This Week's Pitching Probables (Sept. 24-29)
Below are the current pitching probables for the weekend home series vs. the Mets and the Monday-Wednesday road series in Washington. As always, some guesswork is involved.
The most notable tidbit here is that Kyle Kendrick (whose turn was originally scheduled to come up on Friday and Wednesday) has been flipped with Joe Blanton (originally scheduled to pitch on Saturday). This makes sense because we have nine games left, meaning that four of our five starting pitchers will start two more games, while the fifth guy will start only one more game. Since Blanton is a good pitcher while Kendrick is not, the fifth guy should clearly be Kendrick.
Charlie had originally bumped Kendrick all the way back to Monday, but before last night's game he changed his mind and decided that Kendrick would pitch on Saturday after all. The basis of his decision was that he wanted to give Hamels and Halladay an extra day of rest before their next scheduled turns. Of course, that will just mean that Halladay and Hamels will lose an extra day of rest before their following turns (in the October 1-3 Atlanta series). It also means that if the Phils get rained out on Sunday, Monday, or Tuesday, we might get stuck with Kyle Kendrick being the only fully-rested starter available to pitch on one of the days of the Atlanta series.
But since the Phils completed the sweep of the Braves last night, that's probably all moot.
| Day | Pitcher | G | GS | IP | K/9 | BB/9 | HR/9 | BABIP | GB% | LD% | FB% | HR/FB | ERA | FIP | xFIP | SIERA |
| Friday | Blanton | 26 | 26 | 160.2 | 6.83 | 2.13 | 1.40 | .337 | 42.8 | 18.8 | 38.4 | 12.3% | 5.04 | 4.36 | 4.06 | 3.99 |
| Dickey | 24 | 24 | 160.1 | 5.33 | 2.19 | 0.67 | .280 | 54.3 | 17.1 | 28.5 | 8.3% | 2.92 | 3.67 | 3.93 | 4.12 | |
| Saturday | Kendrick | 31 | 29 | 169.1 | 4.15 | 2.44 | 1.38 | .289 | 44.5 | 17.0 | 38.5 | 11.6% | 4.78 | 5.03 | 4.85 | 4.95 |
| Gee | 3 | 3 | 20.0 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 0.45 | .205 | 47.5 | 6.8 | 45.8 | 3.7% | 1.80 | 4.24 | 5.43 | 5.50 | |
| Sunday | Hamels* | 31 | 31 | 202.2 | 9.19 | 2.53 | 1.07 | .294 | 45.3 | 17.1 | 37.6 | 11.9% | 2.93 | 3.55 | 3.37 | 3.12 |
| Misch* | 9 | 4 | 24.1 | 3.70 | 0.74 | 0.74 | .346 | 50.5 | 16.1 | 33.3 | 6.5% | 4.44 | 3.58 | 4.26 | 4.52 | |
| Monday | Halladay | 32 | 32 | 241.2 | 7.93 | 1.12 | 0.89 | .304 | 51.1 | 19.0 | 29.9 | 11.5% | 2.53 | 3.07 | 2.95 | 2.95 |
| Lannan* | 24 | 24 | 137.2 | 4.45 | 3.14 | 0.85 | .326 | 51.6 | 21.0 | 27.4 | 9.8% | 4.58 | 4.44 | 4.53 | 4.72 | |
| Tuesday | Oswalt | 31 | 31 | 205.2 | 8.27 | 2.32 | 0.83 | .262 | 44.9 | 18.2 | 36.9 | 9.4% | 2.80 | 3.29 | 3.43 | 3.31 |
| Marquis | 12 | 12 | 52.2 | 4.10 | 3.93 | 1.37 | .329 | 50.3 | 19.6 | 30.2 | 14.0 | 7.18 | 5.92 | 5.42 | 5.18 | |
| Wednesday | Blanton | 26 | 26 | 160.2 | 6.83 | 2.13 | 1.40 | .337 | 42.8 | 18.8 | 38.4 | 12.3% | 5.04 | 4.36 | 4.06 | 3.99 |
| Detwiler* | 7 | 4 | 25.0 | 5.40 | 4.32 | 0.36 | .319 | 43.9 | 23.2 | 32.9 | 3.7% | 2.52 | 3.97 | 4.93 | 5.06 |
[Table and photo caption updated 9/23 4:30PM EDT, h/t JHobbs in comments]
[Table updated again 9/24 11:30AM EDT because Detwiler pitched yesterday]
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For some reason I don’t have my warm and fuzzy going into this series.
Hey Dez, it's 2am do you know where your mother is?
by sowhatifitisasportste on Sep 23, 2010 3:06 PM EDT reply actions
Gee... I wonder why...
Could it be the Dickey going against us?
Or maybe it is the Blanton and Kendrick show going for us?
Or the fact that the Phillies last loss (before sweeping the other three teams in the division) was to the Mets?
At any rate, totally understandable.
That face is hilarious. HARF HARF HARF
by ThinMountainAir on Sep 23, 2010 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions
cheezit, and look how many guys also have BB/9 rates at or near 4. Say what you will about the talent-deprived Kendrick, but he doesn’t walk that many guys.
by Wet Luzinski on Sep 24, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
4-2 these next two series
All I want. I’ll take 3-3 on the assumption that SD/SF/Cincy/Atlanta each lose a game. We do that, and the Sunday-Tuesday starts from H2O are their last of the regular season.
I’m just glad we miss Niese. Dickey and Pelfrey are solid enough pitchers (and, of course, Dickey’s having a fantastic year), and Gee has something of the X factor element going for him, so this Mets series isn’t likely to be a walkover.
