Thoughts on the NL East Race
I don't think this is worth bumping any of the excellent content my colleagues have added off the top of the front page, but thought people might be interested in this quick response to Baseball Prospectus' ranking of the top 10 teams in the game, which featured the Phillies at #10, the Braves at #5, and the Mets at #3 (top in the National League). I posted a slightly different version of this comment on the page.
***
Unless there's specific reason to believe otherwise--something like ESPN football commentator Merrill Hoge loathing the Eagles because his career ended in pain on the Vet Stadium turf--I don't often buy the "bias" accusation. In the case of BP's Joe Sheehan, it really makes no sense; BP markets itself to all baseball fans in all markets, and even if Sheehan, or any BP writer, has a personal bias against any club, he or she probably would take extra care to keep it off the page. (As "partisan" bloggers, happily, we don't have this problem; I friggin' detest the Braves, a lot of my colleagues similarly loathe the Mets, and that's how we roll.) Again regarding BP and Sheehan, I particularly respect anyone who's willing to risk being egregiously wrong by predicting won/lost records for every club in the big leagues.
That said, a few aspects of his NL East predictions don't make much sense either. Sheehan's comment that the Phils "don't have much room to grow offensively," for one thing, ignores that none of the team's best three hitters approached their career-best seasons last year. In the case of middle infielders Jimmy Rollins and Chase Utley, we know that neither were 100 percent healthy for the balance of the season. As for Ryan Howard, whom Sheehan has absurdly and inaccurately labeled as a "platoon player" in light of his supposed struggles against left-handed pitchers, he was as unlucky last year on BABIP as he was lucky in 2006; his true level probably lies in between those two seasons, even factoring in the shift teams now always employ against him. Carlos Ruiz was similarly unfortunate on balls in play. I think the Phils' runs scored will come closer to 850 than the 819 Joe predicts.
My concerns as a fan are with Cole Hamels' health, Jamie Moyer's continued effectiveness, regression to the mean from the bullpen, and whether new GM Ruben Amaro can be as creative and effective patching in-season as former top executive Pat Gillick was. Cole can't be replaced, but otherwise they should have some options; any of J.A. Happ, Carlos Carrasco, and Kyle Kendrick, losers in the fifth-starter competition to Chan Ho Park, could have made a half-dozen other rotations, and the bullpen depth at AAA is comforting as well.
Regarding the Braves, I fail to grasp how Sheehan (correctly) rips their punchless outfield all off-season, then pencils them in for 799 runs, 91 wins, and a wild-card berth. Unless Larry Jones Jr has added bionic parts, it's not going to happen. Atlanta's rotation is certainly much-improved, and they're due for better bullpen health and some better luck. But with a lot of weak bats and injury risks, and facing tough divisional competition, I think the Braves will fall within a few games of .500 either way.
As for the Mets love... well, who knows where that comes from. I guess if one has great faith in Carlos Delgado and Fernando Tatis repeating what they did last year, and Luis Castillo shedding five years, and Oliver Perez finding the strike zone, and Mike Pelfrey and John Maine combining to make 55 starts, and the team not needing to reach into their farm system for injury replacements or trade depth, sure they could roll to the division title. Doesn't seem the way to bet, though.
I've written before that the Phillies were the beneficiaries of some good fortune last season, though I think their luck didn't really kick in until the playoffs started. And I'll concede that the Braves in particular had terrible luck--with injuries, with one-run outcomes, with unexpectedly awful performances from the likes of Jeff Francoeur--in 2008. But counting on regression on both counts seems like another version of the Gambler's Fallacy, an idea of which people as smart as Joe Sheehan could be expected to steer well clear.
23 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very well stated, my friend.
The Braves are certainly much-improved from last year, especially the rotation, but I likewise have serious concerns about their less-than-inpsiring bullpen and their offensive production if Chipper spends any appreciable length of time on the DL (and when’s the last time that failed to happen?).
The one area in which the Phils can legitimately expect a regression is health: I don’t foresee another season in which no starting pitchers hit the DL (Adam Eaton and his mental problems don’t count), and while Moyer/Park/Happ could prove to be somewhat replaceable for a stretch, the same can’t be said for Hamels and (a hopefully focused) Myers. But you’re right in saying that the offense shouldn’t really be any worse; downturns from Victorino and Werth should be more than compensated for by improved seasons from Rollins, Howard, and even Ruiz to an extent.
I’ve got the Mets winning the division in a tight race, but you’ve done a good job highlighting their issues as well. Unless Niese makes a quantum leap, the Mets don’t have the pitching depth to withstand any real injuries to their rotation. Furthermore, the supporting cast around their superstars (Castillo, Schneider, Church, Delgado, Murphy) all have serious question marks surrounding them.
