Phillies, Ryan Howard ink five-year extension through 2016
Jim Salisbury of CSNPhilly.com reports that the Philadelphia Phillies are about to extend first baseman and 2006 National League Most Valuable Player Ryan Howard through the 2016 season, with a deal reported to be worth $125 million.
Even though Howard has lost a ton of weight and is looking much better in the field, committing that much money to a large-bodied first baseman seems like a risky proposition.
Edit: done, per Murphy. Five years, $125 million, with an option year that would raise it to six years, $138 million. I hope he remembers how to draw walks.
Edit #2: the excellent Cot's Baseball Contracts has the financial breakdown.
12: $20M, 13: $20M, 14: $25M, 15: $25M, 16:$25M, 17:$23M club option ($10M buyout)
More in-depth analysis will follow -- both here, and elsewhere around the interwebs -- but I'll leave you with this nugget for now: only once in Howard's career, according to Fangraphs' WAR metric, has he been worth more than the $25 million AAV (average annual value) that this deal will pay him: his MVP season back in 2006.
121 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That’s a lot of Subway sandwiches.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko
those Big Philly Cheesesteaks are expensive
To me the Eagles are like that girlfriend that pisses u off, then u hate her, but the next morning you wake up and remember that thing u love so much about her
by XxBleedGreen5xX on Apr 26, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions
That was my first thought, too. He has to see the writing on the wall at this point.
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko
I guess I might as well pimp my analysis of this from last month while the iron is hot.
http://www.thegoodphight.com/2010/3/18/1379681/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like
by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
which was a great post and equally great comment thread.
My first reaction is that it will just suck to watch Werth play for the Yankees. I don’t want to hate him for that, but we’re both big boys and will get over it. Plus, I have some real qualms about Howard, mostly because he has been so bad the last two weeks at the plate, and this is coming right before the Phillies play arguably the best pitching staff in the league (I know, this is a distorted view compared to 5 years worth of early-to-mid 30s value). I just wish I had more reassurance that he can lay off lefty breaking balls and improve his walk rate. To his credit, he has worked on every deficiency in his game, but this one might be the toughest.
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions
oddly enough, im siding with u on this
TAKE THE FALL, ACT HURT, GET INDIGNANT
by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Apr 26, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions
This is great news. Everyone loves Howard. He’s the man. Werth can be replaced, Dominick Brown is a stud. The trick is finding a replacement for our other corner outfielder.
by orangeandblack20 on Apr 26, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Ben is a good player, but you aren’t going to replace Werth’s right Handed power bat with Ben Francisco (or Brown, for that matter). Maybe if Mayberry suddenly blossomed, but there isn’t another Right Handed outfielder with Power potential ready for the big time for another 3 years, at the earliest.
The lack of Right Handed power concerns me in that scenario some, though I don’t think it’s a doomsday issue. I’d like to have someone from 3-7 in the order who is right handed. I imagine they will have to platoon Francisco or Mayberry with Ibanez next year anyway.
Then yea, big issue :) They might try to ship Ibanez anyways at some point and bring someone new in.
It’s an issue, but not that big of an issue. It’s much more important to have the best possible players on the field than it is to have L/R lineup balance.
Agreed. Also I don’t think Brown has shown significant platoon splits so far.
by ThinMountainAir on Apr 26, 2010 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions
far too much is usually made of lineup ‘balance’
some types of excellent hitters see very little dropoff in production when facing the same handed pitcher (i.e. chase utley 0.913/0.887 career OPS R/L split)
other types of excellent hitters crush the one type of pitcher while having an issue with the other (i.e. ryan howard 1.063/0.752 career OPS R/L split)
overall, its way more important to have excellent hitters in your lineup, regardless of how they swing their bat
nooooooooooooooo
TAKE THE FALL, ACT HURT, GET INDIGNANT
by CoburnsCuddleBuddy on Apr 26, 2010 2:36 PM EDT reply actions
The important question is why was it necessary at this time to do such a thing?
by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 2:42 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I thought it was another belated April fools joke.
by Boundforbeach on Apr 26, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
So he’ll be 36 in the final year of this contract. I suppose it could be worse.
