Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sixers Vs. Celtics: Countdown To Game Seven

This Week's Pitching Probables (Sept. 24-29)

Below are the current pitching probables for the weekend home series vs. the Mets and the Monday-Wednesday road series in Washington. As always, some guesswork is involved.

The most notable tidbit here is that Kyle Kendrick (whose turn was originally scheduled to come up on Friday and Wednesday) has been flipped with Joe Blanton (originally scheduled to pitch on Saturday). This makes sense because we have nine games left, meaning that four of our five starting pitchers will start two more games, while the fifth guy will start only one more game. Since Blanton is a good pitcher while Kendrick is not, the fifth guy should clearly be Kendrick.

Charlie had originally bumped Kendrick all the way back to Monday, but before last night's game he changed his mind and decided that Kendrick would pitch on Saturday after all. The basis of his decision was that he wanted to give Hamels and Halladay an extra day of rest before their next scheduled turns. Of course, that will just mean that Halladay and Hamels will lose an extra day of rest before their following turns (in the October 1-3 Atlanta series). It also means that if the Phils get rained out on Sunday, Monday, or Tuesday, we might get stuck with Kyle Kendrick being the only fully-rested starter available to pitch on one of the days of the Atlanta series.

But since the Phils completed the sweep of the Braves last night, that's probably all moot.


Day Pitcher G GS IP K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BABIP GB% LD% FB% HR/FB ERA FIP xFIP SIERA
Friday Blanton 26 26 160.2 6.83 2.13 1.40 .337 42.8 18.8 38.4 12.3% 5.04 4.36 4.06 3.99
Dickey 24 24 160.1 5.33 2.19 0.67 .280 54.3 17.1 28.5 8.3% 2.92 3.67 3.93 4.12
Saturday Kendrick 31 29 169.1 4.15 2.44 1.38 .289 44.5 17.0 38.5 11.6% 4.78 5.03 4.85 4.95
Gee 3 3 20.0 4.50 4.50 0.45 .205 47.5 6.8 45.8 3.7% 1.80 4.24 5.43 5.50
Sunday Hamels* 31 31 202.2 9.19 2.53 1.07 .294 45.3 17.1 37.6 11.9% 2.93 3.55 3.37 3.12
Misch* 9 4 24.1 3.70 0.74 0.74 .346 50.5 16.1 33.3 6.5% 4.44 3.58 4.26 4.52
Monday Halladay 32 32 241.2 7.93 1.12 0.89 .304 51.1 19.0 29.9 11.5% 2.53 3.07 2.95 2.95
Lannan* 24 24 137.2 4.45 3.14 0.85 .326 51.6 21.0 27.4 9.8% 4.58 4.44 4.53 4.72
Tuesday Oswalt 31 31 205.2 8.27 2.32 0.83 .262 44.9 18.2 36.9 9.4% 2.80 3.29 3.43 3.31
Marquis 12 12 52.2 4.10 3.93 1.37 .329 50.3 19.6 30.2 14.0 7.18 5.92 5.42 5.18
Wednesday Blanton 26 26 160.2 6.83 2.13 1.40 .337 42.8 18.8 38.4 12.3% 5.04 4.36 4.06 3.99
Detwiler* 7 4 25.0 5.40 4.32 0.36 .319 43.9 23.2 32.9 3.7% 2.52 3.97 4.93 5.06


[Table and photo caption updated 9/23 4:30PM EDT, h/t JHobbs in comments]
[Table updated again 9/24 11:30AM EDT because Detwiler pitched yesterday]

Comment 54 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

For some reason I don’t have my warm and fuzzy going into this series.

Hey Dez, it's 2am do you know where your mother is?

by sowhatifitisasportste on Sep 23, 2010 3:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Gee... I wonder why...

Could it be the Dickey going against us?

Or maybe it is the Blanton and Kendrick show going for us?

Or the fact that the Phillies last loss (before sweeping the other three teams in the division) was to the Mets?

At any rate, totally understandable.

by dannijd on Sep 23, 2010 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

So many great Dickey jokes to be made.

Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.

by doubleh on Sep 23, 2010 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

That face is hilarious. HARF HARF HARF

by ThinMountainAir on Sep 23, 2010 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

So we’ll be facing five straight starting pitchers with K/9 rates between 4.10 and 5.33.

by taco pal on Sep 23, 2010 3:14 PM EDT reply actions  

It’s really not fair that H2O are facing three of those guys.

by phatj on Sep 23, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Indeed. And my heart breaks for them.

by taco pal on Sep 23, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

cheezit, and look how many guys also have BB/9 rates at or near 4. Say what you will about the talent-deprived Kendrick, but he doesn’t walk that many guys.

by Wet Luzinski on Sep 24, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

4-2 these next two series

All I want. I’ll take 3-3 on the assumption that SD/SF/Cincy/Atlanta each lose a game. We do that, and the Sunday-Tuesday starts from H2O are their last of the regular season.

by wildcatlh on Sep 23, 2010 3:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I’m just glad we miss Niese. Dickey and Pelfrey are solid enough pitchers (and, of course, Dickey’s having a fantastic year), and Gee has something of the X factor element going for him, so this Mets series isn’t likely to be a walkover.

The Nats series, on the other hand, lines up really well for us.

by PhillyFriar on Sep 23, 2010 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Cholly

I wonder if The Phorce can only be with one manager at a time in S Philly…

"He's a bum...this one stinks...this jerk can't play."-- A father teaching his daughter the Phillies lineup from the program roster, the Vet, c.1998

by MikeEinNC on Sep 23, 2010 3:22 PM EDT reply actions  

I really hope that we clinch with a win rather than a Braves loss. Unless, of course, the Braves lose in some sort of hilarious way, like Matt Diaz getting picked off third base with two outs in the ninth inning of a one-run game.

by taco pal on Sep 23, 2010 3:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Not like Tony Romo botching a hold to lose the game, but up there in my pantheon of season-enders.

Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.

by doubleh on Sep 23, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

BEST DAY EVER

Hey Dez, it's 2am do you know where your mother is?

by sowhatifitisasportste on Sep 23, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

on Fan Appreciation Day would be kind of boss, don’t you think.

by Wet Luzinski on Sep 24, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dickey...

maybe we should field a line up of Sweeney, Valdez, Bocock, Dobbs, Ben, Dom, Gload and Hoover that game. Still have nightmares of the 2 knuckleballers sending us into an offensive abyss…

by PSUcup1 on Sep 23, 2010 4:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think that is as big a worry here… Since then, the Phillies have faced Dickey twice more, and Wakefield once, to a 2-1 record. More importantly, the offense (even when it tanked in Dickey’s most recent start against the Phillies) did not stay there. They will be fine. Dickey alone will not kill them. (Now if you told me that the weekend featured Dice-K + Wakefield + Dickey, then I might worry, as that hat trick caused Slumpmas the first time!) Play the starters and go for the win!

by dannijd on Sep 23, 2010 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

anyone else a bit annoyed that the media keeps saying Charlie altered his rotation so that the Big 3 faced Atlanta? I mean when I hear that a manager altered his rotation,to me it means guys went on short rest or there was a drastic change… as we know none of that happened.

not sure why it bothers me but it does….

by PSUcup1 on Sep 23, 2010 4:11 PM EDT reply actions  

While the media is overblowing this, the fact is that Manuel did do what he had to do (a little thing considering the off days, but still a change) to insure that the Big 3 would face Atlanta. Meanwhile, Bobby Cox did not use the off days over the last several weeks to insure that he could throw his best pitchers at the Phillies. This is a huge contrast, and one that paid dividends to the Phillies, so it makes a ton of sense that it is being a little overblown.

by dannijd on Sep 23, 2010 11:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

A slight change for the Mets

Mets are throwing Dickey Friday, Gee on Saturday, and Pat Misch on Sunday per mlb.com. Mets want to give Pelfrey an extra day rest.

