Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: An Explanation For Some Of The Perplexing HOF Snubs

Barrage a Trois: Phillies 8, Dodgers 4

Brian Schneider and Ryan Howard paced the Phillies' offensive attack with a pair of three run homers, and Carlos Ruiz capped off the scoring with a two-RBI single of his bitch, Jonathon Broxton, en route to an 8-4 Phillies victory over the Dodgers.  The Phillies battered former farmhand Carlos Montaserios for five runs on five hits in two plus innings pitched.

Phillies starter Kyle Kendrick showed signs of the same lack of command that defined his previous start, including a walked in run in the first.  Kendrick escaped further damage on a double play ground ball.  Kendrick's night ended after a two run homer by James Loney in the bottom of the 6th inning.  He allowed seven hits and one walk, with no strikeouts, in five full innings pitched.

Howard's home run was his first in over a month, and his first extra base hit since returning from the disabled list.

The Phillies' bullpen turned in another outstanding effort, with Chad Durbin, J.C. Romero, Ryan Madson, and Brad Lidge turning in a combined four innings of one hit, no run relief.

20100831_phillies_dodgers_0_medium

via www.fangraphs.com


Comment 69 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Is that in reference to this band?

Either way, well done.

"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."

by boknows71 on Sep 1, 2010 8:41 AM EDT reply actions  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQrHcy3p9vU

"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."

by boknows71 on Sep 1, 2010 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

It could also be a reference to the 2 three run homers hit last night.

by JoshuaR on Sep 1, 2010 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand and as usual they have more than 1 meaning many times. I guess I likes me some well written headlines.

"Call me dumb, call me stupid, whatever. I block shots."

by boknows71 on Sep 1, 2010 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nice win last night

Phils finally got some hitting and the bullpen had an excellent night. An okay start by Kendrick but I will take it from a #5 starter.

by JoshuaR on Sep 1, 2010 8:42 AM EDT reply actions  

I wouldnt, I really hope they bring in some serious #5 competition for KK next spring.

by Nikk.m on Sep 1, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

From the minors, sure. But if you pay for a #5 starter, you’re almost certainly misallocating your resources.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. We have more pressing needs to use payroll on than a #5 starter.

by JoshuaR on Sep 1, 2010 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would like to see them extend Jimmy Rollins, first and foremost.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think this brings up an interesting question:

Who are the most important players (WRT: position and pitcher (SP and RP)) to bring back after their contract is up or extend now?

SP: Hamels – Still under current contract with a 4th year arb eligibility in 2012
RP: Madson – FA after 2011
IN/OF: J-Roll – FA after 2011

by Get A Grip on Sep 1, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Easy.. all of them. If we had a budding prospect at SS, then I could let go of Rollins, but since we dont and there will not be anyone better on the market I dont think we have a choice.

by Nikk.m on Sep 1, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would actually like to see them lock up Cole sometime next year.

by Nikk.m on Sep 1, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I hope those negotiation go well. I have a bad feeling.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

4 years/50mil should do it?

by Nikk.m on Sep 1, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Phillies do not give contracts longer than 3 years to pitchers as a matter of organizational policy.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you’re name is Roy Halladay… you get a 4th year option.

by Get A Grip on Sep 1, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Plus this year, making it potentially 5.

by Nikk.m on Sep 1, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Options are different.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Technically they commited 4 years to Halladay (this year, plus 3 year extension). In Cole’s case the first of those 4 years will still be an Arb-controlled year. And finally you have to make exceptions in exceptional cases and a home-grown ace would qualify.

by Nikk.m on Sep 1, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps. I think it would be wise to wait until later though. The price may go up, but the injury risk is so significant that I think I would prefer the first risk.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

by dannijd on Sep 1, 2010 10:27 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Is Nate Robertson a possibility, or does his contract end at the end of the season?

by dannijd on Sep 1, 2010 9:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Those choices are not mutually exclusive. That said, Robertson is not better than Kendrick.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

True… anybody down on the farm who could be a legitimate threat to Kyle? (at least provide competition, and perhaps a better (but still cost controlled) option?

by dannijd on Sep 1, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Worley is probably the top candidate. Carpenter, maybe, with a strong spring.

