Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Why We're Skeptical Of LeBron James

Phillies, Ryan Howard ink five-year extension through 2016

PHOENIX - APRIL 25:  Ryan Howard #6 of the Philadelphia Phillies warms up on deck during the Major League Baseball game against the Arizona Diamondbacks at Chase Field on April 25, 2010 in Phoenix, Arizona. The Diamondbacks defeated the Phillies 8-6.  (Photo by Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

Jim Salisbury of CSNPhilly.com reports that the Philadelphia Phillies are about to extend first baseman and 2006 National League Most Valuable Player Ryan Howard through the 2016 season, with a deal reported to be worth $125 million.

Even though Howard has lost a ton of weight and is looking much better in the field, committing that much money to a large-bodied first baseman seems like a risky proposition.

Edit: done, per Murphy. Five years, $125 million, with an option year that would raise it to six years, $138 million. I hope he remembers how to draw walks.

Edit #2: the excellent Cot's Baseball Contracts has the financial breakdown.

12: $20M, 13: $20M, 14: $25M, 15: $25M, 16:$25M, 17:$23M club option ($10M buyout)

More in-depth analysis will follow -- both here, and elsewhere around the interwebs -- but I'll leave you with this nugget for now: only once in Howard's career, according to Fangraphs' WAR metric, has he been worth more than the $25 million AAV (average annual value) that this deal will pay him: his MVP season back in 2006.

Comment 121 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

That’s a lot of Subway sandwiches.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Apr 26, 2010 2:28 PM EDT reply actions  

those Big Philly Cheesesteaks are expensive

To me the Eagles are like that girlfriend that pisses u off, then u hate her, but the next morning you wake up and remember that thing u love so much about her

by XxBleedGreen5xX on Apr 26, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jayson Werth

Just got on the phone with his good friend Reggie Jackson….

by David S. Cohen on Apr 26, 2010 2:29 PM EDT reply actions  

That was my first thought, too. He has to see the writing on the wall at this point.

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Apr 26, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess I might as well pimp my analysis of this from last month while the iron is hot.

http://www.thegoodphight.com/2010/3/18/1379681/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

which was a great post and equally great comment thread.

My first reaction is that it will just suck to watch Werth play for the Yankees. I don’t want to hate him for that, but we’re both big boys and will get over it. Plus, I have some real qualms about Howard, mostly because he has been so bad the last two weeks at the plate, and this is coming right before the Phillies play arguably the best pitching staff in the league (I know, this is a distorted view compared to 5 years worth of early-to-mid 30s value). I just wish I had more reassurance that he can lay off lefty breaking balls and improve his walk rate. To his credit, he has worked on every deficiency in his game, but this one might be the toughest.

by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Every monday should have good news like this. Fuck yes.

by Michael Levin on Apr 26, 2010 2:29 PM EDT reply actions  

This is good news huh?

by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

oddly enough, im siding with u on this

TAKE THE FALL, ACT HURT, GET INDIGNANT

by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Apr 26, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is great news. Everyone loves Howard. He’s the man. Werth can be replaced, Dominick Brown is a stud. The trick is finding a replacement for our other corner outfielder.

by orangeandblack20 on Apr 26, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they are hoping Ben comes around. He’s only 26 if I’m right.

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ben is a good player, but you aren’t going to replace Werth’s right Handed power bat with Ben Francisco (or Brown, for that matter). Maybe if Mayberry suddenly blossomed, but there isn’t another Right Handed outfielder with Power potential ready for the big time for another 3 years, at the earliest.

by Cormican on Apr 26, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Boy, I just randomly capitalized all kinds of weird things in that post.

by Cormican on Apr 26, 2010 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was addressing Ben to Ibanez for the time being.

Brown will replace Werth.

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

The lack of Right Handed power concerns me in that scenario some, though I don’t think it’s a doomsday issue. I’d like to have someone from 3-7 in the order who is right handed. I imagine they will have to platoon Francisco or Mayberry with Ibanez next year anyway.

by Cormican on Apr 26, 2010 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

isn’t Brown a righty?

