Is Kyle Kendrick Pumpkinizing?
It seems almost obnoxious to criticize the Phillies’ starting rotation, which has vastly exceeded expectations in keeping the team’s playoff hopes afloat as the offense has gone limp over the last nine weeks. But as the standings ultimately don’t care whether you win (or lose) 2-1 or 11-10, and the team has such little margin for error as long as the bats aren’t producing, the team is beginning to face the question of what to do with second-year starter Kyle Kendrick.
Kendrick’s up-and-down year has followed the shocking success of his 2007 rookie campaign, when he turned what was supposed to be one emergency start into 10 wins, some Rookie of the Year votes, and a Game Two playoff start. Granting that it’s unreasonable to ask much more of Kendrick (or any #5 starter) than what he’s delivered in 2008—10 wins, a 5 ERA, and a quality start just less than half the time—the question is what to expect of him going forward, and whether the Phillies should consider alternatives as they head into the 2008 home stretch.
In his last two starts, Kendrick has been thrashed: a combined 13 runs in 7 innings, on 15 hits and 8 walks. The first, against the much-improved Dodgers lineup, can be excused; the second, facing the anemic Padres on Saturday, really can’t be. Even before Kendrick melted down in the fourth inning, allowing five runs, he was tentative on the mound, pitching around .200-hitting Sean Kazmar to get to pitcher Chris Reineke in the second inning. Then in the fourth, Reineke’s single plated San Diego’s second run and Kendrick could not recover, allowing a single, walk, bases-clearing double and intentional walk before leaving the game.
Kendrick’s two fatal flaws in 2008 have been wildness and a painful inability to retire lefty hitters. Both bit him on Saturday, as he walked five and surrendered the last two big hits after Reineke’s—Jody Gerut’s single and the Brian Giles double—to left-handers. For the season, Kendrick has issued 49 walks in 134.2 IP, compared to 25 free passes in 121 innings last year; he’s had five starts in which he’s walked at least four hitters. In 2008, lefties are batting .326/.398/.527 against Kendrick, with 24 doubles, 10 home runs and 36 walks in 317 plate appearances; he has struck out just 22. By contrast, righties are hitting .269/.322/.391 against Kendrick, with 10 doubles, 7 homers, and 13 walks, and he has struck out 39.
It’s fair to ask whether Kendrick has been unusually lucky in his brief big-league career. He isn’t a strikeout pitcher, with just 4.1 per 9 IP (up from 3.7 in 2007), and lefties hit him about as hard last season (.321/.372/.549), but it didn’t show up on the scoreboard; his Fielding-Independent Pitching score (FIP) was 4.90, more than a run higher than his nominal ERA of 3.87. This year, his FIP is 5.21, much closer to his official ERA of 5.01. A big part of the difference is double plays: the Phils turned a stunning 18 behind him in 2007, but just 7 this year in more innings.
Related to the double plays is Kendrick’s fortune, or skill, in pitching out of trouble: last year, opponents batted an unfathomably low .245/.288/.344 in all situations with runners on base, compared to .305/.348/.524 with bases empty. This season, he’s still better under pressure: .281/.353/.421 with men on, compared to .312/.369/.490 with the sacks empty. But as the league has seen him a couple times now and hitters are more prone to laying off his sinker, the results are starting to converge. He needs to make another adjustment; can the Phils afford to wait and see if he can do that?
Since his nightmare outing in San Diego, Kendrick has pointed to mechanics issuesas the cause for his struggles. I can’t speak to that, but given his big workload over the last two seasons and struggles with location that have been intermittent since spring training, it’s worth asking whether fatigue or injury might be involved. In addition to his 134 innings this year at age 23, Kendrick threw 202 innings between AA and the big leagues last season at age 22/23, up from 176 the year before and 118 as a 20 year-old in 2005. That’s a lot of mileage on a young arm, and with all the runners he allows, most of those innings were at least somewhat stressful.
Going forward, I wonder if Kendrick’s splits and groundball tendencies might not better suit him for a situational relief role if he can’t come up with another pitch to retire left-handers. For now, the Phillies might have to think about alternatives—and they have three viable options at triple-A Lehigh Valley, where rehabbing vet Kris Benson, strikeout-inducing lefty J.A. Happ, and top prospect Carlos Carrasco all have shown some value. Given Kendrick’s good work since June 2007, this seems ungracious at least—but letting the young pitcher continue to flail in tough upcoming series against the Dodgers, Mets and Cubs won’t do anyone much good either.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Kendrick is what he is: a marginal, 5.00 ERA, fringe major leaguer/5th starter. I don’t expect his performance for the rest of the year to deviate much from his ERA in either direction.
- However, for a 5th starter, there’s a lot to like about Kendrick:
- He’s young, so there’s more potential for improvement than with a typical #5.
- He does what he does with 2 pitches (arguably one pitch). While this may mean he’s easier for the league to adjust to, I think this also increases his ceiling. If he can learn a third pitch, he may improve significantly.
- He seems as if he’s been disproportionately bad in a few starts (haven’t ran the numbers to see). A guy with Kendrick’s skill set is going to have games where he gets hit around. However, he’s had multiple games where he hasn’t been able to throw strikes, which is a different type of failure. I think Kendrick is capable of bringing his walk rate down further.
On the flip side, I don’t know if FIP/xFIP/DIPS take into account HBP. Kendrick has shown a propensity to hit batters and these should basically be considered walks. When you factor in his HBP, Kendrick’s K/BB goes from 61/49 to 61/61. For his career, Kendrick has hit 19 batters in ~250IP.
by christonabike on Aug 18, 2008 7:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A tale of 2 pitchers...
KK: 25 G 10 W 7 L 134.2 IP 164 H 75 ER 17 HR 49 BB 61 K 1.58 WHIP 5.01 ERA
BM: 22 G 5 W 10 L 134.1 IP 136 H 75 ER 26 HR 53 BB 109 K 1.41 WHIP 5.02 ERA
Kendrick and Myers basically have the same ERA since they have given up the same number of runs in 1/3rd different innings (despite 3 less starts for Myers). That is where the comparison ends though. Kendrick somehow has 5 more wins and 3 less losses despite having inferior numbers across the board. He has given up 28 more hits!!!, while walking 4 less but striking out 58 less. His only advantage is in homers allowed. Myers has obviously not had a good year, but has been turning it on lately. Kendrick has just been ridiculously lucky to even have a 5.01 ERA.
For Who? My teammates.
For What? To Win.
How Much? Where do I sign?
by jonk on Aug 19, 2008 5:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Myers has shown the ability to shut down good lineups. I didn’t include this in the piece, but a lot of Kendrick’s better starts this year have come against teams like, well, the Nationals. You never want to overdetermine from one game, but if he can’t even handle the Padres in a big spot, that’s really worrisome.
(And on those occasions when Kendrick has a successful start against a decent lineup, it’s hard to escape the conclusion that luck was a huge factor. I’m thinking of that last game against the Mets in Philly in early July, the 12-inning game: he went 6 or 7 and allowed one run, on a solo homer by Beltran, but he pitched out of trouble pretty much every single inning. Is that a repeatable skill? History says no.)
by dajafi on Aug 19, 2008 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And he’s going to get the benefit of every doubt because he’s won 10 games twice now, while potentially “dominant” (to use the word loosely) guys who miss bats like Happ and Carrasco will languish because they’re not “proven”.
Kill me. Kill me in the CHEST.
by WholeCamels on Aug 19, 2008 7:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















