Manager's Decision
I can’t imagine that Charlie Manuel is having as good a time as one really should with a decent-sized first-place lead in the season after winning a world championship that cemented the love and devotion of an entire city. Of course, the problem with storybook endings in real life is that, unless and until Darren Daulton is proven right, life just keeps on keeping on and new problems pop up. Manuel, just when he should be enjoying unprecedented approbation from his peers and public to go along with higher pay, greater job security and the pleasures of dropping fifty pounds or so, has faced a bunch in 2009.
Manuel’s challenges should make any fan who sits back in his man-cave, bellowing at the TV or computer monitor that he knows better than a World Series-winning manager, sit up and shut up. Manuel is finding in his high-profile job what we all find in lives mostly lived out of the public eye: there are no unambiguous "right" answers, and what works perfectly in one instance might fail miserably in another. Consider the cases of Jimmy Rollins, Cole Hamels, Jamie Moyer and Brad Lidge, all vital cogs in the 2008 world championship who have faced serious struggles, and presented their skipper with serious headaches, in 2009.
1. Jimmy Rollins: The 2007 National League MVP actually was an issue at times last season as well, getting benched twice over the course of the year and stirring up controversy with an ill-chosen statement on a cable TV sports show. As of August 24, 2008, his season averages stood at .255/.321/.411. But Rollins stood tall down the stretch, putting up a .352/.439/.528 batting line over his last 31 regular season games last year. That experience probably made it easier for Manuel to handle Rollins through a truly horrific first three months of 2009, when he batted .205/.250/.319 through July 1.
In that stretch, Manuel first briefly moved Rollins out of the leadoff spot—to the player’s chagrin—then benched him for four games toward the end of June. Since July 2, Rollins has hit .310/.364/.579, and the team has gone 27-13 to take control in the NL East. Rollins’ 9 home runs and 30 RBI over the last six weeks and change still suggest that he might be better deployed lower in the lineup—but Manuel seems to believe that his production is maximized leading off, and right now it’s hard to argue with the results. In any event, Rollins quickly went from among the team’s biggest concerns to one of the biggest factors in its success.
2. Cole Hamels: It’s well known that Manuel, a former batting coach and lifelong student of hitting, takes a more hands-off approach toward his pitchers compared to the guys who are paid to swing the bats. So maybe this is on Rich Dubee as much as the skipper. But Hamels’ struggles to find consistency, much less recapture the utter dominance he showed last October as the team stormed to the title, have cast a shadow over this entire season: his occasional losses of composure have come as a shock to anyone who recalls his unflappability in October, and his difficulties going deep into games have taxed the bullpen.
Lost in both the euphoria over Hamels’ ’08 postseason heroics and the concern over his ongoing lambada with the Verducci Effect has been that at age 25, he’s still something of a work in progress—and both the 2008 workload and the disruptions to his off-season routine that resulted from his new celebrity have steepened that ongoing learning curve. Accordingly, Manuel reiterated his confidence in Hamels while also lobbying, quietly but insistently, for another big arm to stabilize the rotation and, presumably, take some of the spotlight off the reigning World Series MVP. Enter Cliff Lee, whose acquisition nicely fits both purposes. Now if Dubee can just get Cole to use the changeup more…
3. Jamie Moyer: This has to be the one that really churns Manuel’s much-reduced gut. It’s clear that he reveres Moyer, and he’s said that taking the venerable lefty out of the rotation might have been the toughest decision he's had to make. But what choice did he have? In any performance business, when respect and results are in conflict, results must prevail. Putting J.A. Happ in the bullpen, after the boost Happ gave to the entire rotation over the previous three months, would have been the sort of dumb, loyalty-over-winning idea that only the most boneheaded ESPN commentator could love. Hamels, Lee and Joe Blanton weren’t going anywhere. The only other possibility would have been to use Pedro Martinez in relief—but if demoting Moyer to the bullpen ran some risk of sullying the Phillies’ reputation in the clubhouse and around the game, pulling the rug out from under Martinez before he’d even thrown a pitch for the major-league club might have done much more harm.
Interestingly, Moyer’s bitter remarks on the subject last week in Chicago targeted GM Ruben Amaro Jr. and even managing partner David Montgomery—but not Charlie Manuel. Treading lightly between a player he deeply respects and the guys who sign his paychecks--and with whose views on the matter we can guess he agreed—Manuel seems to have both put his team in the best position to win every fifth day, and done as much as he can to ensure that if Moyer is needed again, either back in the rotation or in a relief role, he’ll keep giving it whatever he has left.
4. Brad Lidge: I’ve left the toughest one, and the one that’s still bedeviling Manuel, for last. Lidge’s epic struggles in 2009 might be the biggest reason why the NL East is still even in doubt: if his ERA were half of the 7.21 Lidge has put up for the season—which would still be nearly twice his 1.95 mark in 2008—the Phils could almost start thinking about who to rest in September and how to set up their playoff rotation. But other than a questionable stint on the disabled list in June, Lidge hasn’t budged from that closer job, a fact that even this past weekend’s misadventures in Atlanta did nothing to change.
Lidge’s situation is more difficult for Manuel than those of Rollins and Moyer, in large part because there was no viable replacement for Rollins (Shane Victorino could hit leadoff, but as frustrated as fans were with Jimmy, nobody—NOBODY—wanted to see Eric Bruntlett and his wondrous .400 OPS at shortstop every day) and there was an obvious replacement for Moyer, in the person of Pedro. Perhaps Ryan Madson could fill in for Lidge, though his stint closing while Lidge was on the DL was really no improvement. Chan Ho Park? Maybe, but there’s no guarantee with Park either, and like Madson he’s doing a great job in his current role; at best, you close one hole to open another. If he can steer clear of Escalade doors and/or errant throws from toddlers, Brett Myers might be an option if and when he’s healthy, though it’s far from clear what the erstwhile Opening Day starter and 2007 closer will be able to contribute. Martinez could be another possibility, as he seems likely bound for the bullpen if the Phils make it into the postseason.
But none of those pitchers are likely to approach what Lidge has proven he’s capable of—through almost all of 2008, and even in spots through this lost year of 2009. If Manuel, the training staff, and Lidge himself are to be believed, the reliever is physically healthy. He’s had some bad luck, as seen by his still-high strikeout rate and an opponents’ batting average more than 100 points higher than in 2008 and 82 points above his career mark—though an inability to consistently locate his fastball and get ahead of hitters factors into that higher average allowed, and his 2009 splits have been remarkable in their consistent awfulness. It seems clear to me his confidence is shot right now, and really how could it not be? But then the question becomes how you get it back—and whether that’s best done by a temporary demotion in role or, as Manuel has continued to do, a full-throated defense of Lidge remaining as the closer. The same respect/results conundrum that colored the Moyer decision plays here as well—with the added factor that getting Lidge back to a semblance of his 2008 form is far more important to the Phillies’ title defense chances than doing the same with Moyer.
These four players haven’t presented Manuel’s only challenges this season, of course. He’s also had to deal with the emotions of Park and Happ as they’ve shuffled out of and into the rotation; filling the hole in the rotation created by the Myers injury; weathering the injury to first-half MVP Raul Ibanez and the aging outfielder’s subsequent performance falloff; a rash of bullpen injuries; and probably a dozen other things about which we have no idea. That the team sits more or less comfortably in first place anyway is a tribute to the job Amaro and the front office have done, what the players themselves have accomplished—with particular tips of the cap to the consistent excellence of Victorino, Chase Utley, Blanton and Happ—and Manuel himself. But never think that it’s easy, or that even the wisest decision is guaranteed of success. The game just doesn't work that way.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is really an excellent post. Charlie’s had some really hard issues to manage, and he’s handled them remarkably well. I agree that the toughest problem is Lidge. I literally cringe when he’s handed the ball. And I tend to agree with Whole and the other posters who think he’s really injured in some respect.
Last night the ESPN announcers opined that Charlie’s decision to give the ball to Eyre in the 9th (and the opportunity to close the game out) might really stir up a hornets nest in the media. But that doesn’t seem to have been the reaction. I think everyone knows Lidge is struggling and no one is going to blame Charlie for exploring other option at the closer role. But I have faith Charlie will do the right thing. Again, great post.
thanks
I wrote most of this yesterday and figured I’d hold it till the off-day (though I should have been mindful that my colleagues would have the same idea ;) ), so I didn’t include anything about how Manuel handled Lidge last night.