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then yea, big issue :) They might try to ship Ibanez anyways at some point and bring someone new in.

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s an issue, but not that big of an issue. It’s much more important to have the best possible players on the field than it is to have L/R lineup balance.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed, if the biggest issue you have is that you have 100+ HRs coming from the right side of the plate, you’re in pretty good shape. I think if a Pirates fan wandered in and read this thread, they wouldn’t be very sympathetic to our plight.

by Cormican on Apr 26, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed. Also I don’t think Brown has shown significant platoon splits so far.

by ThinMountainAir on Apr 26, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

far too much is usually made of lineup ‘balance’

some types of excellent hitters see very little dropoff in production when facing the same handed pitcher (i.e. chase utley 0.913/0.887 career OPS R/L split)

other types of excellent hitters crush the one type of pitcher while having an issue with the other (i.e. ryan howard 1.063/0.752 career OPS R/L split)

overall, its way more important to have excellent hitters in your lineup, regardless of how they swing their bat

by Steve J on Apr 26, 2010 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Power should always be capitalized!

by Whack8888 on Apr 26, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank God

"Sugah n' rainbows"

"We will steal the show, jolly Rogers go, we are wolves of the sea."

by JpH89 on Apr 26, 2010 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

nooooooooooooooo

TAKE THE FALL, ACT HURT, GET INDIGNANT

by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Apr 26, 2010 2:36 PM EDT reply actions  

The important question is why was it necessary at this time to do such a thing?

by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 2:42 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

I thought it was another belated April fools joke.

by Boundforbeach on Apr 26, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

So he’ll be 36 in the final year of this contract. I suppose it could be worse.

I understand the “big body” concerns, but Howard’s body is somewhat different from Mo Vaughn’s or David Ortiz’s. To me, his body type is about halfway between those guys on one hand and Frank Thomas on the other.

I’m not against choosing Howard over Werth, as I indicated in my earlier post. This deal does seem a bit pricey though. And I would have prioritized extending Rollins first over extending Howard.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 2:44 PM EDT reply actions  

I personally disagree with this move…but oh well.

I think Howard is much more replaceable than Werth, and would rather hand 100 million to a guy who works counts deep and plays his position extremely well.

by Clyde Simmons on Apr 26, 2010 2:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

I also feel Rollins is a priority, as we have no replacement for him in our system. Thoughts?

"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko

by doubleh on Apr 26, 2010 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

H’es much older than howard and wouldn’t be worth what he demands right now…the problem is the phillies have nothing in the minors for short or third – and really ned to

by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, no, this is actually baseless, considering that none of us know what Rollins “demands right now.” He is an extremely valuable player because of his position, and you are probably underrating him badly.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 3:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s 11 months older than Howard, and based on body type probably no worse a bet to stay healthy deep into his 30s. Of course he also has more of an injury history, but it’s not like either of them is Nick Johnson.

by dajafi on Apr 26, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I tend to take into account ‘years’ in the league.

Maybe that’s just an NBA thing – Kevin Garnett is younger than many players – but much closer to the end of his career due to the arly start and long minutes he’s logged – might not apply to baseball.

by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re right, it doesn’t apply to baseball to nearly the same extent. These guys play baseball year round whether they’re amateurs or pro players (be it major league or minor league), so the difference is negligible; it’s really all about age.

Very true about the NBA though, with Garnett obviously being the foremost example. (Kinda sad watching him now, isn’t it? Though maybe that also has something to do with him being a Celtic…)

by PhillyFriar on Apr 26, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve hated garnett for a while now (ever since that smacked the team mate story)

Kobe is older than most would think as well for the same reasons

by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand that, I know that we are stacked in the outfield in the minors. At the same time, it’s not like Ibeanez is going to get extended, and now we are banking alot on Brown being a MLB contributor next year.

I also do not think this was a below market contract. I don’t know if Werth would have taken a below market contract to stay with the team, but I hope they at least put a feeler to Werth before they did this.

by Clyde Simmons on Apr 26, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

It definitely is not sub-market, that’s for sure. I don’t think Werth would have signed for sub-market either, but of course we don’t have proof of that.

