s throwing more. Fangraphs does show he’s throwing his slider a lot more than he did, or at least his cutter/slider type pitch is registering more as a slider. I don’t have BABIP by pitch, but that would be helpful.
Eaton actually is doing way better on balls in play, and that could be his place in the count. His first pitch is being hit into play less, he’s throwing it for a ball less, and for a strike more.
First pitch in play/ball/strike in 2007: 14.6/43.5/41.9
First pitch in play/ball/strike in 2008: 11.7/41.3/47.0
Eaton does seem to be pitching better, but his homeruns/flyball are down at 9.9% instead of the 12.5% you’d expect. That would be about 3 homeruns less than you’d expect, leading to about 4.2 less runs than you’d expect, and his ERA coming out about 0.56 lower than you’d expect. So I see him with around a 5.10 ERA performance this year rather than a 4.63 ERA performance. Much better, but partial fluke. Dajafi is right that some of this is true improvement, but the improvement seems exaggerated by warning track flyouts replacing a few first row homers.
Yeah, I definitely see him absorbing more souvenir-related damage as it gets warmer. But that kind of goes back to the original mistake of signing a flyball pitcher to perform in OFJOAB.
Thanks for posting that first-pitch data. Always gratifying to see one’s “I watch the games” impressions borne out in, y’know, reality ;)
Cool Adam Eaton Fact
It's funny
Despite having watched most Phillies games for the near 1 1/2 seasons Eaton’s been here, I didn’t have a real clear idea of what his repertoire was until I looked at that link.
He’s just this kind of anonymous, bad pitching cipher.

by 





