Would it shock me to see the Phillies miss the playoffs? No. It wouldn’t even shock me to see us finish 3rd, provided some injuries befall the club. But I will indeed be shocked if both the Mets and Braves by more than 5 games apiece.
Yeah, I probably undersold the Mets a little in the above. Probably their top five players are as good as or even a tiny bit better than ours. But between the five names you mentioned and Perez/Maine/Pelfrey in the rotation, they’re counting on a lot of people who seem fairly likely to decline, get hurt, or both.
It’s over – the phils are screwed – they will be pwned by the braves all season long – probably the mets and nationals too – sigh – i was so looking forward to this season
"Someone created the box score," Morey says, "and he should be shot."
Blocked shots — they look great, but unless you secure the ball afterward, you haven’t helped your team all that much.
by jemagee on Apr 5, 2009 10:42 PM EDT reply actions
The Braves scored the 3rd most runs in the NL last season after the All-Star Break (ie. only like 10 games with Tex) and everyone from that lineup returns. Certainly Chipper won’t be as good as he was last season, but Francoeur cannot possible be any worse (I hope), Schafer has the potential to be better than anything we threw in CF last season, and as much as I hate Garret Anderson he should be better than what we had in LF last season…especially if Cox platoons him correct with Diaz (which I fear may not happen).
If you’re gonna rip us you should at least do the proper research. Good luck tonight.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
Oh please
I’m sure you’d never speak ill of the Phillies without knowing every last nuance of a team that you only watch 18 times a year or so?
Actually I have Extra Innings so I watch them all the time, but nice try.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 7, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Well you’re a far more dedicated fan than us.
I’ll admit I’ve undersold the Braves’ offense a bit. I’m not saying that because of the last two games, either — I think I’ve realized that comparing an offense to the Phillies, finding it inferior, and then saying that it’s completely flawed isn’t a fair assessment (given how strong the Philly lineup is).
Nonetheless, I think the point stands: the much-improved Atlanta rotation is the deepest in the division, but the bullpen is a question mark (losing Ohman means there isn’t a reliable lefty aside from Gonzalez), and if Chipper goes down for any appreciable length of time (which isn’t exactly unlikely), then the offense is in trouble. I’m skeptical of Schafer’s ability to handle the double-jump offensively — not to cry foul, but it’s likely that his best minor league season was HGH-driven, after all — and while Francoeur has to bounce back, I don’t buy him as a .290/.340/.450 guy anymore (maybe a .260/.310/.410 guy).
I realize you can very easily poke holes in the 2009 Phillies in the same manner, but my point is this: for us to not know that Atlanta finished 3rd in the NL in runs after the All-Star break isn’t exactly failure to do proper research.
An informed post, thank you for responding. Let me retort if you don’t mind:
- You’re 100% right about not having a proper LOOGY. I personally don’t want Gonzo as our closer, especially since Bobby will only specifically use him in the 9th inning instead of the most high leverage situation like he should. Much rather have Soriano in that role so that Gonzo can be used in instances when guys like Utley, Howard, Ibanez are coming up. O’Flaherty looked destined to give up a bomb to Stairs last night, but he settled down afterwards…I’m still not sold on him. With that being said Soriano, Moylan, and Gonzalez are underrated to many, mainly because of the very injury questions marks you mention. Signing Anderson/Glavine instead of Ohman was a major mistake.
- Not to get into semantics, but it was never proven that Schafer actually took the HGH only that he purchased it. I don’t expect the average fan to know that…most people just hear that he was associated and automatically assume that he’s guilty. I’d probably do the same if it was one of your prospects. But I digress, my point is that he went .269/.378/.471 last season after that whole fiasco went down…that’s damn good considering he provides GG defense in the field. Sizemore posted similar numbers in AA, and many scouts and stat-heads project Schafer as a poor man’s Sizemore.
- I hate Francouer. Can’t stand guy’s that have no plate discipline and he’s the poster child. His two above average seasons were helped by huge BABIP, while his two awful seasons were sunk by low BABIP…so it’s hard to tell what kind of hitter he really is. I hold out hope that this “new stance” will work (although I have yet to see much of a difference) but we’ll have to wait and see. I think he’ll end up this season with something like .260/.320./430. It won’t matter soon though, cause hopefully Heyward will continue to progress and we can kick Francoeur to the curb.
I understand that not every fan is going to know everyone stat, but I feel when someone runs their mouth and makes disparaging comments about something they should do the necessary research to make sure they’re not talking out of their ass. If someone made up something about you guys over on TC I’d be the first person to correct them. Any knowledgeable fan is my friend, and the more we have the better it is for the game.
