Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 143 Results: Winners, Losers, And Other Thoughts

The 2009 World Series: The Boring One

We're now on our second day post-World Series, and I can't fight off this nagging feeling that the championship series I just watched was, well, pretty damn boring.

Yes, it was a World Series, and with the Phillies' long record of futility, there's really no ground for complaining when the team just makes it to the post-season, let alone to the World Series.  But, in the context of a best-of-7 match for the best team in baseball, it's hard to say that this Series had much going for it.

Sure, this was the first World Series to go past 6 games since 2003.  And the Yankees won their first championship in their new stadium.  And Chase Utley tied the record for most home runs in a World Series.  And Hideki Matsui was dominant.  And Mariano Rivera was, well, Mariano Rivera.  But all of those things added in with the rest of the Series just didn't add up to anything exciting or memorable.

The best way to capture this sentiment is the following:  over the course of the six games, there were 2 lead changes.  That's it.  Even worse is that both of them occurred in drabs over the course of the middle innings.  Otherwise, once a team took the lead in this series, the other team never got ahead.  Of course, this doesn't mean that it wasn't good baseball, but it does mean that from a fan's perspective, this isn't particularly exciting baseball.

The overall series momentum also didn't provide much excitement.  The Phillies took the early 1-0 lead, but then the Yankees won 3 in a row.  Had the Phillies won their second in Game 4 instead of Game 5, the Series would have taken on a new level of excitement.  But, that's not what happened, and by the time the Phillies had 2 wins, the Yankees were heading home looking for one to clinch.  Momentum really didn't shift, and the Series ended as it seemed it would without any real surprise.

Looking at the particulars of each game confirms this, as only Game 4 had much real excitement.  Yet, even that excitement lasted only a very short period of time.  Here are each of the games re-capped, along with the mostly uni-directional win probability graphs.  I've also given each game an excitement ranking on a 1 to 10 scale, with 10 being Joe-Carter-Game-6-in-1993 exciting and 1 being a mid-August Pirates/Padres 6-2 snooze-fest:

Star-divide

Game 1:  Cliff Lee dominated the Yankees, holding them to one unearned run.  That's a wonderful pitching performance, but it's not high drama.  Chase Utley's two home runs against CC Sabathia were exciting, but the rest of the offense was dormant until the last two innings.  And, at that point, the game was pretty much over.  The Yankees had no chance against Lee, and the graph below shows it.  The only thing going for the game on the excitement meter was that it was Game 1, which seemed like a big deal at the time.  Excitement factor: 6.

20091028_phillies_yankees_0_medium

via www.fangraphs.com

Game 2:  One of our two lead-change games, the Phillies took an early lead, but then Pedro Martinez slowly gave it back, one run at a time, until the Yankees had a lead that Mariano Rivera protected with a 2 inning save.  The lead change was exciting, as was some good pitching from Martinez and A.J. Burnett, but the drip-drip run-scoring from the Yankees along with the certitude of the Rivera save worked against this game having much excitement to it.  The steady incline of the win probably graph confirms this.  Excitement factor: 4.

20091029_phillies_yankees_0_medium

Game 3:  Here we get out second, and last, lead change of the Series.  The Phillies took an early 3-0 lead behind a dominant Cole Hamels.  But then it all fell apart in the middle innings, as the Yankees outscored the Phillies 8-1 over the course of innings 4 through 8.  The Phillies' feeble comeback just assured another Rivera shut-down appearance in the ninth.  This game was over in the fifth, and the entire stadium knew it (and the graph confirms).  Excitement factor:  3.

20091031_yankees_phillies_0_medium

Game 4:  This was the only high-drama game of the Series.  The Phillies staged a late inning comeback against Sabathia and Joba Chamberlain, who looked great in the eighth inning until Pedro Feliz shockingly tied the game with a home run.  Brad Lidge entered the ninth and looked great as well, but followed Chamberlain's pattern of not being able to put away the last batter.  Lidge allowed 3 in the ninth, and another Rivera appearance assured the Yankees' third win.  This is the only win probably graph with much of a jagged edge.  Excitement factor: 8.