We are banking a lot on Brown but I don’t think we have (or ever had) a choice. If Brown turns out to be a bust, we’re screwed no matter what.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Poor kid. That’s a lot of pressure.

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Apr 26, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah. I think there are better-than-pick-em odds that the fans will turn on him someday.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Especially if any of the Drabek/Taylor/d’Arnaud trio pans out. “Why did we keep Brown while Taylor’s hitting .310 for Oakland?!?”

by PhillyFriar on Apr 26, 2010 5:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

No doubt. The transition from “we never should have traded Lee for prospects” to “we never should have traded prospects for Halladay” would be utterly seamless.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

No idea if this is really good or bad. Ryan is getting better all around but Werth is much more needed. 1B is basically a power position all around the MLB now, wouldn’t have been hard to find at least someone who can hit 25-30 HR at a more reasonable price for 5 years.

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 2:47 PM EDT reply actions  

this is more then what Mauer got isnt it?

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

About 2M more per year, but the precedent for Catchers and the precedent for 1B are pretty different.

by Cormican on Apr 26, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mauer also got 8 years.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

but a catcher like Mauer? Guess you need to factor in the discount he did give the Twins.

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

That, plus the fact that Mauer gave them a huge discount. A catcher anywhere near equal to Mauer doesn’t exist (maybe Wieters or Santana will get there, but right now, nothing), so it’s hard to project what he really could have gotten as a Free Agent given his defensive and offensive value.

by Cormican on Apr 26, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

What’s Howard worth this year? Maybe $25 or $30 million? I don’t see him being worth an average of $25 million in his age 32-36 years. I’m not saying its impossible, but it doesn’t seem likely given his body type and the type of player he is.

The timing of this deal also seems sort of funny. Why not wait till next offseason? I don’t think $125 over five years for a player in his 30’s can be seen as a hometown discount or anything. Even if he has an MVP year this year, I can’t see him getting more somewhere else.

by mattjg on Apr 26, 2010 2:51 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t want to sound pollyanna-ish about this deal, because there are good reasons to have reservations. But you should keep in mind that $25 million in 2015 or 2016 dollars is not the same as $25 million in 2010 dollars. You have to build in inflation and economic growth.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, taking those cost-of-living increases into the equation, and Howard is practically volunteering his time.

by Philibuster on Apr 26, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Phillies have a few conspiracy plots to lower the value of the dollar so much that Howard won’t even be able to afford a loaf of bread with his 2016 salary.

by Clyde Simmons on Apr 26, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think I saw that Ruben and Hu Jintao are Facebook friends.

by Steve J on Apr 26, 2010 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

If there is one thing Amaro has been consistent at in his short tenure as GM, it has been tying a lot of money up in players who are or will be on the wrong side of 35 when their deals expire (or begin). I’m very nervous about this deal.

by FuquaManuel on Apr 26, 2010 2:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I count Moyer and Ibanez. Who else?

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Polanco and Halladay will also be past 35 when their deals expire, but I’m not worrying so much about their contracts because I think they were good for the team.

I guess it’s not as bad as a I initially thought, but still that’s 5 multi-year signings of players who are or will be past 35. That has to be a lot, right?

by FuquaManuel on Apr 26, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll bet the Cubs are worse. (Not that that’s a high bar to clear.)

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

maybe the Yankees too.

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

True. But they have no budget, so they can do as they please.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

And that’s the problem – the phillies operate within a budget so if Howard falls off they can’t just pay to replace him

by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yea but Philly loves our Phillies

I cannot see in the immediate to slightly distant future a home game that doesn’t sell out. And another WS title could give us a competitive national fanbase (fans who aren’t from philly and don’t live in philly…aka mechandise.)

"Although I may not agree with what you're saying, I'll fight to the death for your right to say it. Good day, sir." Pete Griffin

by RiotJuice on Apr 26, 2010 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow.

I mean, wow.

As taco pal said above, there’s definitely reason to think that Howard will age better than Mo Vaughn and David Ortiz. The man has gotten himself in great shape, and he’s an offensive force to be reckoned with.

On the other hand… wow. $125 million is a helluva lot to commit to someone’s Age 32-36 seasons, especially when they only have one plus tool and provide no value on the defensive spectrum. I definitely agree with those who said that Rollins should have been extended first.

Honestly, I’m still processing this. “Nervous excitement” is probably the best way to describe my mood right now.

by PhillyFriar on Apr 26, 2010 3:08 PM EDT reply actions  

$115 M or $ 125 M

Am I adding up these numbers wrong?:

20+20+25+25+25 = $ 115 M

Isn’t this deal for $ 115 M/5yr and NOT $ 125/5yr? (with a possible sixth-year option of $ 23 M making it $ 138/6)

Or am I missing something here?

Either way, that’s a lot of cash and I’m not sure yet how I feel about it (especially considering Howard’s 2010 OPS+ of 99).

And yes— this seems like weird timing to me unless Amaro is also talking with Jason Werth on the side (does anyone know?).

by Romero on Apr 26, 2010 3:08 PM EDT reply actions  

The buyout costs 10 mil so its atelast 125 mil.

by orangeandblack20 on Apr 26, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotcha, thanks. I was overlooking that.

by Romero on Apr 26, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

yep, so 125 mil and technically only $13 million for the 6th year

by Ant on Apr 26, 2010 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait and see

It’s a done deal, regardless. Makes me wonder what Pujuls will get.

The team does seem as though it is not going to settle for “small market” status. At some point, a big contract will blow up, and it will be interesting to see how that will affect things going forward, if at all.

I am not upset to see Howard signed – he has been a good citizen; he has produced; he has worked on weaknesses (fielding/weight and conditioning). He has demonstrated through significant actions (training/working out) that he sets and achieves goals.

He may suffer injuries, but the implication that he may eat himself out of the league, a la Ortiz/Vaughn/Fielder seems more unlikely to me each year.

Lots of cash, yes. Lots of risk, yes. Could the money have been spent better? Maybe. Was this abysmally stupid? Absolutely not, imo.

Remember the Phitans

by RememberthePhitans on Apr 26, 2010 4:06 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

At some point, a big contract will blow up

See Eaton, Adam

Not quite the same magnitude as Howard’s new contract, though…

by Cthepitch on Apr 26, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Remember ARod's first contract?

It was for 25 mil a year and people were like WTF, nobody is getting 25 mil a year. I am not so sure they should. Nobody should ever feel bad for Chase, but his 15 mil a year is a pittance now.

What’s funny is I railed on the Rollin’s and Utley contracts. Not cause I didn’t want them here, but because the Phillies gave up so much leverage when they signed them. I have no idea what they think Howard will provide them in 3+ years from now.

For Who? My teammates.

For What? To Win.

How Much? Where do I sign?

by jonk on Apr 26, 2010 4:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t remember how I felt about the Rollins and Utley contracts at the time, but they really turned out to be hugely important to the current success of this team. (And it’s worth noting who negotiated them: Ed Wade.)

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rollins, to a degree, but not Utley’s. Utley would have been here for the last couple of years anyway. My major issue was that we gave him 4 years past his 6 years and got no value for it. Phillies took all the liability.

For Who? My teammates.

For What? To Win.

How Much? Where do I sign?

by jonk on Apr 26, 2010 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t understand. Can you elaborate?

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

“but his 15 mil a year is a pittance now”

Hey, brother, can you spare a pittance?

:)

Remember the Phitans

by RememberthePhitans on Apr 26, 2010 4:15 PM EDT reply actions  

The verdicts from Crashburn Alley and Fangraphs are in.

Here is Bill’s take. The money quote, at least as far as I’m concerned:

Most Phillies fans will love the extension, as it keeps a fan favorite in town for a long time. Stat-savvy fans immediately dislike the deal. Most Phillies fans will come to loathe the deal in several years when the Phillies are hamstrung by Howard’s relatively large salary and declining production.

Matthew Carruth from Fangraphs isn’t even that charitable.

Even if you think baseball’s salary per win goes up to $4.25 million this coming offseason and rises at a 5% clip every winter through 2017, Howard will need to produce an average of 4.75 wins from 2012 through 2017 just in order to justify his salary. If you factor in that Howard gets (even more) long-term security from this deal, then that average production levels goes up to 5.3 wins. In other words, Howard will need six seasons that were better than his 2009 season, except over his 32-37 years.

by PhillyFriar on Apr 26, 2010 4:20 PM EDT reply actions  

ow

My tummy hurts!

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Apr 26, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Zo Zone

generally bullish on the deal but wants to question RAJ on timing. But I thought this was interesting:

I’ve gotten the sense recently that the Phillies think they can sign Jayson Werth to a contract extension. It might be because they realize they have to have at least one right-handed bat in the middle of their lineup. But I don’t think today’s deal means Werth is gone. Now, if Werth wants a five-year, $100 million deal, yeah, the Phillies probably won’t sign him to something like that. But if it’s a fair deal — the Roy Halladay, Chase Utley and Jimmy Rollins contract extensions seemed to work out for both parties — then I see a chance at Werth sticking around. They could use him, too.

-

by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

At this point, wouldn’t that be a disaster? I guess we could try to move Ibanez, and I don’t think it’s impossible to hope that we can do it without eating an inordinate amount of salary (if he plays well this year). But if we can’t, then signing Werth means that we will necessarily allow tons of resources to go to waste in 2011, either by (1) benching a ready-to-play Domonic Brown; (2) eating Raul’s salary by relegating him to part-time duty or bench duty; or (3) eating Raul’s salary in a trade. Any one of those options would leave us worse off than we would be otherwise.

Keeping this entire aging core together with long-term, full-market-price contracts is simply not the right decision. It’s a recipe for a long, slow slide into mediocrity. Even the Yankees suffered a bit when they overdid that in 2008, and the Yankees are way richer than we will ever be.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 9:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I guess we could try to trade Victorino and move Werth to center for one year. I’m sure Victorino will be very tradeable, but still, it’s unwise to depend on either trade materializing.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually, I guess it’s a little more complicated than that. Still, the overall approach is a problem. Ruben needs to be channeling Andy Reid and Joe Banner right now, not Bill Giles circa 1994.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think it’s a disaster, but it does depend on moving Victorino or Ibanez. Or, RAJ is like me, and keeps forgetting he gave Ibanez a 3-year deal.

by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

My only hope

is that people don’t start calling Ryan Howard the next David Ortiz. Their bodies are just way different to warrant a valid comparison of aging. Ortiz is and was much heavier than Howard and do I even need to mention that Ortiz was busted for PED

Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."

by Justin F. on Apr 26, 2010 4:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Bleh

I hit post too soon.

I meant to say “Howard is in better shape than Ortiz” and besides, I am not even a huge fan of this deal. I do worry about 5-6 years from now, I just do not think people (and I am not saying anyone here is, but I have seen it elsewhere and it is irritating me) should compare Howard to Ortiz.

Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."

by Justin F. on Apr 26, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Suck it Cardinals...

See how cheap this was? And he probably would have taken even less to go back to St. Louis. You stupid dumbasses. You should have made the deal. Have fun paying Pujols (or watching him walk) for 33 mil per year… :)

by Boundforbeach on Apr 26, 2010 6:03 PM EDT reply actions  

This is just the first step in the sign and trade.

by Cormican on Apr 26, 2010 8:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

This deal is horrible.

by packimop on Apr 27, 2010 2:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Couple Points here

This deal doesn’t upset me, and here’s why (a lot of this is not stat-oriented…but bear with me).