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Sep 1, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think they’ll go with Carpenter, because he’s always been groomed as the next starter, but I don’t think he’ll make it.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think the chances that they will select Carpenter are extremely slim.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I hope you are correct, but for the past couple years, it seems every time they need a spot start that isn’t a bullpen game, they go with him.

I guess a lot of that is that he’s on the 40 man, but it just doesn’t seem they’ve found another minor league guy that they’re comfortable giving that chance too, and there’s no budding superstar who’s close enough yet.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Carpenter has exactly one game start in his major league career.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

wow…i really thought he’d done it 2-3 times. I see that’s all the games he’s made it into though.

To that effect…who else have they called up for a spot start since then?

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

the answer is:
Fabio Castro, John Ennis, and Zack Segovia, all in 2007, none of which are still in the organization.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

In any event, even if the team felt that someone was the best option to make a spot start in 2009, it does not follow that the team will feel that the same person will be the best option to be a starter in 2011 unless the alternatives in 2011 are identical to the alternatives that existed in 2009.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

agreed. So who are you saying gets thrown in the mix?

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 10:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Worley, possibly Robertson, possibly Moyer or another cheap FA. They also have the alternative of sticking with Kendrick, which, while not very exciting, would likely turn out better than switching to Carpenter.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t get why people expect so much out of a #5 starter. He has been productive from his spot. He has a 0.6 WAR. Again, from a #5 starter, I enjoy his production this year. We don’t have anyone better than him this year and he is pretty cheap.

by JoshuaR on Sep 1, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not gonna go with “enjoy”, but he’s definitely adequate considering the rest of the rotation.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Satisfied is a better word to describe my feelings about him.

by JoshuaR on Sep 1, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

ok…I’ll agree with that one.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 10:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fifth starter isn’t a difficult position to upgrade, though, if you take some educated gambles in the offseason with minor league free agents, non tenders, and bargain basement guys.

It wasn’t worth worrying about upgrading that spot for the season’s final month, but the front office shouldn’t consider Kendrick a stone cold lock for the rotation next year.

by PhillyFriar on Sep 1, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

With Kendrick becoming arbitration eligible at the end of this year, is there any chance that he is not even in the mix for next season?

by dannijd on Sep 1, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think it mostly has to with the fact that he is so inconsistent.

by PSUcup1 on Sep 1, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Which is to be expected from a #5 starter. Not everyone can be as good as Halladay.

by JoshuaR on Sep 1, 2010 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Inconsistent

Because he doesn’t get not enough K’s. There’s only few guys who have ever been able to locate that well without striking guys out. Your inevitably gonna put guys on base when you average 2k’s a game and then it’s a matter how fortunate your are to have balls hit to your defenders. So either he gets more K’s or improves his location.

by j reed on Sep 1, 2010 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

In 6 PA’s against Broxton, Ruiz has this triple slash line: 1.000/1.000/1.750.

by ThinMountainAir on Sep 1, 2010 8:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Decent…

"I tried to run him over but Eli had his big boy pads on and he kind of stopped me from getting in the end zone. The next time I’ll try to jump over his head.’’ - Asante Samuel

by foos05 on Sep 1, 2010 9:02 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I understand that it is a very small sample size, but considering his success rate, I did not understand why Torre did not leave the other pitcher in- I understand that he is a lefty specialist, but he pitched to Werth, and Ruiz is a Broxton specialist if such a thing ever existed.

by dannijd on Sep 1, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

maybe to give Broxton a chance to exorcise his demons?