All you will think about as your vision closes to a black pinpoint will be Brad Lidge surfing a non-deceptive fastball into somebody who is prepared to club it out into the seats.

by JHobbs on Sep 23, 2010 4:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Interesting. Dickey just keeps on moving up. He was originally set for Sunday until Mejia got hurt. I’ll revise the table.

by taco pal on Sep 23, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait – I understand putting Misch ahead of BIG PELF if you want to give BIG PELF a rest, but what’s the point of flip-flopping Dickey and Gee?

by taco pal on Sep 23, 2010 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s the Mets, stop trying to figure out the logic as we don’t want your head to explode.

by JoshuaR on Sep 23, 2010 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

They think the Dickey knuckleball effect will carry over throughout the weekend that way? /sarcasm

Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.

by doubleh on Sep 23, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have to think that the knuckles are going to fall off the Dickeybus soon.

by Phrozen on Sep 23, 2010 5:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Good stuff from TC:


Let’s hope this is the beginning of their big swoon
and they lose the rest of their games this season (especially the last 3 against the Bravos.)

So we are going to come off a sweep of the Braves and suddenly tank the season? Talk about optimism.

by JoshuaR on Sep 23, 2010 7:06 PM EDT reply actions  

If you don’t have hope, you have nothing.

Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.

by doubleh on Sep 23, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Swoons happen— ask the Mets.

by dannijd on Sep 23, 2010 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know. I mean, was it really a “collapse” or just a bit of regression? Did the Mets play a bit over their heads in 2007?

Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.

by doubleh on Sep 23, 2010 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Their bullpen in particular was mad, bad, and dangerous to know.

by Wet Luzinski on Sep 24, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

careful— regression means that they play according to their true abilities from that point forward, not that they play below them later on to average things out. the mets weren’t a 4 wins per 17 games kind of team in 2007. their regression should have been 9 wins per 17 instead of their previus pace of 10 or whatever.

by Matt Swartz on Sep 24, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

So, what you’re saying is that it was a combination of regressing and choking? Spectacular fail.

Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.

by doubleh on Sep 24, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

All I want to see

is proper management of the starters the rest of the way. If I see Charlie putting Halladay in for another damn complete game against the Nationals, I will blow a gasket.

No more than 6 more innings total, for Halladay. If they clinch the division before the series with the Braves, don’t start ANY of the big three for that series, and instead rest the majority of the team and send the scrubs down to Atlanta. Seriously – field a team with backups for that series.

by MyronBales on Sep 23, 2010 7:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Do you remember what the Cubs did to Doc on incredibly long rest?

I don’t know that you go with an entirely scrub team against Atlanta for 2 reasons. Firstly, I am not so sure that Atlanta in the playoffs is an award winning idea. Although considering that the other option may be the Giants, your mileage may vary.

Further (and this is even something that Halladay said recently), overly long rest leads to rust- 5 or even 6 days is great, but much more knocks him (and possibly many pitchers) off of their game. A better idea may be to send all of them to Atlanta, and let each of them “start” on their assigned day. These starts would be minimal workloads- think 3-5 innings each and no more than 60-80 pitches each, allowing the pitchers to stay in rhythm while also giving them rest.

by dannijd on Sep 24, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Dickey

I wonder what his contract situation is. He might be a surprising FA this winter.

"I remember being three and I wanted to be a baseball player, that's all I ever really wanted to be. That and Spider Man." -Raul Ibanez

by Jose and the Contrarians on Sep 23, 2010 7:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Would that only be the case of a non-tender? I was under the impression that he is still under arb control by the Mets, but I could be wrong on this.

by WanderingMoses on Sep 23, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, arb eligible. I don’t think the Mets will non-tender him, although there’s a decent argument that maybe they should.

by taco pal on Sep 23, 2010 7:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably cost and the fear that he will never have another season like this one.

by WanderingMoses on Sep 23, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Considering that offering him arbitration only locks them into giving him a one year contract, and the instability within their starting pitching rotation for next year (Santana likely to miss at least the beginning), what would be the harm in going to arbitration with him? Is the chance that he will get a big contract that big?

by dannijd on Sep 24, 2010 12:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

As opposed to a small contract that big?

by Phrozen on Sep 24, 2010 2:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yankees on way to losing means Phils tied for best MLB record

by Sept.28.Oct.27.Dec.28.2008 on Sep 23, 2010 9:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Nope – you forgot the Twins.

by David S. Cohen on Sep 23, 2010 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dang loss column preventing the three way tie!

by dannijd on Sep 24, 2010 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Highest BABIP: No Misching the connection.