20091101_yankees_phillies_0_medium

Game 5:  This game was over early, as the Phillies took a big lead with Cliff Lee pitching.  He wasn't as sharp as Game 1, but he was pitching well enough and the offense put up enough runs that the game was not much in doubt.  The Yankees did mount a bit of a comeback and made the ninth inning tense, but it was too little, too late.  That ninth inning comeback rescues this game from a 1, as the virtually flatlined win probably graph would seem to merit.  Excitement factor: 4.

20091102_yankees_phillies_0_medium

Game 6:  This was the worst of the bunch.  The only thing it had going for it was that it was Hideki Matsui's 6 RBI and that it was the last game.  Otherwise, the Yankees took an early lead, the Phillies' hitters couldn't hit with men on, and everyone knew Rivera was going to come in for more than 3 outs, possibly 6.  He ultimately came in for 5 outs and closed the door to finish the Series, as we all knew he would.  The graph below merits a 1 on the excitement scale, but the championship win boosts this game, but only slightly as it was a complete bore.  Excitement factor: 2.

20091104_phillies_yankees_0_medium

The average excitement factor here is 4.5 on a 10 point scale.  Of course, this is an arbitrary and subjective scale, but take a look at the fangraphs collectively and note the extreme absence of much fluctuation at all.  There's no two ways about it: this was a boring series.

Of course, I'd feel completely different had the Phillies won it all . . . .

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I mostly agree. But Game 2 was pretty tense, with a lot of questionable decisions on both sides; I watched that one with a good friend who’s a Yankees fan, and he hated Rivera coming in for the two innings. Rollins worked a great AB against him, and you had the blown call on Utley for a double play that ended the Phils’ threat in the 8th. (Of course, they’d been the beneficiaries of an arguably even worse call in the bottom of the 7th.)

Game Five was a party for most of the way that nearly turned into a nightmare—the sort of excitement we didn’t really want. And I couldn’t agree more about Game Six—as soon as Matsui got Pedro for the second time to make it 4-1, it felt over.

by dajafi on Nov 6, 2009 11:29 AM EST reply actions  

It's all relative though

I think the only reason those moments in Game 2 were exciting in retrospect is because the rest of the series provided so little in the way of excitement.

by David S. Cohen on Nov 6, 2009 11:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I also think, if you were a baseball fan, and not a fan of one specific team, Game 2 would have been pretty dull.

by Cormican on Nov 6, 2009 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Completely Disagree

I understand looking at the Series from a macro level it was boring, but looking at each game there were multiple at bats that were battles in themselves, with the series and momentum rocking back and forth on each pitch and simple grounder. Almost every hitter in the series with the exception of Feliz or Beardo had the chance to hit a HR or get into scoring position.

I was on the edge of my seat for this Series as much, if not more than last year, simply because last year it seemed like we were going to win, and the Rays just were second tier and a speed bump towards the inevitable. The fact that it was so new, and uncharted territory for a celebration made it great. This Series was back and forth struggle for power every inning. Unfortunately the Yanks took more of these critical moments than we did, and that gave them the edge per game and ultimately the Series. We’ll be back and I hope the games will be just as exciting as this, if not more with the Phils reclaiming their title as WFC for the second time in 3 years.

by ajr142 on Nov 6, 2009 11:32 AM EST reply actions  

But then every moment of almost every game in baseball is exciting by your definition. And hey, maybe you feel that way, which is great. I agree that every moment of almost every baseball game is enjoyable, as that’s why I’m a huge baseball fan. But, I think excitement is something different. Just because a team could do something to change the momentum at any moment doesn’t make things exciting. To me, it has to happen, and then happen again and again for a series to take on the level of excitement or memorableness that we’ve seen in the past. Yes, we lost 1993, but that was one damn exciting series. And last year played over the backdrop of the team and city’s long-standing futility. But this year? What are you going to remember from this series five years from now? I can’t say I’ll remember anything, other than maybe Cliff Lee’s calm on the mound in Game 1.

by David S. Cohen on Nov 6, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

it’s not necessarily every play per se, but it’s the potential excitement of each play upcoming.
But i found it exciting in the 8th of game 2 with our chance to push some runs across on Rivera, and by your definition, it wasn’t exciting because no runs were scored and the lead didnt change hands. Exciting baseball doesn’t always end with runs being scored. It’s “enjoyable” during the regular season when you can lose one here and there, maybe zone out for a game or 2, but when its the playoffs, let alone the world series, each play matters.