Anywho…good luck tonight.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 8, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Nobody made up anything
If you just came on here and said “I think you’re underrating the Braves’ offense” you wouldn’t be getting any flack. People might disagree with you, but that’s not the same thing.
Instead you accuse someone of not doing proper research, when at most the OP may have overlooked a subset of the data (post-ASB offense). And of course the significance of that subset is questionable, as taco pal has pointed out.
You’re not adding anything to the discussion so I’ll choose to ignore you and converse with people who actually bring something to the table.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 8, 2009 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
While the Braves did, in fact, score the third-most runs in the NL after the ASB last year, they also posted only the eighth-best OPS during that time period. I suspect that a lot of their success had to do with (a) dumb luck, and (b) Chipper Jones’ ridiculous .466 OBP, which he is unlikely to come anywhere close to repeating over a full season this year.
If you want to call it dumb luck that’s your prerogative…others might call it timely hitting if you believe in such a thing, and I’ve already made mention of Chipper’s season last year…he certainly won’t repeat, but we have added several players who are improvements over what we had last year.
I’m not saying we have a juggernaut of a lineup…we certainly don’t…but it’s not as punch less as the OP makes it out to be. We’ve got several people with 15 HR potential (Johnson, Schafer, Kotchman, Anderson) and a couple that profile to possibly hit 20+ HR (McCann, Chipper, Francoeur). Escobar hit 10 HR last year also, and the majority of those hitters have the ability to post average to above average OBP…not including Anderson and Francoeur of course.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 8, 2009 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions
Timely hitting happens because of luck and isn’t repeatable except with more luck.
Your lineup is average to slightly above average. The OP didn’t say that your lineup is punchless, he said that your outfield is punchless, which, by outfield standards, it is.
Some of your hitters will do better this year, but the flukiness of Chipper Jones’ 2008 is a big deal and not something you can just brush off. You also won’t have Martin Prado putting up a .384 OBP over the course of an entire season this year.
I watched the games, and trust me we didn’t have an abundance of good luck. But if you want to continue believing so be my guest.
My comment about a punch less lineup was in reference to his remark about “alot of weak bats”. If we have an average to above average offense, as you admitted, I don’t see how we’ll finish a few games above .500
With any luck Prado won’t have to play at any length of time this season. Infante will fill in for Chipper, and barring injury Prado will continue to merely be a backup for Johnson/Escobar. Of course Cox will feel the need to start Prado against the tougher LH’s in the league, but I’m hoping that will be kept to a minimum.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 8, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
I think you are missing my point about Prado. It actually turned out to be a good thing for you that he played so much in the second half of last year, because he played great. Obviously, he is not going to duplicate that performance so getting him out of the lineup is the right call. But you shouldn’t expect this to result in an improvement over last year.
Regarding the points made below, no doubt Jones is a very good hitter, but there’s a big difference between .420 and .470.
I’m not arguing that it wasn’t a good thing that Prado played…I’m saying that I don’t want him to play any long period of time this year because the chances of him repeating are slim. I’m in agreement with you on that.
But you shouldn’t expect this to result in an improvement over last year.
I’m not? I never specifically mentioned Prado until you did. I’m expecting the improvements to come in RF, CF, and LF…and while they’re still all pretty damn crappy when compared to other teams…the in house improvements will be welcomed. One would venture a guess that 1B, 2B, SS, and C may also improve as they’ve aged another season and none are even close to their decline phase.
The .050 difference in OBP is obviously a very big deal, but I would expect Francoeur, Escobar, Johnson, and Kotchman to all improve in the OBP department. Question for you though…I know there is a calculation that is used to determine exactly how many runs the differences in OPS can be, do you happen to know it? I’d be interested to see how many runs the difference would be from Chipper’s actual year last season, to what you thought it should have been…with everything else staying the same.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 8, 2009 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions
i’m very bearish on francoeur and very bullish in chipper based on my own research (which is mostly on BABIP lately). francoeur has a lot of traits associated with low babip rather than average or high. he pops out a lot. he is not particular fast. he does not spread the ball around all that well. he swings at a lot of pitches out the strike zone. his contact rate is poor. all of those things are associated with bad babip on flyballs (infield flies), bad babip on groundballs (lack of infield hits without reaching on errors enough to make you call that into question; also bad contact rate and bad plate discipline means chopping a lot of groundballs rather than making solid contact), and his babip on line drives is pretty much good as expected, since he has good power. that amount to a lowish babip. with poor contact and unspectacular power, i think .260/.310/.410 is about right.
chipper is simply an incredible hitter, and there’s nothing about his high babips that indicate he is much of a fluke. he rarely pops out, has excellent power, he has good contact skills, a great eye, and spreads the ball around reasonably well. his babip from last year isn’t gonna stay at .383 or anything but chipper really should be in line for a .330/.420/.520 kind of season. of course, he could get hurt, which would be nice for the phillies’ chances.
