Best Case Scenario
To me, the best case scenario has nothing to do with the individual teams and matchups, but rather, limiting the exposure of their best players against ours. Since there is nothing we can do to force that, we can hope that luck throws us an Ace of Spades.
Going on the presumption that the final standing will look like this:
Cubs
NL East Winner
NL West Winner
Wild Card
We have the following scenarios:
Phils take East, Brewers take WC, Phils play Brewers.
Phils take East, Mets take WC, Phils play NL West winner.
Phils take WC, Phils play Cubs.
Of those scenarios, which ones work out best for the Phillies? The WC scenario is the only one where we do not have home field advantage (which is less of a concern for the Phillies than the Cubs), but not a desirable proposition. Factor in facing Zambrano and Harden in the first two games and this appears to be the least acceptable.
That basically has us rooting for the Mets or the Brewers. If the Mets win, we face the NL West. If it is LA, the current leader, we face Billingsly and Lowe. If we face Arizona, then it would be Webb and Haren with a little RJ sprinkled in. Looks like LA would be a better choice in terms of starters faced. If the Brewers win, we face Sabathia and Sheet (probably).
So, it seems like LA would be the most desirable of all possibilities in terms of starters faced. While that may, or may not be true, the best case is if we don't have to face one of the top starters in the first or second game. What is an easier rotation to face?
Sabathia
Sheets
Bush
Sabathia
Sheets
Or
Sheets
Bush
Sabathia
Sheets
Bush
The same thing goes with LA. I'd much prefer to face Billingsly once rather than twice. So, the best case is hoping that the Mets and Brewers tie for the wild card. Sabathia is scheduled to pitch on Thursday the 25th against Pittsburgh. If they don't push him back to face the Cubs, then he'd likely start the 1 game playoff against the Mets.
The Dodgers actually have Billingsly scheduled to pitch on the last Sunday. If they are one up on the DBs, then I could see them holding off Billingsly to pitch in the playoff game.
Ths NLCS is slated to start on Wednesday Oct 1st with game 2 on Thursday. Neither pitcher would likely to be ready to pitch on Thursday (well, maybe Sabathia) if they had pitched on Monday. This gives the possibility that you would only face their best pitcher once in the playoffs and their 3rd or even 4th best pitcher an extra time.
I am hoping that the Mets and Brewers tie, we see a CC/Santana game where the Brewers win and then have to come into Philly expecting CC to only pitch in game 3. If the Mets take the WC, I am hoping the Dodgers beat the Diamondbacks in a 1 game playoff with Billingsly pitching just because the DBs have 3 viabale starters compared to the Dodgers (who do have Kuroda though). On a personal level, I'd love to see the Mets make it and then play the Phillies in the NLCS, but I'd much prefer the advantage of missing the other team's best starter and having an easier road to the second round.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Brewers
I’d rather not face Milwaukee in round 1, not only due to the one-two punch of Sabathia (maybe the best pitcher in the majors right now) and Sheets, but also because of their lineup. They just kill lefties: .273/.353/.470 as a team, as opposed to .247/.317/.421 vs RHP. Doesn’t seem like a good matchup for our rotation. Bring on the Dodgers, please.
I’m thinking almost entirely from a starting pitching standpoint, but let’s assume Sheets is healthy and couch it in these terms: which rotation would you least want to see?
Sabathia
Sheets
Bush
Suppan
Billingsley
Maddux
Lowe
Kuroda
Webb
Haren
Johnson
Davis
The D’Backs scare me most, followed by the Brewers, then the Dodgers. The back end of the Brewers rotation isn’t anything special, but both they and the D’Backs have a potent 1-2 punch at the top — which is potentially deadly in a short series. L.A.‘s rotation is solid, but it’s not as scary in a short series as the other two, at least in my opinion. If we eliminate Arizona from the discussion (their playoff odds are only at 10.6%), then let’s compare the Dodgers and Brewers exclusively…
Rotation: Advantage Brewers (in a short series)
Bullpen: Advantage Dodgers
Lineup: Advantage Brewers (as Seth mentioned above)
Plus you have this simple fact: while the Brewers have been in a swoon, they’ll need to play some damn good baseball over the next week to make the playoffs at this point. And we saw last year what happens if you play a hot Wild Card team…
A couple of additional points re: the Dodgers. First, if the D’Backs can push the Dodgers to the end — making Sunday’s game a must-win for L.A. — then the Dodgers will have to pitch Billingsley on Sunday, making him unavailable until Game 3 next Saturday (he’s never really started on 3 days rest at the ML level). Secondly, I know the Phils touched him up back on August 23, but I’d honestly rather not see Kershaw, and I’m banking on the Dodgers pushing him to the bullpen for the playoffs.
I think if the Brewers make it, Sabathia will have pitched either on Sunday or Monday. Sheets is a great arm but doesn’t scare me right now, between his health issues and the fact that the Phils handled him a couple weeks back.
So with that in mind, I think my very slight preference would be Milwaukee.
I’m inclined to agree with you. We manhandled them in the sweep, and they really didn’t have any weapons that made me sit up and say “wow!” Sheets was not overpowering, and Sabathia is starting to decline a bit as a result of his massive and relentless workload. I would also prefer the Brewers.
Also, I heard that Maddux may not be on the Dodger’s postseason roster. Truth?

by 
