What’s this 10 – 0 stuff?
You have some sort of agenda?

Someone on Bleed Cubbie Blue (Where the Nomadic SBNation Wanderlusting Whore spent an uncomfortable hour or two today) mentioned that their MLB channel was giving them the Yankee game.

I said “Yeah, East Coast bias. Watch where the World Series ends up this year. Both teams.

If you never ask, you'll never know.
But where's the integrity in saying you never knew if you never asked?

by victor frankenstein on Sep 24, 2010 1:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Phils can clinch playoff spot tonight

…with one more win and one more loss by each of the Padres and Giants. This relies on the 3 game series that the Padres and Giants play to end the season, which will ensure that one of the teams will incur two additional losses.

by Vaughn Haze on Sep 24, 2010 10:50 AM EDT reply actions  

i think you’re right!! i totally didn’t realize they were playing each other. i can’t believe this hasn’t been discussed more!

by Matt Swartz on Sep 24, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't there

You’re right. If the “worst case scenario” for the Phillies were to happen after that, this is what it would look like:

Phillies lose 8 straight to end the season after winning tonight: Final record 93-69
Braves win out: Final record 95-67
Padres go 8-2 to end the season (lose tonight, win next 2 vs Reds, sweep Cubs, win 2/3 over Giants): Final record 93-69
Giants go 6-3 to end the season (lose tonight, win next 5, win 1/3 over Padres): Final record 92-70. (interchangeable with the Padres depending on what happens in that series)

Braves win the East, Padres (or Giants) win the West, Phillies as WC. Not like that’s a nice scenario mind you, but it’s always good to clinch.

(it works, whaddya know)

by wildcatlh on Sep 24, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

So, this would be the “other” magic number, which I guess is three to clinch a playoff spot. I seem to remember that being celebrated by some teams in the past.

by phillyinportland on Sep 24, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the record

I dig this feature, TP. Gives a look and saves me from looking it up. And you said you weren’t a research assistant.

by Cormican on Sep 24, 2010 5:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Band_small
Bullpenny Lane

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Non-front paged Bud Vugger Memorial Pick 6 thread - 5/24/12
Av1_small
Pick 6 5/23/12
Marvel_sixers_small
Bob Davison got suspended by the MLB
Small
2012 Phillies Mock Draft - UPDATED!
31668_127968670553578_100000213381931_332614_1775181_n_small
Pay Cole Hamels! (for his bat)
Stevebrule_small
Battle Hymn of the Republic...revised
Product_1277994256f_small
The Case of Jayson Werth (and the Washington Nationals) vs. Philadelphia
Small
Prospect Rosterbation: Clearwater 10, Brevard County 3
Phanatic_for_profile_small
Something to Ponder

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Next Game

Philadelphia Phillies
@ St. Louis Cardinals

Thursday, May 24, 2012, 8:15 PM EDT
Busch Stadium

Joe Blanton vs Jake Westbrook

Clear. Winds blowing out to left field at 15-20 m.p.h. Game time temperature around 85.

Complete Coverage >

Yahoo_full_count

Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

Tecumseh_phillies_small FuquaManuel

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Phillyfriar__new2__small PhillyFriar

Associate Blog Lords

Bugs_small taco pal

Greg_luzinski_small Wet Luzinski

-20100715-hamels_avatar_for_rtp_small RememberthePhitans

Phillies1980logo_small schmenkman

Lion_small philsandthrills

Madmen_icon_small lizroscher

Contributors

Ryanred_small petzrawr

Werein_small Phrozen

Trader-joes_small Joecatz

Small Dash Treyhorn

Blogger Emeritus

Colevatar_small Matt Swartz