mccann is a beast too. and i’m reasonably bullish about escobar and kelly johnson too.
but the outfield looks awful. they have almost no power. schafer’s line is a BABIP illusion, belied by weak peripherals and little history of success beyond last year. anderson looks close to done. francoeur looks unlikely to rebound. the only thing is that if atlanta can stay in the race, trading for an outfielder isn’t all that impossible since they have a few positions where an upgrade can be made. teams with position flexibility or back of the rotation gaps can be upgraded at the trade deadline much more easily than teams which have very specific holes for which no one might be available.
Well said.
I agree with you 100% on Francoeur, Chipper, McCann, Escobar, and Johnson.
I can’t argue with you about the power potential of the outfield either. I was pulling for Adam Dunn or Pat Burrell all offeason, but Wren made it apparent that he wanted a good defensive LF and was willing to sacrifice offense for it. I question his signing of Anderson, as I don’t buy his defense as being anything but average at best…his posted a 18.1 UZR/150 last season out of nowhere after three straight seasons in the red.
Schafer’s BABIP in 2007 was insane, I’ll give you that, but I don’t think it’s out of the realm of possibility for him to sustain a BABIP in the neighborhood of ~.335 with the speed he has…maybe higher, but I’m sure you’ll see that as homerism. I’m eager to here you explain a little more on what exactly it is you don’t like about his peripherals. He strikes out too much for my taste, but what young kid doesn’t? He posted a 14.2 BB% last season in AA, and yes I know he isn’t in AA any longer, but that number bodes extremely well for his future plate discipline (which he has displayed already in several PAs…not the Lidge one though, good lord was he torn apart there). Along with that he had an ISO of .202 last season. The fact that his history of success in the minors is minimal (if you throw out the supposed HGH infused season) plays a factor, but there have been plenty of talented players to succeed in the majors after short stays in the minors.
And you’re right about upgrading our OF via trade if the situation arises…we have some decent pitching depth in AAA this season, and frankly I’m surprised that a trade wasn’t already made.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 8, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions
"a lot of weak bats"
First, I’ll cop to not knowing the “third in runs after the break in 2008” stat, and grant that it’s a perfectly valid point to bring up.
But I still think it’s more likely that the Braves will finish with around the 753 runs they scored last season than the 799 Sheehan forecast for them. To explain myself a little more, here’s a quick and dirty take. Of their eight starters, I see:
—two excellent hitters, Jones and McCann, who are likely to get about 75-80 percent of the at-bats at their positions (because Jones always misses time and McCann is a catcher)
—two above-average hitters, Escobar and Johnson, who are likely to get upwards of 90 percent of the ABs at their positions
—four average to below-average hitters, the three OFs and Kotchman, whom I’m guessing will consume 80 percent or so of the ABs at those positions (combining Anderson and Diaz as “one guy” might boost them closer to Escobar/Johnson; I really wanted the Phils to go after Diaz as a platoon partner for Jenkins or Stairs rather than overspend on Ibanez).
We’ll assume that the balance of the ABs from those positions will be about replacement level. Prado can’t hit, but Dave Ross has a solid bat for a backup C, Norton and Infante have their uses, etc.
For them to come close to 800 runs will require the four above-average to excellent bats to meet or exceed what’s expected of them in terms of performance and playing time, and for probably two of the other four to step up (or, maybe more realistic, be replaced from outside). I like Schaefer long-term but expecting more than something like .270/.330/.420 out of him (itself a much higher projection than BP offers) in 2009 is unrealistic. I really don’t like Kotchman’s bat, though maybe I’m too pessimistic given that he’s 26 and has shown some idea of the strike zone. Francoeur and Anderson were discussed above.
The first series suggested that the Braves will go as far as their pitching takes them. Aside from the late bullpen meltdown (by the middle relievers, the least reliable guys) yesterday, were I a Braves fan I’d feel pretty comfortable with that. They might not need to score 800 runs to get back to the playoffs.
J.S.
Jordan Schafer is kind of an x-factor here, and the point made upthread about the Braves having the ability to upgrade their outfield through trade is a perfectly valid one, too. The Braves are dangerous, there’s no doubt.
http://www.thegoodphight.com
I appreciate you taking the time to clarifying your position.
You can't sit on a lead and run a few plays into the line and just kill the clock. You've got to throw the ball over the goddamn plate and give the other man his chance. That's why baseball is the greatest game of them all.
by Smoltz's Beard on Apr 11, 2009 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions

by 