I understand the “big body” concerns, but Howard’s body is somewhat different from Mo Vaughn’s or David Ortiz’s. To me, his body type is about halfway between those guys on one hand and Frank Thomas on the other.
I’m not against choosing Howard over Werth, as I indicated in my earlier post. This deal does seem a bit pricey though. And I would have prioritized extending Rollins first over extending Howard.
I personally disagree with this move…but oh well.
I think Howard is much more replaceable than Werth, and would rather hand 100 million to a guy who works counts deep and plays his position extremely well.
In the abstract, it’s true that Howard is more replaceable than Werth. But in the particular set of circumstances that the Phillies are living in, they actually have Werth’s replacement, whereas they would have to go out and find one for Howard (presumably for another big contract).
by taco pal on Apr 26, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
Agreed
I also feel Rollins is a priority, as we have no replacement for him in our system. Thoughts?
"Tortorella’s got it all wrong ... Gaborik shouldn’t be messing with our skilled player." -Peter Luuko
H’es much older than howard and wouldn’t be worth what he demands right now…the problem is the phillies have nothing in the minors for short or third – and really ned to
by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
He’s 11 months older than Howard, and based on body type probably no worse a bet to stay healthy deep into his 30s. Of course he also has more of an injury history, but it’s not like either of them is Nick Johnson.
I tend to take into account ‘years’ in the league.
Maybe that’s just an NBA thing – Kevin Garnett is younger than many players – but much closer to the end of his career due to the arly start and long minutes he’s logged – might not apply to baseball.
by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
You’re right, it doesn’t apply to baseball to nearly the same extent. These guys play baseball year round whether they’re amateurs or pro players (be it major league or minor league), so the difference is negligible; it’s really all about age.
Very true about the NBA though, with Garnett obviously being the foremost example. (Kinda sad watching him now, isn’t it? Though maybe that also has something to do with him being a Celtic…)
I’ve hated garnett for a while now (ever since that smacked the team mate story)
Kobe is older than most would think as well for the same reasons
by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
I understand that, I know that we are stacked in the outfield in the minors. At the same time, it’s not like Ibeanez is going to get extended, and now we are banking alot on Brown being a MLB contributor next year.
I also do not think this was a below market contract. I don’t know if Werth would have taken a below market contract to stay with the team, but I hope they at least put a feeler to Werth before they did this.
by Clyde Simmons on Apr 26, 2010 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions
It definitely is not sub-market, that’s for sure. I don’t think Werth would have signed for sub-market either, but of course we don’t have proof of that.
We are banking a lot on Brown but I don’t think we have (or ever had) a choice. If Brown turns out to be a bust, we’re screwed no matter what.
No idea if this is really good or bad. Ryan is getting better all around but Werth is much more needed. 1B is basically a power position all around the MLB now, wouldn’t have been hard to find at least someone who can hit 25-30 HR at a more reasonable price for 5 years.
About 2M more per year, but the precedent for Catchers and the precedent for 1B are pretty different.
What’s Howard worth this year? Maybe $25 or $30 million? I don’t see him being worth an average of $25 million in his age 32-36 years. I’m not saying its impossible, but it doesn’t seem likely given his body type and the type of player he is.
The timing of this deal also seems sort of funny. Why not wait till next offseason? I don’t think $125 over five years for a player in his 30’s can be seen as a hometown discount or anything. Even if he has an MVP year this year, I can’t see him getting more somewhere else.
I don’t want to sound pollyanna-ish about this deal, because there are good reasons to have reservations. But you should keep in mind that $25 million in 2015 or 2016 dollars is not the same as $25 million in 2010 dollars. You have to build in inflation and economic growth.
yeah, taking those cost-of-living increases into the equation, and Howard is practically volunteering his time.
The Phillies have a few conspiracy plots to lower the value of the dollar so much that Howard won’t even be able to afford a loaf of bread with his 2016 salary.
by Clyde Simmons on Apr 26, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions
If there is one thing Amaro has been consistent at in his short tenure as GM, it has been tying a lot of money up in players who are or will be on the wrong side of 35 when their deals expire (or begin). I’m very nervous about this deal.
Polanco and Halladay will also be past 35 when their deals expire, but I’m not worrying so much about their contracts because I think they were good for the team.
I guess it’s not as bad as a I initially thought, but still that’s 5 multi-year signings of players who are or will be past 35. That has to be a lot, right?
And that’s the problem – the phillies operate within a budget so if Howard falls off they can’t just pay to replace him
by jemagee on Apr 26, 2010 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Yea but Philly loves our Phillies
I cannot see in the immediate to slightly distant future a home game that doesn’t sell out. And another WS title could give us a competitive national fanbase (fans who aren’t from philly and don’t live in philly…aka mechandise.)
"Although I may not agree with what you're saying, I'll fight to the death for your right to say it. Good day, sir." Pete Griffin
Wow.
I mean, wow.
As taco pal said above, there’s definitely reason to think that Howard will age better than Mo Vaughn and David Ortiz. The man has gotten himself in great shape, and he’s an offensive force to be reckoned with.
On the other hand… wow. $125 million is a helluva lot to commit to someone’s Age 32-36 seasons, especially when they only have one plus tool and provide no value on the defensive spectrum. I definitely agree with those who said that Rollins should have been extended first.
Honestly, I’m still processing this. “Nervous excitement” is probably the best way to describe my mood right now.
$115 M or $ 125 M
Am I adding up these numbers wrong?:
20+20+25+25+25 = $ 115 M
Isn’t this deal for $ 115 M/5yr and NOT $ 125/5yr? (with a possible sixth-year option of $ 23 M making it $ 138/6)
Or am I missing something here?
Either way, that’s a lot of cash and I’m not sure yet how I feel about it (especially considering Howard’s 2010 OPS+ of 99).
And yes— this seems like weird timing to me unless Amaro is also talking with Jason Werth on the side (does anyone know?).
The buyout costs 10 mil so its atelast 125 mil.
by orangeandblack20 on Apr 26, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Wait and see
It’s a done deal, regardless. Makes me wonder what Pujuls will get.
The team does seem as though it is not going to settle for “small market” status. At some point, a big contract will blow up, and it will be interesting to see how that will affect things going forward, if at all.
I am not upset to see Howard signed – he has been a good citizen; he has produced; he has worked on weaknesses (fielding/weight and conditioning). He has demonstrated through significant actions (training/working out) that he sets and achieves goals.
He may suffer injuries, but the implication that he may eat himself out of the league, a la Ortiz/Vaughn/Fielder seems more unlikely to me each year.
Lots of cash, yes. Lots of risk, yes. Could the money have been spent better? Maybe. Was this abysmally stupid? Absolutely not, imo.
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Apr 26, 2010 4:06 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Remember ARod's first contract?
It was for 25 mil a year and people were like WTF, nobody is getting 25 mil a year. I am not so sure they should. Nobody should ever feel bad for Chase, but his 15 mil a year is a pittance now.
What’s funny is I railed on the Rollin’s and Utley contracts. Not cause I didn’t want them here, but because the Phillies gave up so much leverage when they signed them. I have no idea what they think Howard will provide them in 3+ years from now.
For Who? My teammates.
For What? To Win.
How Much? Where do I sign?
I don’t remember how I felt about the Rollins and Utley contracts at the time, but they really turned out to be hugely important to the current success of this team. (And it’s worth noting who negotiated them: Ed Wade.)
“but his 15 mil a year is a pittance now”
Hey, brother, can you spare a pittance?
:)
Remember the Phitans
by RememberthePhitans on Apr 26, 2010 4:15 PM EDT reply actions
The verdicts from Crashburn Alley and Fangraphs are in.
Here is Bill’s take. The money quote, at least as far as I’m concerned:
Most Phillies fans will love the extension, as it keeps a fan favorite in town for a long time. Stat-savvy fans immediately dislike the deal. Most Phillies fans will come to loathe the deal in several years when the Phillies are hamstrung by Howard’s relatively large salary and declining production.
Matthew Carruth from Fangraphs isn’t even that charitable.
Even if you think baseball’s salary per win goes up to $4.25 million this coming offseason and rises at a 5% clip every winter through 2017, Howard will need to produce an average of 4.75 wins from 2012 through 2017 just in order to justify his salary. If you factor in that Howard gets (even more) long-term security from this deal, then that average production levels goes up to 5.3 wins. In other words, Howard will need six seasons that were better than his 2009 season, except over his 32-37 years.
Zo Zone
generally bullish on the deal but wants to question RAJ on timing. But I thought this was interesting:
I’ve gotten the sense recently that the Phillies think they can sign Jayson Werth to a contract extension. It might be because they realize they have to have at least one right-handed bat in the middle of their lineup. But I don’t think today’s deal means Werth is gone. Now, if Werth wants a five-year, $100 million deal, yeah, the Phillies probably won’t sign him to something like that. But if it’s a fair deal — the Roy Halladay, Chase Utley and Jimmy Rollins contract extensions seemed to work out for both parties — then I see a chance at Werth sticking around. They could use him, too.
-
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions
At this point, wouldn’t that be a disaster? I guess we could try to move Ibanez, and I don’t think it’s impossible to hope that we can do it without eating an inordinate amount of salary (if he plays well this year). But if we can’t, then signing Werth means that we will necessarily allow tons of resources to go to waste in 2011, either by (1) benching a ready-to-play Domonic Brown; (2) eating Raul’s salary by relegating him to part-time duty or bench duty; or (3) eating Raul’s salary in a trade. Any one of those options would leave us worse off than we would be otherwise.
Keeping this entire aging core together with long-term, full-market-price contracts is simply not the right decision. It’s a recipe for a long, slow slide into mediocrity. Even the Yankees suffered a bit when they overdid that in 2008, and the Yankees are way richer than we will ever be.
I don’t think it’s a disaster, but it does depend on moving Victorino or Ibanez. Or, RAJ is like me, and keeps forgetting he gave Ibanez a 3-year deal.
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions
My only hope
is that people don’t start calling Ryan Howard the next David Ortiz. Their bodies are just way different to warrant a valid comparison of aging. Ortiz is and was much heavier than Howard and do I even need to mention that Ortiz was busted for PED
Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."
Bleh
I hit post too soon.
I meant to say “Howard is in better shape than Ortiz” and besides, I am not even a huge fan of this deal. I do worry about 5-6 years from now, I just do not think people (and I am not saying anyone here is, but I have seen it elsewhere and it is irritating me) should compare Howard to Ortiz.
Proudly supporting a Flyers team with "no honor."
Suck it Cardinals...
See how cheap this was? And he probably would have taken even less to go back to St. Louis. You stupid dumbasses. You should have made the deal. Have fun paying Pujols (or watching him walk) for 33 mil per year… :)
Couple Points here
This deal doesn’t upset me, and here’s why (a lot of this is not stat-oriented…but bear with me).
1) Howard has kept his nose clean for his whole career. You’ve never heard him badmouth the organization, whine about his dollars, get a drunk driving arrest, or engage in any petty crap. He seems to have good charachter and has his head on straight despite playing in Philly, with one of the toughest and most demanding crowds and he’s streaky. By itself, this is meaningless (ie…Paul Bako might be an upstanding guy…but who cares?).
The odds of Howard doing something dumb to derail his career are minimal, so that minimized the long term risk.
2) Howard has never had an extended DL stint. I’m not sure he’s ever been on it honestly, and if so..it’s probably been the 14-day pulled hammy variety. He’s also lost weight over his career which makes him less likely to wear out earlier (ie..NOT Ortiz and Vaughn).
3) Howard’s fielding appears to have improved during his career. This is not a product of luck, it’s either effort or acquired learning, and I’ll take either. One means he tries hard, one means he’s talented. Don’t really care which it is, both are good.
4) The Phillies might actually be entering excessive spend territory. I’ve lauded Steinbrenner and the Yankees because I wish the Phils spent money like they did. Moves like this make it plausible, albeit still unlikely. (caveat – if this were the case, we’d have probably retained Cliff Lee, but maybe something’s changed in the last couple months?)
5) The bulk of this contract will be spent on Howard during his prime(ish) years. At 36 he’ll be on the tail end. Odds are the last year or two won’t be as good as the rest of them….but if you were Ryan Howard…would you want to sign a contract that expired when you turned 34 or 35? Hell no. So realistically, that’s not an option unless you crazily overpay for the other years. 36 isn’t a horrible age, it’s definitely on the downslope, but not on the cliff.
The Phils are overpaying, but not on an insanity level, consider it a premium they’re paying a hometown good guy who’s singlehandedly carried the team for up to a month at a time.
Now….my hope is that this contract was bugging Howard and he’ll quit having crappy ABs and drill a few into McCovey cove this weekend.
This is rediculus
there aren’t many guys who play like howard plays who age well. and thi contract is reall overrating him. Its like even the org doesn’t recognize that his RBIs are due to utley, not howards awesomeness. he’s a very good plaer. he’s not gonna be a great player when he’s 33, 34, and forget about 36. I’ve never been a big fan of his and this just seems stupid to me. we’re really working hard to make ourselves into a low budget yankees-old and expensive. there are definatley better ways to spend this mone. its like people think that he’s 27 years old. i hate ruben Amaro
"Its like the matrix; There is no high or low, only air" - David Krauss
I like it.
Howard is a potential Hall of Famer. Phillies can’t replace his slugging via free agency or through their minor league system. Signing him now is great. The market will inflate, but only by the teams that have money (Yanks, Dodgers, Mets, Cubs, RedSox, Tigers, WhiteSox, Angels). Werth & Moyer are most likely gone after this year, Raul & Lidge after next year. Gotta extend JRoll next.
Expected
This deal really has very little to do with Werth, since the extra years dont kick in until after Werth is long gone. If the FO already decided they cant make the math work for Werth, the next move is lock up Howard. Your alternative is to lose both of them.
What deal was everyone expecting?? He is already making $20M. Did you think he would make less in his first FA deal. Did you think he would sign a team friendly 3 year extension?? This is a pretty average deal. It carries a lot of risk, just like any other deal in baseball. It could also be a good deal that keeps a premiere slugger in philly until his mid 30s. And they got it in before Pujols cashes in for 8 years @ 35M a year.
I expected they’d see his current deal through and see if his value drops.
I think this deal is pretty lousy.
except if you wait...
You also wait for Pujols, Fielder, and AGon to get their deals around the same time. You actually risk it being even more, especially if he is the last of the 4. Unless Howard drops off catastrophically in the next 5 months they would be doing this deal anyway this offseason. There is no way they can let his deal expire and then hope to resign him. He is clearly not going to take a hometown discount, as he never has, and has had bad blood with his previous deals. If his deal expires, he leaves. And he has shown in previous deals that he has his price and he will stick by it. And he has gotten it every time to boot.
You are either accepting this mediocre deal, or letting him walk. Now your choice could be to let him walk cause he isnt worth it (which i agree with btw), but i dont see his value decreasing that much over the next 5 months that its worth waiting. If you want to keep him, thats the price: 20-25M a year. He basically has the same deal as Teixeira, and I would consider them pretty comparable players for a deal.
I don’t think the deal is mediocre.
I think you have to be prepared to let a guy walk.
You may want to take a look at Travis Hafner’s contract, which is an unmitigated disaster at less than half the price. He was coming off a string of three seasons that surpasses (slightly) even Howard’s best years.
Agree w/Jay. This is premature. I don’t believe the pending Pujols deal would have necessarily made this deal cost more. Fielder and AGon…maybe, but maybe not. I’d have been willing to wait. 2010 needed to clarify what the Phils had here, and see in particular if Howard could adjust in any significant way to reversing some worrisome trends. So far, it hasn’t.
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions
the Sports Illustrated article (i think it was in SI) on his struggles with off speed pitches burned my retinas
exactly. So he spoke to just the right guy (Bonds) in the off-season, started well, moved closer to the plate, and then …. lost the scent. So he’s smart, works hard – but results is results. Would have been more willing to wait until the ASB.
Meanwhile, you look at a guy like Werth – played every game, OBP machine, tremendous plate discipine, and he really hasn’t begun to really slug it yet.
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions
well I saw that breaking ball buster hitch in Howards swing yesterday…that doesn’t bode well. He slows his swing down and it gets beerleagerery. I wonder if there is some type of pattern starting with a decline in walks and then culminating in these "prop up a scrub pitcher’’ swings. That the cue for him to rest to recharge the good ole neurochemistry.
Yeah, Werth is as advertised and then some. Well with the lefty Sanchez in SF we’ll need him to be be on top of his game.
i would say the a-rod’s current deal sets the benchmark for pujols. ryans deal just reinforces that pujols gets 30M/yr. good luck cards. (not really)
WAR
I know I will catch some flak for this, but I welcome it.
WAR is a useful stat, but like many other stats it tries to take a very complicated observation (success at playing baseball) and distill it down to a single, objective, easy-to-compare number. But like any other stat, it’s inherently biased towards certain variables, and more importantly cant possibly account for all variables. Its just one piece of information, meant to be used in combination with lots of other information. Some people seem to worship WAR like its some kind of end-all be-all of a player’s value.
There is a lot to look at when analyzing this deal, Howard’s projected WAR in 5 years is only ONE thing to think about. And how ridiculous is it to try and predict his WAR in 5 years, let alone what the market value of that is.
well, on the other hand, you can’t just be all, zOMG 45HRs, lots of RBI, what a lovely young man, etc.
You can start with some absolutes – not to be absurd, but at age 60, Howard’s WAR is pretty well certain be 0. Somewhere between that and what it may be at age 37 lay the bounds of a reasonably expected truth.
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions
:) right. But for $125MM, it better be at least 0!
by Wet Luzinski on Apr 26, 2010 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions
WPA
it accounts for game state. he is pretty damn good in WPA, but that fluctualtes a lot
"Its like the matrix; There is no high or low, only air" - David Krauss
seriously though, I am not advocating not using it, but when I look at WAR I take it in context with other factors. Some of them stats, trending UZR, BB%, contact rate, wiff rate, HR/FB. But also the evil subjective stuff: leadership, who is his replacement, can his production be adequately replaced, at what cost, how does his body and swing compare with his comparable players.
So, basically, I’m pretty ambivalent about this signing.
- Choosing Howard over Werth = OK in theory
- 5 years/$25 million per = too much
- From ages 34-36, Howard will likely be very overpaid
- But I don’t think he’ll be David Ortiz either
- Signing both Howard and Werth = very bad idea
Basically, I think this deal was too generous, which, almost by definition, means that we would have been better off letting Howard walk than signing him to this deal. But I don’t see it turning into an enormous Vernon Wells-style albatross either. If Howard only gives us $20 million of inflation-adjusted value for our $25 million in 2014, that won’t be good, but it won’t be a team killer either.
i agree, thats what i think too. if he doesnt trend too badly, this will be a mediocre deal, with a chance he actually lives up to it and a chance he grossly under-performs.
There’s an article on sbnation.com describing this deal as “paying A-Rod money for Fred McGriff.” Honestly, I’m (sorta) OK with that. Paying A-Rod money for Willie McCovey would be better, of course, but as long as RyHo doesn’t turn into Cecil Fielder, this deal shouldn’t hurt too much.
by ThinMountainAir on Apr 26, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
