Unfortunately this year, along with remembering Lee’s dominance in Gm 1 and strong Gm 5, I’ll remember Lidge giving up 3, Damon’s double steal, Hamels not being the Hamels of 2008, and Jeter being really good. Now 4 of those 5 listed memories are negative, they are what helped decide the series.

by ajr142 on Nov 6, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

The problem is, I’m afraid this will be remembered as an “exciting Series” due to all the off-the-field crap that real baseball fans don’t care about (Pedro vs. Yankees, “Amtrak Series” hype, zOMG 27!).

In other words… due to hype related to the Yankees’ off-field flotsam.

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Nov 6, 2009 11:45 AM EST reply actions  

Exactly

Which is exactly my point — the games themselves were just blah for the most part. And the zOMG 27 will be forgotten once there’s a zOMG 28, 29, etc. Maybe it’ll be remembered long-term as the first win in the new Yankee stadium, but beyond that, not much.

by David S. Cohen on Nov 6, 2009 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

unfortunately i live north of the philly/new york split in nj...

and all the talk everywhere was about pedro. it was beyond beating a dead horse.

by sixrfan on Nov 6, 2009 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s because they likely didn’t know the names of any of the other players on the Phillies…

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I posit, it’s because the most important thing to Yankees fans is the Red Sox. Even after they won the WS, PA had an entire article about how to best rub it a Red Sox fan face via text message.

by Cormican on Nov 6, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s just sad.

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

My thought exactly. Dumbest SBN “article” I’ve ever seen.

by Cormican on Nov 6, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

They were also discussing tips on how to rub it in against us. One suggestion was to inform us all that Chase Utley is just a Yankee waiting to happen, as soon as his contract expires.

by taco pal on Nov 6, 2009 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I saw that too. But, at least they were playing us. I could understand rubbing that in. The Red Sox obsession seemed out of place and mildly pathetic.

by Cormican on Nov 6, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I remember last season after the Phils won the WS, there were a fair amount of NYM fans that came onto the blogs to tell us the the title was invalid because the Phils lost the regular season series against the Mets.

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

But wait – I thought it was us who were obsessed with them? You don’t mean those accusations were just projection???

by taco pal on Nov 6, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly—rivalries don’t exist in a vacuum.

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Utley to the Yanks will never happen. He will retire a Phillie or go to LA.

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Seriously?

Who knows the future, but why wouldn’t he go to the Yankees if he becomes a free agent and can’t get a contract he wants anywhere else but the Yankees offer him an absurd amount? We have no reason to believe he’s “above” that.

by David S. Cohen on Nov 6, 2009 1:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know

But it’s what I want to see happen. I just get sick of the NYY fans retort that if they like a player on another team that beats them, they’ll just go out and buy him.

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, but god forbid you mention that as a reason they won the WS. Guaranteed shit fit.

by Cormican on Nov 6, 2009 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

My boss tried to gloat about the win to me—she’s a NYY fan—and I told her it’s about time that $200 million bought them a championship. She hasn’t spoken to me since. She’s at the parade today and I told her if I receive one stinking photo in my inbox, I’ll quit on the spot. She thinks I’m kidding.

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Send he a picture of Jeter in a Red Sox uni. Her head will explode.

by Cormican on Nov 6, 2009 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Well if you’re not kidding than I question your sanity and rationality..

Don't frack with me or you'll get a punch in the kidneys...you've been warned

by jemagee on Nov 6, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

The main reason why I’d doubt it is that the Yankees already have Cano, who’s younger than Utley and very good in his own right. They would probably be able to better allocate their resources somewhere else.