1) Howard has kept his nose clean for his whole career. You’ve never heard him badmouth the organization, whine about his dollars, get a drunk driving arrest, or engage in any petty crap. He seems to have good charachter and has his head on straight despite playing in Philly, with one of the toughest and most demanding crowds and he’s streaky. By itself, this is meaningless (ie…Paul Bako might be an upstanding guy…but who cares?).
The odds of Howard doing something dumb to derail his career are minimal, so that minimized the long term risk.
2) Howard has never had an extended DL stint. I’m not sure he’s ever been on it honestly, and if so..it’s probably been the 14-day pulled hammy variety. He’s also lost weight over his career which makes him less likely to wear out earlier (ie..NOT Ortiz and Vaughn).
3) Howard’s fielding appears to have improved during his career. This is not a product of luck, it’s either effort or acquired learning, and I’ll take either. One means he tries hard, one means he’s talented. Don’t really care which it is, both are good.
4) The Phillies might actually be entering excessive spend territory. I’ve lauded Steinbrenner and the Yankees because I wish the Phils spent money like they did. Moves like this make it plausible, albeit still unlikely. (caveat – if this were the case, we’d have probably retained Cliff Lee, but maybe something’s changed in the last couple months?)
5) The bulk of this contract will be spent on Howard during his prime(ish) years. At 36 he’ll be on the tail end. Odds are the last year or two won’t be as good as the rest of them….but if you were Ryan Howard…would you want to sign a contract that expired when you turned 34 or 35? Hell no. So realistically, that’s not an option unless you crazily overpay for the other years. 36 isn’t a horrible age, it’s definitely on the downslope, but not on the cliff.

The Phils are overpaying, but not on an insanity level, consider it a premium they’re paying a hometown good guy who’s singlehandedly carried the team for up to a month at a time.

Now….my hope is that this contract was bugging Howard and he’ll quit having crappy ABs and drill a few into McCovey cove this weekend.

by Bilzo on Apr 26, 2010 7:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice knowin ya Mr. Werth

by philiafan14364 on Apr 26, 2010 7:35 PM EDT reply actions  

This is rediculus

there aren’t many guys who play like howard plays who age well. and thi contract is reall overrating him. Its like even the org doesn’t recognize that his RBIs are due to utley, not howards awesomeness. he’s a very good plaer. he’s not gonna be a great player when he’s 33, 34, and forget about 36. I’ve never been a big fan of his and this just seems stupid to me. we’re really working hard to make ourselves into a low budget yankees-old and expensive. there are definatley better ways to spend this mone. its like people think that he’s 27 years old. i hate ruben Amaro

"Its like the matrix; There is no high or low, only air" - David Krauss

by jpdtrmpt72 on Apr 26, 2010 8:01 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ll tell ya what’s ridiculous: 10:15 start time. Way past my bedtime. Go Phillies!

by Ritty77 on Apr 26, 2010 8:04 PM EDT reply actions  

no, the braves two nights in a row on espn is ridiculous

by j reed on Apr 26, 2010 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

sorry that would the the mets two nights in arow

by j reed on Apr 26, 2010 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like it.

Howard is a potential Hall of Famer. Phillies can’t replace his slugging via free agency or through their minor league system. Signing him now is great. The market will inflate, but only by the teams that have money (Yanks, Dodgers, Mets, Cubs, RedSox, Tigers, WhiteSox, Angels). Werth & Moyer are most likely gone after this year, Raul & Lidge after next year. Gotta extend JRoll next.

by DannyO on Apr 26, 2010 8:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Expected

This deal really has very little to do with Werth, since the extra years dont kick in until after Werth is long gone. If the FO already decided they cant make the math work for Werth, the next move is lock up Howard. Your alternative is to lose both of them.

What deal was everyone expecting?? He is already making $20M. Did you think he would make less in his first FA deal. Did you think he would sign a team friendly 3 year extension?? This is a pretty average deal. It carries a lot of risk, just like any other deal in baseball. It could also be a good deal that keeps a premiere slugger in philly until his mid 30s. And they got it in before Pujols cashes in for 8 years @ 35M a year.

by uspsuperman on Apr 26, 2010 8:52 PM EDT reply actions  

I expected they’d see his current deal through and see if his value drops.

I think this deal is pretty lousy.

by Jay on Apr 26, 2010 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

except if you wait...

