The Cure: Phillies 2, Braves 0
Through the three-game losing streak they took into tonight's game against the Braves, starting pitching was the least of the Phillies' problems. Jamie Moyer was great after a disastrous first inning in Saturday's 5-1 loss to the Marlins; Cole Hamels dominated in a losing effort on Sunday, working into the 9th inning of a 2-0 loss to Florida; Kyle Kendrick, of all people, fired eight shutout innings at Atlanta Tuesday night before the bullpen caved in and the Braves rallied to apply a late taint kick. The common thread was a near-total lack of hitting, as the Phillies managed just four runs in the three defeats.
The lineup was limp again Wednesday night, managing just two runs and seven hits against Tim Hudson and two relievers despite Hudson's wildness through six innings. It didn't matter. Roy Halladay threw his second complete game in four starts and first shutout as a Phillie, helped by consistently excellent defense behind him as the Phils turned aside Atlanta 2-0. Halladay retired the first 11 Braves hitters, escaped a bases-loaded, one-out jam in the seventh and got Chipper Jones, Brian McCann and Troy Glaus--to ground out in the 9th, the last three of his 14 groundouts on the evening. Halladay allowed five hits and two walks, and struck out seven.
The Phils had a chance to take a big early lead, as Jayson Werth and Raul Ibanez hit back to back doubles to start the top of the second. Juan Castro followed Ibanez with a single, putting men on the corners with none out, but Hudson retired the next three hitters to keep it 1-0. That was it for scoring until the 6th, when Ryan Howard led off with a check-swing single through the vacated left side of the infield and Werth followed with his second double of the night, scoring the big man from first. He went to third on the throw to the plate, but was cut down at home when Castro grounded into a fielder's choice.
Atlanta's best chance came in the bottom of the 7th, when Jones and McCann singled on Halladay's first two pitches of the evening inning. Glaus--whom Shane Victorino had reached over the wall to rob of a home run in the second inning--struck out, but miracle-performing rookie Jason Heyward drew a walk to load the bases. Yunel Escobar worked the count to 2-2, then connected for what looked like a two-run single--until Utley laid out for it and flipped to Castro, who deftly turned the double play to end the inning.
Halladay improved to 4-0, winning his fourth straight start to open a season for the first time in his career and lowering his ERA from a superb 1.13 ERA to an unfathomable 0.82. One point of hopefully minor concern: third baseman Placido Polanco was hit on the elbow by a pitch in the top of the first and left the game a few innings later with a contusion. Early reports are that he'll be out tomorrow, but back by the weekend.
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Would be great if with right hat.
I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.
by Christopher A on Apr 21, 2010 11:23 PM EDT up reply actions
agree. This was part of the reason why as a kid, I adopted them as my AL team. Even got to a game at the old Exhibition Stadium, which was kind of a laugh.
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 22, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions
original unis were a victim of the 1970s, but with some creative updating (button front, getting rid of white field on cap, etc.) they might have kept the same logo.
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 23, 2010 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Quit whining
Ask a Mets fan what injuries are like.
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Apr 22, 2010 6:34 AM EDT up reply actions
um, im pretty sure whining is in order at this point. 3 position players, 2 starting pitchers and a castro in a starting lineup
not to sound
dumb or anything, but who is the 3rd position player, i only count two, if polanco is out for any time at all.
by PhilsForever on Apr 22, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Though you could argue that since moyer probably isn’t 100% it is 3 starting pitchers
by jemagee on Apr 22, 2010 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeha, but the mets deserve all their misfortune
by jemagee on Apr 22, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
And then some, especially since Francoeur was essentially asking for the Phils to experience injury with his “they’ve been so lucky—look at what we went through” crap. (although he did throw in the disclaimer that he wasn’t wishing injury on the Phils, but you know that passive agressive BS when you see it)
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko
Lee thru 4 games last yr: 4-0, 33 IP, 0.82 ERA, 33 K, 2 CG.
Halladay thru 4 games this yr: 4-0, 33 IP, 0.82 ERA, 28 K, 2 CG.
