Phillies Tidbits
Entering the last week of the season, I figured I'd try to look at some interesting stats.
Hamels: 220.3 IP
Assuimg Cole makes his next start and pitches 2+ innings, he'll be on pace to have the most innings pitched by a starter in 10 years. Unless that game goes into some deep extras and Cole pitches them all, he won't match Shilling's 268.7 IP in 1998. Yeah, 15 complete games. I don't remember that either. No CY Young votes for him either. As a side note and purely an opinion, I noticed that Tyler Green still happened to be on the team that year and I watched him on the post game show today and he sucked. No offense Tyler, but you were awful. He said that Howard is a legit MVP candidate because the difference between his .247 avg and Pujols avg is all a bunch of empty bloop hits that mean nothing because you are left on base. I mean, COME ON MAN!

Carlos Ruiz: 66 OPS+ (for a "starter") is the lowest since...wait for it...last year. Abe Nunez had an OPS+ of 54 last year in 252 ABs. Nunez had 11 extra base hits in 252 ABs. Yeah, and we made the playoffs.
Phillies: Have 7 guys with double digit HRs and 3 guys with 9 (Jenkins, Coste and Dobbs). If 1 or 2 of those guys top 10, that would be the most players with double digit homeruns since 2004, when Lieby, Thome, Polanco, Bell, Rollins, Burrell, Abreu, Michaels and Utley all did it. (Btw, in 1998, they only had 3 guys get double digit HRs, Brogna, Rolen and Abreu).
Phillies: Currently 20 games over .500. The most the team has been over .500 since 1993 when they peaked at 35 over on Sept 28th. This team has been 2 games under .500. That team was never under. The 2000 team was never over .500 and the 2001 and 2003 team was bever under .500. Both those teams were painful to watch as they were always good, but just never were consistently really good. The 1997 team bottomed out at 47 games under .500.
Offense: Worst OPS+ (103) (tied with 2003) since 2001 when they had a 97. Tomas Perez was 4th on that team in OPS+ at 103.
Pitching: Best ERA+ (at 113) since 1976 (115). The '94 strike team was at 112. Consequently, that gives them the 4th best ERA+ for this franchise since 1920. That 1976 team was built a little differently with 3 starters at 200+ innings and 3 bullpen guys at 90+ innings. 10 guys on the staff the entire year except for 3 innings of 1 game.
Offense: Need just 11 HRs to break their all time mark of 216 set 2 years ago.
Myers: Has recorded his 5th season with double digit wins. Last Phillie to do that was Curt Schilling who also had 5.
Phillies: Last time they made the playoffs in back to back years was 1980 and 1981. Would be nice, right?
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
ERA+
Wow – that’s pretty impressive with their ERA+. Fourth best since 1920? With this group of pitchers? Like I said, wow.
by David S. Cohen on
Sep 22, 2008 10:06 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Imagine if the Phillies had LAST YEAR’S offense and THIS YEAR’S pitching. They’d probably be etching a trophy right now…
by WholeCamels on
Sep 22, 2008 10:08 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
True. But don’t count it out. There’s always a chance we get into a nice month long groove here and “find” last year’s offense…
by foos05 on
Sep 22, 2008 10:46 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ve been thinking about the 20-over thing. When they got to 19 I figured out that the last time that had happened was ’95, which meant that ’93 had to be the benchmark for any attainable result in this season beyond that…
Ruiz’s OPS+ is ugly, but I have to say that he’s been pretty good since about the all-star break. He draws walks, he puts it in play, and most important he handles the pitchers very well.
by dajafi on
Sep 22, 2008 11:59 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree on Ruiz, “my eyes” tell me that he’s really been a good catcher and his offensive numbers have been more than acceptable for the last couple of months. Hopefully that’s his “new normal” and not a Nunez 2005-esque “peak”.
by WholeCamels on
Sep 22, 2008 12:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think the better comp to Nunez was his first-half hitting this year.
Ruiz gave a credible offensive performance for a non-McCann/Martin catcher last year. He absolutely raked in spring training this year—to the point where one idiot I know (the guy writing this) grabbed him for a couple fantasy teams and smugly told everyone he had the next NL all-star catcher. He was so horrible for those three months that his end-year numbers will look bad, but I think the Ruiz of 2007 and the second half this year is the guy they’ll see going forward—basically a Johnny Estrada with better on-base skills and maybe a bit less power.
That said, it will be really interesting to see how they handle the position next year. Ruiz will be 30, Coste 36, and Marson might be ready. I think they’ve got both Ruiz and Coste for one more year pre-arb, so maybe that determines the choices.
by dajafi on
Sep 22, 2008 12:20 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ruiz since the AS break:
In 132 plate appearances he has hit .277/.377(!)/.393
He has made up for his awful power by being patient and getting on base at an excellent clip.
by FuquaManuel on
Sep 22, 2008 1:23 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
If Coste isn’t under contract, I predict they let him walk. He’s a good back up catcher, but at 36, wow……you just can’t really trust him to be the everyday catcher if Ruiz goes down.
I like him, but I understand the business side of letting him go. If that roster spot is given to a crappy middle infielder instead, I’ll be mad.
by Bilzo on
Sep 22, 2008 2:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Okay, but if Ruiz goes down, they’d call up Marson or Jaramillo anyway, no?
Coste has a better bat than most backup catchers, but I’ve come to doubt him a bit on the defensive side. I wouldn’t mind seeing them keep him as a catcher/infielder (corners) and pinch-hitter, maybe even with Ruiz and Marson or JJ on the roster too.
by dajafi on
Sep 22, 2008 3:25 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs












