To Arms! Why Phillies Pitching Should Surge in 2010
Watching the Phillies "30 Teams in 30 Days" segment on MLB Network the other night, I was struck by how much better the team's 2009 pitching numbers were after the All-Star break. The team's ERA dropped dramatically between July and the end of the season, Phils hurlers allowed home runs at a sharply lower rate, and--most significantly in my opinion--the starters in particular worked more innings.
The reasons for this aren't a mystery: between May and August, struggling starters Chan Ho Park, Brett Myers, and Jamie Moyer gave way to J.A. Happ, Cliff Lee and Pedro Martinez, with Antonio Bastardo and Rodrigo Lopez taking interim turns in the rotation before Lee and Pedro showed up. The two former Cy Young award winners were magnificent for the Phillies, and all Happ did was finish second in Rookie of the Year balloting. Meanwhile, Joe Blanton rebounded from a shaky start to the '09 season, and Cole Hamels was sharply better after a terrible April.
I've written here before that rotation stability--or, to put it another way, starter quantity almost independent of quality--seems to be the key for overall Phillies pitching performance. With a 2010 rotation that's considerably more settled than its immediate predecessor, the stage could be set for the team's best mound performance in a long time.
Overall, the team put up middling pitching numbers in 2009, with a 4.16 team ERA (6th in the National League) despite a .265 batting average against (12th), .757 opponents OPS (11th) and 189 home runs allowed (13th). There wasn't much quality differentiation between rotation and bullpen: the starters put up a collective 4.29 ERA, 7th in the league, while the relievers' 3.91 mark was 9th. Phillies starters threw 963.2 innings, 6th in the Senior Circuit; that looks a lot better when you consider that through the first month or so, the starters barely topped an average of 5 innings per game. That put a lot of strain on the bullpen, which itself wasn't at full strength with Brad Lidge embarked upon his nightmare 2009 and J.C. Romero still suspended.
Nothing is foreordained, of course, but there's reason to think that 2010 could see a return to the successful dynamic of 2008, when starting pitcher quantity--Phils starters worked the fourth-most innings in the NL--contributed to reliever quality (a league-best 3.22 bullpen ERA). Rebounds from Lidge and Romero will be crucial here, but even if they don't totally return to form, a collective 800 innings from the first four men in the rotation will go a long way toward limiting the damage they might do.
Is that feasible? I think so. As you might have heard, this Roy Halladay guy we have now is both pretty good and quite durable: in the last four seasons, he's worked 220, 225.1, 246 and 239 innings and thrown 29 complete games. Assuming good health--an across the board caveat here, of course--those inning numbers shouldn't go down now that he'll see opposing pitchers rather than designated hitters three or so times each start. Consensus projections have Halladay throwing around 210-220 innings this season, which might represent slight error on the conservative side--though maybe they're figuring Charlie Manuel will want to keep Doc relatively fresh for additional work in October.
Then there's Number Two starter Hamels. It's a bit startling that only three years ago we were all concerned about the lefty's durability, but he's shaken the "fragile" label that followed him through the minors with over 600 regular season innings the last three years, plus another 60 or so in the playoffs. About 200 frames in his age-26 season sounds about right to me, and I think they'll be of sharply higher quality than his overall 2009 work.
Third starter Joe Blanton came to the Phils during the 2008 season with a reputation as an innings-eater--a descriptor that nicely fit with the innumerable fat jokes made at Blanton's expense. But some minor health concerns limited his durability down the stretch in '08, and he didn't quite crack 200 innings in a generally strong '09 season. Still, 190-plus innings at slightly above league average from your #3, in front of a great lineup and strong defense, is just fine, thanks. Having shed a few pounds this offseason, it's not unrealistic to imagine Kentucky Joe taking both a quantitative and qualitative step forward--Bill James, who seems uniformly bullish on the Phils, is a believer--but even more of same is just fine.
J.A. Happ, in camp with a guaranteed rotation spot for the first time in his short career, doesn't have the workhorse track record of his three rotation mates. But the lefty's large frame, relatively clean injury history as a professional and intelligence all suggest that it's no stretch to pencil him in for 180 innings or so. There's also no particular need for Charlie Manuel and Rich Dubee to monitor Happ's innings workload: at age 27, he's more or less out of the "injury nexus."
In total, Phillies pitchers threw 1455.2 innings last year. Their four heaviest-workload starters were Blanton (195.1 IP), Hamels (193.2), Happ (144.1), and Jamie Moyer (143.1), for a total of 676.2 innings at a combined 4.18 ERA. Lee, Brett Myers, Martinez, Park, Lopez, Bastardo, Kyle Kendrick and Andrew Carpenter combined to throw another 287 innings, of wildly varying quality. If Halladay, Hamels, Blanton, and Happ can approach a combined 800 innings at around a collective 3.80 ERA, that buys a lot of certainty even with the questions around Moyer and Kendrick in the fifth starter slot, the comeback efforts for Lidge and Romero, and uncertainty elsewhere in the bullpen.
0 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
I love approaches like this because they portray the season for what it is — not the hackneyed “marathon” metaphor, but from the standpoint that the season is a finite resource of innings and outs. Who pitches them, at what quality, and who gets outs. It’s Weaveresque.
Straight up, there are 162 games x 27 outs=4374 outs, or 1458 innings (excluding extra inning games and games we’re losing on the road, the 2009 totals are almost exactly on this number). Moyer and Park combined for 220 innings; Martinez added 45.
1458-800 innings leaves 658 innings from everyone else. The guys who throw between 50-80 innings are marginal but important – Contreras, Baez, Madson, Lidge, Romero, Durbin. If you assume 160 from starter #5 + 3 of the above pitching about 80 innings decently, then we’re left with 258 innings to pitch. That’s merely 9.5 games for the Zagurskis, Tyler Walkers, Antonio Bastardo types to pitch.
The big assumption here is health, clearly, but with this offense, even an injury to a starter (or, God forbid, two) could be weathered by slugging it out – a luxury that our divisional rivals don’t quite have to the same degree. Each healthy pitcher throwing many innings of sub-5.00 ERA ball (given that the Phils have averaged 5.16 runs per game over the past 6 seasons) is an absolute bonus and will keep us not only competitive, but is another nail in the coffins of our competition.
bingo
To put it slightly differently, the Phils now seem to have more roads to success than was the case in, say, 2007, when they basically had to beat the other team into submission and constantly adjust the pitching personnel in a seemingly endless search for guys who could get to 27 outs. In ’08 they started to win games with pitching when the offense went into relative slumber mode in the second half: Hamels, post-exile Myers and Moyer were a very good front three, and Madson/Romero/Lidge were untouchable down the stretch and in October.
Last year was the weird one: almost all the pitching standouts from ‘08 were ineffective, hurt or both, but they got back to the Series anyway because Lee, Pedro, Happ and Park stepped up. That’s probably 75 percent to the credit of Amaro, Manuel and Dubee, and 25 percent luck—there was no guarantee that Pedro would be as durable or good as he was, not to mention the rookie Happ and the heretofore unreliable Chopper.
The acquisitions of Lee and Pedro were the fourth straight year the team had added a key starter in-season (Moyer ‘06, Lohse ’07, Blanton ’08); those moves have worked and to this point we haven’t lost anyone we really miss, but that’s a dangerous way to live. What’s exciting to me about 2010 is that we’re on solid ground in hoping for stability and performance from the front of the rotation—and a good thing too, because we don’t have that much left to trade (and might yet need to go get a closer if Lidge doesn’t bounce back).
On Closing Related Matters
Baez can close, or at least he should be able too.
"I remember being three and I wanted to be a baseball player, that's all I ever really wanted to be. That and Spider Man." -Raul Ibanez
by Jose and the Contrarians on Mar 7, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions
And I’m sure he’d get first shot, and/or Madson. But if neither of them runs with it, and/or someone with a better track record comes available to fill what looks like the team’s only/most glaring vulnerability, I can’t imagine Amaro wouldn’t make a run at that guy.
Of course, we’re getting waaaay ahead of ourselves here…
I also learned from listening to this that the phillies live and die by the home run and strike out a lot.
I believe Peter Gammons switch to MLB was a philosophy change…sure ESPN is behind the curve, but MLB network probably doesn’t even know who Bill James is
by jemagee on Mar 7, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions
It’s too early to be enthused, but I am pleasantly optimistic and hopeful that he can have a productive season as #5.
What happens if he and Moyer both pitch well for the whole month?
I think the ideal solution would be to trade Chad Durbin to some other team for peanuts and make Kendrick the long man/no. 6 starter. This assumes that Bastardo pitches well enough to make the team out of spring training and that Lidge and Romero are healthy enough to start the year on the roster.
What happens if he and Moyer both pitch well for the whole month?
Sounds like Park v. Happ 2009.
http://www.thegoodphight.com
That would certainly be a good problem to have. The other option being to send Kendrick to Lehigh Valley to start the season and bring him up when Moyer falters or a starter/reliever suffers an injury. I don’t think you’d get anything for Durbin at this point, anyway (though Wade loves him some former Phillies) so keep him around as an arm, knowing Kendrick is available.
Zolecki reported today that Romero is unlikely to be ready by Opening Day after all, so this could all be moot.
I agree that we wouldn’t get much of a return for Durbin as far as players go. But the other team taking $2 million off our hands and opening up a roster spot for us would be enough of a return for me.
On the other hand, it might be a good idea to keep Kendrick in the minors for a little while. If my calculations are correct, he has about 1 year + 142 days of service time right now. So sending him to AAA for even a couple of weeks could delay his arbitration eligibility for another year.
You forgot something:
“So sending him to AAA for even a couple of weeks could delay his arbitration eligibility for another year,” cackled Amaro, evilly. “MUAHAHAHAHAHA!”
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Mar 10, 2010 7:17 AM EST up reply actions
“By this time tomorrow, Elliot Ness will be designated for assignment!” ::gales of manly Al Capone-led laughter::
by Wet Luzinski on Mar 10, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
Contreras, meanwhile, has been atrocious today. Falling behind every hitter and leaving some meatballs up in the zone.
Satchel Moyer is going to pitch till he’s 147. So there.
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Mar 10, 2010 7:18 AM EST up reply actions
I nominate this post for “most likely to jinx the Phillies in 2010”. This, even though I do not believe in jinxes. Cognitive dissonance, thy name is R.T.P.
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Mar 10, 2010 7:22 AM EST reply actions
I agree that the optimism is a bit creepy and out of sorts for this team. This gives me an idea for my inaugural associate-level post where we’ll get all the nattering nabobism out on the table.
by Wet Luzinski on Mar 10, 2010 5:31 PM EST up reply actions
I think what’s needed is an adjustment to how people see ‘this’ team – 3 straight division wins, 2 straight world series appearances…they ARE the team to beat in the NL and have been for more than 12 months…they’re a better run organization than they used to be, so maybe what’s needed is an adjustment to the fans viw of the team in general
by jemagee on Mar 10, 2010 11:42 PM EST up reply actions

by 
