You also wait for Pujols, Fielder, and AGon to get their deals around the same time. You actually risk it being even more, especially if he is the last of the 4. Unless Howard drops off catastrophically in the next 5 months they would be doing this deal anyway this offseason. There is no way they can let his deal expire and then hope to resign him. He is clearly not going to take a hometown discount, as he never has, and has had bad blood with his previous deals. If his deal expires, he leaves. And he has shown in previous deals that he has his price and he will stick by it. And he has gotten it every time to boot.

You are either accepting this mediocre deal, or letting him walk. Now your choice could be to let him walk cause he isnt worth it (which i agree with btw), but i dont see his value decreasing that much over the next 5 months that its worth waiting. If you want to keep him, thats the price: 20-25M a year. He basically has the same deal as Teixeira, and I would consider them pretty comparable players for a deal.

by uspsuperman on Apr 26, 2010 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think the deal is mediocre.

I think you have to be prepared to let a guy walk.

You may want to take a look at Travis Hafner’s contract, which is an unmitigated disaster at less than half the price. He was coming off a string of three seasons that surpasses (slightly) even Howard’s best years.

by Jay on Apr 27, 2010 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree w/Jay. This is premature. I don’t believe the pending Pujols deal would have necessarily made this deal cost more. Fielder and AGon…maybe, but maybe not. I’d have been willing to wait. 2010 needed to clarify what the Phils had here, and see in particular if Howard could adjust in any significant way to reversing some worrisome trends. So far, it hasn’t.

by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

the Sports Illustrated article (i think it was in SI) on his struggles with off speed pitches burned my retinas

by j reed on Apr 26, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly. So he spoke to just the right guy (Bonds) in the off-season, started well, moved closer to the plate, and then …. lost the scent. So he’s smart, works hard – but results is results. Would have been more willing to wait until the ASB.

Meanwhile, you look at a guy like Werth – played every game, OBP machine, tremendous plate discipine, and he really hasn’t begun to really slug it yet.

by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

well I saw that breaking ball buster hitch in Howards swing yesterday…that doesn’t bode well. He slows his swing down and it gets beerleagerery. I wonder if there is some type of pattern starting with a decline in walks and then culminating in these "prop up a scrub pitcher’’ swings. That the cue for him to rest to recharge the good ole neurochemistry.

Yeah, Werth is as advertised and then some. Well with the lefty Sanchez in SF we’ll need him to be be on top of his game.

by j reed on Apr 26, 2010 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

i would say the a-rod’s current deal sets the benchmark for pujols. ryans deal just reinforces that pujols gets 30M/yr. good luck cards. (not really)

by #26HOF2B on Apr 26, 2010 9:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Honestly, Pujols is so much better than Howard that if Howard is worth $25 mill per, then Pujols ought to be worth something like $40 mill per.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

no problem…I gotta go to wavva for some late night phillies java, I’ll stop at the atm machine

by j reed on Apr 26, 2010 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

wow five years, given his age I thought three. Then again I’m not saavy in the contracts department but balls thrown in the centerfield over J-Roll’s head will make me really wince a couple million times harder.

by j reed on Apr 26, 2010 9:20 PM EDT reply actions  

WAR

I know I will catch some flak for this, but I welcome it.

WAR is a useful stat, but like many other stats it tries to take a very complicated observation (success at playing baseball) and distill it down to a single, objective, easy-to-compare number. But like any other stat, it’s inherently biased towards certain variables, and more importantly cant possibly account for all variables. Its just one piece of information, meant to be used in combination with lots of other information. Some people seem to worship WAR like its some kind of end-all be-all of a player’s value.

There is a lot to look at when analyzing this deal, Howard’s projected WAR in 5 years is only ONE thing to think about. And how ridiculous is it to try and predict his WAR in 5 years, let alone what the market value of that is.

by uspsuperman on Apr 26, 2010 9:32 PM EDT reply actions  

What else do you propose that people look at other than WAR?

Granting for the sake of argument that predicting WAR five years out is extremely difficult, what other set of metrics do you have in mind that is less “ridiculous” to predict five years out?

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 9:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

well, on the other hand, you can’t just be all, zOMG 45HRs, lots of RBI, what a lovely young man, etc.