Plausible or not, though, the suggestion remains unimaginably assholish.

by taco pal on Nov 6, 2009 1:57 PM EST up reply actions  

They get mad when you tell them the Yanks buy their championships but then they gleefully tell you they will overpay your best players when they hit the market in order to take them away from you. They can’t have it both ways.

by doubleh on Nov 6, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

If they want to overpay for Utley’s decline years, let them.

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Nov 6, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Please tell me that’s not gonna happen…Oh God, I might have to stop watching baseball all together if that happens. It would just hurt too much.

by FuquaManuel on Nov 6, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Neither Chase Utley, Ryan Howard, Shane Victorino, Cole Hamels or Carlos Ruiz will spend their entire careers as phillies.

Root for the uniform – it’s easier

Don't frack with me or you'll get a punch in the kidneys...you've been warned

by jemagee on Nov 6, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I got the sense that either team was capable of getting at the other one at just about any time, but for the most part, it didn’t happen. Game 4 the only real exception. All comebacks were of the almost but not quite variety. And it was also walk-off free. In the context of our previous two series, you’re right—but those are pretty rare events.

by Wet Luzinski on Nov 6, 2009 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

Rarity

That would be an interesting study. How often do World Series’ win probability graphs look like the six above, compared to what I’m sure the 1993 Series looked like, or the 1980 Houston Astros playoff round looked like.

by David S. Cohen on Nov 6, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Personally, I thought Games 1 and 5 were uber-exciting, whereas Games 2, 3, 4, and 6, however, sucked beyond all description.

by taco pal on Nov 6, 2009 12:32 PM EST reply actions  

Hmmmm…. I sense some pattern here.

by David S. Cohen on Nov 6, 2009 12:33 PM EST up reply actions  

He favors games divisible by the primes 2 and 3 but not 1 and 5?

Don't frack with me or you'll get a punch in the kidneys...you've been warned

by jemagee on Nov 6, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

So, switch that

Don't frack with me or you'll get a punch in the kidneys...you've been warned

by jemagee on Nov 6, 2009 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

From a Yankee fan perspective...

Seeing Chase Utley on deck with Rollins behind him and a man on second was a little too exciting in inning 9 of game six, bordering on terrifying. Maybe it was the 9 years since the last WS win. Or maybe it was knowing how good Utley was (and how good Rollins can be). Or maybe it was that the Phillies was driving Mo’s pitch count north of 40. Or that the Phillies were defending champs. Just my 2 cts.

by coops2001 on Nov 7, 2009 2:56 PM EST reply actions  

"Maybe it was the 9 years since the last WS win."

Must have been torture!

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Nov 7, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

God forbid Yankees fans be forced to endure 25 years between championships. The world might stop turning!

Entitled schmucks.

by FuquaManuel on Nov 7, 2009 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

You're right

Utley’s meager .286 WS average should not have had me worred. My bad.

by coops2001 on Nov 8, 2009 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Or the 97 years between when the Phillies were formed and when they won their first championship.

Actually, I wouldn’t mind the Yankees not winning another one until 2106.

"When you make your final stand
I'll be right there
I'll never leave
And all I ask of you is
Believe"

by The Dark on Nov 9, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I thought 2009 was an entertaiing and well played series.

Lots of HRs, good pitching, and close games.

Phils taking it to 6 was still impressive although they lost.

In the past 87 years, only 11 NL teams have made the WS 2 years in a row. Only the 76 Reds won.

Great to see Utley tie Reggie’s record.

I call him Mr November.

by WarWolf on Nov 7, 2009 4:33 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.

Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

198222_nlds_reds_phillies_baseball_small FuquaManuel

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Phillyfriar__new2__small PhillyFriar

Associate Blog Lords

Bugs_small taco pal

Greg_luzinski_small Wet Luzinski

Cptjackalbatross_small RememberthePhitans

Phillies1980logo_small schmenkman

Madmen_icon_small lizroscher

Blogger Emeritus

Colevatar_small Matt Swartz