Lets be realistic here, the Dodgers are essentially out of the race. Maybe he’s trying to fix Broxton for next year.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

thought the same thing

by j reed on Sep 1, 2010 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wooo 8 RUNS… and a Howard HR!!!

by Ant on Sep 1, 2010 9:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Board Poll:

Now that September has arrived, I was just curious to see how confident the board here is on the team:

A) Winning the division
B) Winning the wild card
C) Not making the playoffs

I would go with:
A) 20%
B) 60%
C) 20% (the bats still have me worried a bit)

by PSUcup1 on Sep 1, 2010 9:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I think that’s pretty fair. FWIW, BBProspectus puts it at:
14/44/42 (standard SIM)
27/46/26 (PECOTA SIM)
23/46/31 (ELO SIM)

Taking the average of the 3 (which may or may not be appropriate) yields:
22% to win the division
45% to win the wild card
33% to be sitting at home.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for that.

For what it’s worth, I’ve always gravitated toward the PECOTA sim, because I like its emphasis on individual player projections combined with updated depth charts.

by PhillyFriar on Sep 1, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Holy sliders, Batman

This would be Aroldis Chapman. Whoa:

Keys to the Game: Offense, Offense!! Where are you?

by LeepinLizardz on Sep 1, 2010 9:50 AM EDT reply actions  

I love the reference to Broxton Ruiz’s Bitch it sure seems that way. Wait it is that way.

I wasn't even a year old but I stayed up to be outside the Vet with my Dad and Mom when the Phillies won the World Series 1980.

by Christopher A on Sep 1, 2010 10:03 AM EDT reply actions  

Before you go too far...

Remember three little words… Small Sample Size.

by dannijd on Sep 1, 2010 10:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Regardless of sample size… the not so distant and horrifying past he’s had with the Phillies and Ruiz plays a big mental part of his pitching woe’s.

by Get A Grip on Sep 1, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think the sample’s going to get any larger this year, and next year, who knows if Broxton will be the closer or not? For what it’s been so far, Ruiz owns Broxton.

by phillyinportland on Sep 3, 2010 3:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Begging next week, the Phils have an off day (thurs) for the next four weeks. With us trailing 3 games behind the Braves, do you think there is any chance we drop Kendrick in favor of a four man rotation? I know there was some discussion of this by Charlie weeks ago, but I hadn’t heard anything about it lately.

by Boundforbeach on Sep 1, 2010 10:32 AM EDT reply actions  

“Beginning” not “begging”. Freudian slip facepalm.

by Boundforbeach on Sep 1, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

You can’t really drop him unless you’re okay with some starters going on short rest. The off day will not eliminate the short-rest issue entirely.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

at some point in the next 2 weeks they shuffle the rotation though to line up the big 3 so they all go against Atlanta…right?

by PSUcup1 on Sep 1, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Depends. If the games turn out to be as important as they look like they’ll be, I don’t see how you can use Kendrick in them. But Blanton would be fine.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Conidering Oswalt’s record v. The Braves, is it possible the team tries to shift it to avoid him? (I do not remember the numbers off hand, but remember that his overall history v. The braves was significantly worse than his overall record.

by dannijd on Sep 1, 2010 11:12 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

they won’t do it, but I tend to put some faith in those trends. Glavine always sucked against ATL after he left, yet the Mets kept running him out there against them.

by Bilzo on Sep 1, 2010 9:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even ignoring sample size, I don’t see why those trends should be seen as being at all meaningful. As Jerry Seinfeld would put it, those are just stats against laundry. The actual guys who are currently on the Braves don’t have unusually good numbers against Oswalt. Mostly they haven’t really faced him very much.

by taco pal on Sep 1, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.

Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

198222_nlds_reds_phillies_baseball_small FuquaManuel

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Phillyfriar__new2__small PhillyFriar

Associate Blog Lords

Bugs_small taco pal

Greg_luzinski_small Wet Luzinski

Cptjackalbatross_small RememberthePhitans

Phillies1980logo_small schmenkman

Madmen_icon_small lizroscher

Blogger Emeritus

Colevatar_small Matt Swartz