Does this mean that we have 1 more great start and then the wheels fall off until the post season?
Blasphemy!!
Look Doc is unlikely to go 35-0, but there is not a chance that the “wheels will fall off”.
I saw that his BABIP is a lot closer to sustainable thru four starts than was Lee’s: something like .281 to .231. So that bodes well… even if there’s no way he stays this good.
Um. That didn’t happen. He had a few rough starts. But the wheels didn’t fall off. There were several serviceable to excellent starts mixed in there.
by FuquaManuel on Apr 22, 2010 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Rocket Pops for the Phillies
Impressed with the glove work esp. Victorino’s catch and the big man’s stretch, the ‘’Lunger" on the mound and the big boy pants ABs many of the guy’s took. Nice too see Ibanez get something. The only thing missing would be Chipper and Cox spontaneously combusting…I won’t be greedy. Just Chipper
Trading for the halladay guy was a decent move…
"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel
by foos05 on Apr 22, 2010 5:13 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Time will tell. The Phillies are reaping dividends right now, certainly.
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Apr 22, 2010 6:36 AM EDT up reply actions
I disagree with people on this notion all the time. As I remember we all beat this discussion to a pulp over the offseason, but who cares?
We made a trade based on a certain amount of information. Evaluating the quality of a trade based on whether the star we got performs well/performs poorly/gets injured or whether the prospects we sent away turn into all stars/serviceable major leaguers/busts is just a fallacious way to look at it.
Hypothetically speaking, let’s say Roy Halladay needs TJ surgery by the end of the year, Kyle Drabek has a career like his dad did and Travis D’Arnaud is the franchise catcher for the Blue Jays for the next 10 years. We have the right to feel frustrated, but what were the chances of this happening? We trade potentialities, and all we have to go on are statistics and scouting reports. Future performances are not inevitabilities, they’re results of probabilistic outcomes. And this is what we traded. Odds are in favor Roy Halladay will be an excellent, healthy pitcher for us for several years. Odds are against any of the prospects we traded away (or any minor league prospect at all, for that matter) becoming all stars.
Bear in mind, none of this is supporting or bashing the trade, I’m just pointing out that time will not tell – that trade happened as a moment in time, and everything that happens afterward deals with so many more variables it would make your head spin to consider them.
Yeah but most fans will only look at what halladay does to determine if it’s win or lose – not seeing the bigger picture
by jemagee on Apr 22, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions
No
“We” did not make a trade. We are attempting to evaluate a trade based on a certain amount of information. However, while we don’t know what information Rube and the gang had available when they made the trade, I can guarantee it was more than we were privy to.
Therefore it is reasonable to evaluate trades IN PART upon the actual performance of the players dealt/acquired. If a GM consistently trades for players that exceed expectations and/or trades away players who don’t meet them, shouldn’t the GM be credited for this?
Absolutely. I intended to include that point as part of my comment, but now see I neglected to mention it. When looking at group of transactions executed by a given managerial/scouting staff, I think it becomes reasonable to look at the success/failure of those players and evaluate the scouting or forecasting ability of those staffs. I would still maintain that it’s rarely fair to judge them based on the eventual outcomes of one particular transaction, though (notable gross oversights excepted).
“Atlanta’s best chance came in the bottom of the 7th, when Jones and McCann singled on Halladay’s first two pitches of the evening.”
“inning”, perhaps?
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Apr 22, 2010 6:36 AM EDT reply actions
Hey happens to everyone, even with editors. In todays phillyburbs.com article the second best sixers beat writer made a rather interesting error that actually gave the sixers coach credit for doing exactly the opposite of what he really did
by jemagee on Apr 22, 2010 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
The subtitle of this recap should definitely be:
Just Like Heaven
Roy’s Don’t Cry
or
[Wednesday] I’m in Love
In honor of 201 and the revelation of cartmans father it should have been “Disintegration is the best album ever”
by jemagee on Apr 22, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions

by 


























