A Pitch for Kyle Kendrick
Each of the four candidates for that last spot in the Phillies' starting rotation offers a pretty interesting baseball story. J.A. Happ, the rookie left-hander who probably starts camp as the front-runner for the job, looks like a power pitcher at six and a half feet tall, but his style of setting up hitters with location and deception rather than blowing them away is more suggestive of the Northwestern University grad he is. Chan Ho Park, the team's big offseason addition on the pitching side, carries the stigma of having signed one of the worst contracts in baseball history but took a first stride toward redemption with a big season for the Dodgers in 2008. Carlos Carrasco, the phenom of the bunch, is generally regarded as a front-of-the-rotation talent, but has yet to show the consistency and mental toughness he'll need to thrive in the majors.
Then there's Kyle Kendrick, who has probably a better recent track record than any of them as well as perhaps the lowest expectations. The 24 year-old sinker specialist has a 21-13 career record and started Game Two of the 2007 playoffs for the Phillies as a rookie; he won 18 of his first 37 big-league starts, against 7 losses. But the peripherals were never there, as Kendrick averaged less than a strikeout every two innings; he pitched in exceptionally good fortune with runners on base through his first full season or so in the majors, and then suddenly he didn't. By September 2008, he was out of the rotation, and he watched the playoffs with as little bearing on the outcome as you or I. (Unlike Adam Eaton, however, he did go to the parade.)
Kendrick was somewhat babied through his first major-league spring training in 2008--other than the now-legendary traded-to-Japan prank, of course--suggesting that manager Charlie Manuel and pitching coach Rich Dubee were perhaps more concerned with sustaining Kendrick's confidence than pushing him to excel out of the gate. He pitched in a number of minor-league exhibitions last spring, and was hit hard in several games against big-league clubs. But after two shaky starts to begin the season, he was effective for about four months before collapsing in the last third of the year. This year, though, he's coming to camp with no guarantees, and he seems to know it.
Whether Kendrick will make it or not likely depends on whether he can master a changeup to complement his signature sinking fastball. He claims to have thrown the pitch "every day" this winter, and undoubtedly its progress or lack thereof will be the focus of attention from Manuel and Dubee.
Looking at Kendrick's most comparable pitchers from Baseball-Reference suggests that there might be more grounds for optimism than many of us probably suspect. Kendrick's single best comp through age 23 is former teammate (and namesake) Kyle Lohse, whose first couple seasons do indeed bear a resemblance. Lohse developed a couple decent offerings to go along with his fastball, as Kendrick now must do. A bit further down the list is Jason Jennings, who had a few strong seasons for Colorado in the first half of this decade before lighting out for the Lone Star State, where his baseball fortunes sagged. And number 10 on Kendrick's comp list is Chris Carpenter, who shook off early-career inconsistency to eventually claim a Cy Young Award.
None of which is to say that Kendrick is very likely to start the season in the Phillies' rotation. But given the heavy workloads of the top four starters last season, some injuries are unfortunately likely, with resultant opportunities for one or more of this spring's also-rans. Two years ago, Kyle Kendrick came out of nowhere in just such a scenario to help lift the team into the playoffs; it wouldn't be a total shock to see that happen again.
0 recs |
6 comments
|
Comments
Kendrick’s problem last season went beyond not striking guys out and getting clubbed by lefties in my view. He really lost all command and control of his pitches. And his stuff isn’t nearly good enough to get away with that.
It seems to me that when he has good command, is keeping the ball down and minimizing walking guys, he can (and has been) effective. But he had none of that last year in the second half.
It’s tough to get by in the big leagues without striking guys out. Happ is much better than Kendrick in this regard and is therefore the favorite to win the 5th starter job (unless the Phils get dazzled by Park I guess). It will be interesting though, to see how Kendrick’s future plays out here.
I saw what you saw with Kendrick. I’ve always had the idea that maybe he could be a decent situational reliever even with his current strengths and limitations, considering that maybe in shorter stints he’d get a little more on his fastball. But as Friar says below, maybe a better alternative to that is sending him down to start the year and seeing how he develops.
The command struck me as probably a confidence thing. I remember his body language was pretty awful in his last ten starts or so, and he had some real meltdown innings.
Nice piece, dajafi. I’m a big believer that Kendrick needs to go to Triple-A to sort out his issues, but he shouldn’t lose heart; as you said, he’ll probably be needed at some point this year. Happ quite literally has no developing to do at the minor league level, but Kyle can benefit a great deal from honing his offspeed offerings in Lehigh Valley.
Bill Baer over at Crashburn Alley had an interesting suggestion: instead of a change up, why not teach Kendrick a splitter? (See the discussion in the comments below this post.) Even with an effective change up, odds are against Kendrick ever becoming a big strikeout guy — so why not aim to make him an extreme groundball pitcher instead?
Finally, they’re certainly still trying to pump Kyle’s confidence up: Dubee has gone on record as saying, "For me, he’s the leading guy going in because of what he’s done for two years."
Yeah, I just saw that comment from Dubee. Nothing wrong with that, given that I can’t imagine Kendrick deciding he’s guaranteed a job and electing to cruise into the season…
Crashburn makes a decent case on the splitter/changeup point, though I would guess that part of the skill of developing a change is mastering the deception aspect of it. For obvious reasons, I’m probably now more inclined than I was a year or two ago to give the Phils the staff the benefit of the doubt on a decision like that.
Just my personal opinion
I’ve felt, based on nothing more than my “experience” watching baseball, that successful pitchers that don’t have the Gift of Gab (like Cole Hamels, Johan Santana, Jake Peavy, etc.) need to have a pitch that changes the hitter’s eye level (i.e. for Kendrick, a four-seam fastball could complement his sinking two-seamer) and a pitch that changes speeds (i.e. for Kendrick, a change-up complements his fastball).
The problem is that his non-fastball stuff just isn’t good. It’s something that can be worked on of course (as Dajafi mentioned, the biggest part about a change-up is the deception), but it might be easier just to pick up a splitter. Again, based on nothing more than my subjective experience, I believe that splitters are very easy to learn and only slightly harder to master.
You have to throw about a million change-ups (note: exaggeration) before you can start throwing it at your best on a consistent basis. I think that if Kendrick picked up a splitter, he could have it as a fearsome part of his repertoire by the end of the season.
And to reiterate, I don’t have any data to back up what I’m saying. I could very well be completely wrong about this and it’d prove why I write about the game instead of play it (that and the fact that I get winded walking up a flight of stairs). However, I feel pretty confident that the only thing between Kendrick and #3-ish status is one decent pitch to work off of his fastball.
That’s not something you work on while making starts as a Major Leaguer, though.
http://crashburnalley.com/
by Crashburn Alley on Feb 16, 2009 12:12 AM EST reply actions
Tough to take issue with any of that, particularly the last two sentences.
Again, I don’t disagree so much about the splitter as I feel I don’t know enough to say loudly either way. I wonder if maybe he’s tried the splitter at some point in his development and it just didn’t take, for whatever reason; this is the sort of thing we could have asked Mike Radano, if only the newspaper business didn’t suck so hard.

by 






