You can start with some absolutes – not to be absurd, but at age 60, Howard’s WAR is pretty well certain be 0. Somewhere between that and what it may be at age 37 lay the bounds of a reasonably expected truth.

by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

actually i would hope his WAR < 0 at age 60.

by uspsuperman on Apr 26, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

:) right. But for $125MM, it better be at least 0!

by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

WPA

it accounts for game state. he is pretty damn good in WPA, but that fluctualtes a lot

"Its like the matrix; There is no high or low, only air" - David Krauss

by jpdtrmpt72 on Apr 26, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

If I had that magic number I would be worth 125M too ;)

by uspsuperman on Apr 26, 2010 9:39 PM EDT reply actions  

seriously though, I am not advocating not using it, but when I look at WAR I take it in context with other factors. Some of them stats, trending UZR, BB%, contact rate, wiff rate, HR/FB. But also the evil subjective stuff: leadership, who is his replacement, can his production be adequately replaced, at what cost, how does his body and swing compare with his comparable players.

by uspsuperman on Apr 26, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, basically, I’m pretty ambivalent about this signing.

- Choosing Howard over Werth = OK in theory
- 5 years/$25 million per = too much
- From ages 34-36, Howard will likely be very overpaid
- But I don’t think he’ll be David Ortiz either
- Signing both Howard and Werth = very bad idea

Basically, I think this deal was too generous, which, almost by definition, means that we would have been better off letting Howard walk than signing him to this deal. But I don’t see it turning into an enormous Vernon Wells-style albatross either. If Howard only gives us $20 million of inflation-adjusted value for our $25 million in 2014, that won’t be good, but it won’t be a team killer either.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 9:46 PM EDT reply actions  

i agree, thats what i think too. if he doesnt trend too badly, this will be a mediocre deal, with a chance he actually lives up to it and a chance he grossly under-performs.

by uspsuperman on Apr 26, 2010 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

To me, a mediocre deal would be one where we get exactly what we pay for. I think this is actually likely to be a bad deal. Just not so bad that it’ll ruin our team.

by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s an article on sbnation.com describing this deal as “paying A-Rod money for Fred McGriff.” Honestly, I’m (sorta) OK with that. Paying A-Rod money for Willie McCovey would be better, of course, but as long as RyHo doesn’t turn into Cecil Fielder, this deal shouldn’t hurt too much.

by ThinMountainAir on Apr 26, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Band_small
Bullpenny Lane

Recent FanPosts

Marvel_sixers_small
Bob Davison got suspended by the MLB
Small
2012 Phillies Mock Draft - UPDATED!
31668_127968670553578_100000213381931_332614_1775181_n_small
Pay Cole Hamels! (for his bat)
Stevebrule_small
Battle Hymn of the Republic...revised
Product_1277994256f_small
The Case of Jayson Werth (and the Washington Nationals) vs. Philadelphia
Small
Prospect Rosterbation: Clearwater 10, Brevard County 3
Phanatic_for_profile_small
Something to Ponder
Small
The Phillies Have Gamed Dom Brown's Service Clock - And No One Noticed
Small
Offensive Woes

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Next Game

Washington Nationals
@ Philadelphia Phillies

Tuesday, May 22, 2012, 7:05 PM EDT
Citizens Bank Park

Jordan Zimmermann vs Roy Halladay

Partly cloudy,rain. Winds blowing out to left field at 5-10 m.p.h. Game time temperature around 70.

Complete Coverage >

Yahoo_full_count

Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

Tecumseh_phillies_small FuquaManuel

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Phillyfriar__new2__small PhillyFriar

Associate Blog Lords

Bugs_small taco pal

Greg_luzinski_small Wet Luzinski

-20100715-hamels_avatar_for_rtp_small RememberthePhitans

Phillies1980logo_small schmenkman

Lion_small philsandthrills

Madmen_icon_small lizroscher

Contributors

Ryanred_small petzrawr

Werein_small Phrozen

Trader-joes_small Joecatz

Small Dash Treyhorn

Blogger Emeritus

Colevatar_small Matt Swartz