But in general, I liked how he did it: he put his guy in a good position to succeed, with the least risk of disaster. Using Eyre to start the 9th against two lefties whom I believe (without looking it up) have big splits was smart. Letting him go after Norton, he of the .138 average, was fine too, though I might have switched Lidge in right there.
The interesting question—though I’m glad we didn’t see it!—would have been if Infante had reached base, bringing up Anderson as the tying run with Jones on deck. A Lidge meltdown there might have sealed his fate as far as losing the job. But nobody was up behind Lidge (Park evidently was unavailable with elbow tendonitis)—which itself was something of a vote of confidence.
Manuel seems determined to do everything he can to “recover” Lidge. So long as the lead stays comfortable (>3 games, say), that’s probably the smart way to go.
Unbeknownst Injuries
Interesting speculation about injury…I have noticed in the past several significant times players seem to be performing poorly, then find out later that they were playing with an injury. Tom Gordon last year; Mike Zagursky the year before, were 2 relievers I cringed to see come in…then they were gone for a year or more with elbow injuries that were surely not instantaneous. Pedro Feliz and Chase Utley have much better averages now than towards the end of last year (if memory serves)…[both needed offseason surgery].
+1
I manage 15 people, and part of my fascination with baseball or sports is in personnel moves, how you fit performers into roles, etc. As I grow in my role, looking at managers interests me way more than 20 years ago There is something about Charlie Manuel that really fascinates me—clearly he comes off all country foppish but there is definitely a light on. He can surely motivate, and partly it is in making people believe in their roles, that they can do it, and backing away and letting them perform. When they don’t, it’s not for want of trying. (Interesting that Moyer called out Amaro in his spleen venting and not Charlie.) In this respect, he moves deliberately, maybe too slowly for many, but I think he gets what I’ve come to learn as a truism: you cut with a scalpel, not an axe.
Because sports and the Internet skews toward the young and male, a lot of the abuse he takes comes from a well of impatience. But if you changed people’s roles as often as dyspeptic TGP/WIP posters/callers/hosts wanted, chaos truly would reign.
He’s got obvious strengths and a legacy of real good hitters he developed/is developing. You need some self awareness where you’re out of your depth — pitching coach comes to mind — in how you construct coaches. I don’t know that he’s ever been at home coaching pitchers. But note how baserunning and defense is really no longer an issue with this team. Not so much the case prior to his arrival!
by Wet Luzinski on Aug 17, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Darren Daulton hit in the head?
Did Darren Daulton suffer multiple concussions from beanballs or getting hit in the head?
the repeated bouts of alcohol poisoning probably did him no favors. If he decides to live long enough, and/or we all make it to 2013, I believe we’ve seen his future.

by Wet Luzinski on Aug 17, 2009 11:32 PM EDT up reply actions
excellent
It’s very easy for us, as fans, to demand wholesale personnel changes, trading guys, releasing players, however, since our only emotional connection to the game is via wins and losses. It’s got to be more difficult by many, many levels of magnitude when the player in question is someone you like and respect.
http://www.thegoodphight.com
Or even someone you don’t like but have to see every day, and whom others in the clubhouse might like and respect.
It’s a bit of a fine line, because if you go too far down that path of deference you wind up with Rick Sutcliffe, suggesting that Jamie Moyer should have unlimited rope to screw up and J.A. Happ should come back when he’s in his mid-30s, at which point he can screw over some other kid (and the rest of the team). But it isn’t fantasy baseball that Manuel is playing.
As a side point, I wonder if the prevalence of fantasy ball has made fans generally less patient with and mindful of considerations that don’t show up in the stats or standings. Stands to reason that it would.
Re: the side point
As a long-time fan and someone who used to think about baseball in the winter in the old Hot-stove league, I think you’re right to note that today’s fans seem generally less patient with how a player performs. We used to dream of the great trade that would bring a Reggie Jackson or a Tom Seaver to the Phillies, but once the season started there was relatively little discussion of changes on the team, except for the rare mid-season trade and the occasional prospect brought up from the minors. If a player was doing badly, most of the dissatisfaction would come from those who though a better player was sitting on the bench. And if your team sucked, like the Phillies did for so many years, then that just meant you had to be even more patient, because the alternative could drive you crazy.
by phillyinportland on Aug 19, 2009 3:04 AM EDT up reply actions

by 
