The Nats series, on the other hand, lines up really well for us.
Cholly
I wonder if The Phorce can only be with one manager at a time in S Philly…
"He's a bum...this one stinks...this jerk can't play."-- A father teaching his daughter the Phillies lineup from the program roster, the Vet, c.1998
I really hope that we clinch with a win rather than a Braves loss. Unless, of course, the Braves lose in some sort of hilarious way, like Matt Diaz getting picked off third base with two outs in the ninth inning of a one-run game.
Not like Tony Romo botching a hold to lose the game, but up there in my pantheon of season-enders.
Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.
BEST DAY EVER
Hey Dez, it's 2am do you know where your mother is?
by sowhatifitisasportste on Sep 23, 2010 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions
on Fan Appreciation Day would be kind of boss, don’t you think.
by Wet Luzinski on Sep 24, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
Dickey...
maybe we should field a line up of Sweeney, Valdez, Bocock, Dobbs, Ben, Dom, Gload and Hoover that game. Still have nightmares of the 2 knuckleballers sending us into an offensive abyss…
I don’t think that is as big a worry here… Since then, the Phillies have faced Dickey twice more, and Wakefield once, to a 2-1 record. More importantly, the offense (even when it tanked in Dickey’s most recent start against the Phillies) did not stay there. They will be fine. Dickey alone will not kill them. (Now if you told me that the weekend featured Dice-K + Wakefield + Dickey, then I might worry, as that hat trick caused Slumpmas the first time!) Play the starters and go for the win!
anyone else a bit annoyed that the media keeps saying Charlie altered his rotation so that the Big 3 faced Atlanta? I mean when I hear that a manager altered his rotation,to me it means guys went on short rest or there was a drastic change… as we know none of that happened.
not sure why it bothers me but it does….
While the media is overblowing this, the fact is that Manuel did do what he had to do (a little thing considering the off days, but still a change) to insure that the Big 3 would face Atlanta. Meanwhile, Bobby Cox did not use the off days over the last several weeks to insure that he could throw his best pitchers at the Phillies. This is a huge contrast, and one that paid dividends to the Phillies, so it makes a ton of sense that it is being a little overblown.
A slight change for the Mets
Mets are throwing Dickey Friday, Gee on Saturday, and Pat Misch on Sunday per mlb.com. Mets want to give Pelfrey an extra day rest.
All you will think about as your vision closes to a black pinpoint will be Brad Lidge surfing a non-deceptive fastball into somebody who is prepared to club it out into the seats.
Wait – I understand putting Misch ahead of BIG PELF if you want to give BIG PELF a rest, but what’s the point of flip-flopping Dickey and Gee?
Q: What do you call a knuckleball that has a little too much rotation?
A: Batting practice.
Good stuff from TC:
Let’s hope this is the beginning of their big swoon
and they lose the rest of their games this season (especially the last 3 against the Bravos.)
So we are going to come off a sweep of the Braves and suddenly tank the season? Talk about optimism.
I don’t know. I mean, was it really a “collapse” or just a bit of regression? Did the Mets play a bit over their heads in 2007?
Lex clavatoris designati rescindenda est.
Their bullpen in particular was mad, bad, and dangerous to know.
by Wet Luzinski on Sep 24, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
careful— regression means that they play according to their true abilities from that point forward, not that they play below them later on to average things out. the mets weren’t a 4 wins per 17 games kind of team in 2007. their regression should have been 9 wins per 17 instead of their previus pace of 10 or whatever.
by Matt Swartz on Sep 24, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions
All I want to see
is proper management of the starters the rest of the way. If I see Charlie putting Halladay in for another damn complete game against the Nationals, I will blow a gasket.
No more than 6 more innings total, for Halladay. If they clinch the division before the series with the Braves, don’t start ANY of the big three for that series, and instead rest the majority of the team and send the scrubs down to Atlanta. Seriously – field a team with backups for that series.
Do you remember what the Cubs did to Doc on incredibly long rest?
I don’t know that you go with an entirely scrub team against Atlanta for 2 reasons. Firstly, I am not so sure that Atlanta in the playoffs is an award winning idea. Although considering that the other option may be the Giants, your mileage may vary.
Further (and this is even something that Halladay said recently), overly long rest leads to rust- 5 or even 6 days is great, but much more knocks him (and possibly many pitchers) off of their game. A better idea may be to send all of them to Atlanta, and let each of them “start” on their assigned day. These starts would be minimal workloads- think 3-5 innings each and no more than 60-80 pitches each, allowing the pitchers to stay in rhythm while also giving them rest.
Dickey
I wonder what his contract situation is. He might be a surprising FA this winter.
"I remember being three and I wanted to be a baseball player, that's all I ever really wanted to be. That and Spider Man." -Raul Ibanez
by Jose and the Contrarians on Sep 23, 2010 7:52 PM EDT reply actions
Would that only be the case of a non-tender? I was under the impression that he is still under arb control by the Mets, but I could be wrong on this.
by WanderingMoses on Sep 23, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, arb eligible. I don’t think the Mets will non-tender him, although there’s a decent argument that maybe they should.
Probably cost and the fear that he will never have another season like this one.
by WanderingMoses on Sep 23, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Considering that offering him arbitration only locks them into giving him a one year contract, and the instability within their starting pitching rotation for next year (Santana likely to miss at least the beginning), what would be the harm in going to arbitration with him? Is the chance that he will get a big contract that big?
Yankees on way to losing means Phils tied for best MLB record
by Sept.28.Oct.27.Dec.28.2008 on Sep 23, 2010 9:50 PM EDT reply actions
So do most media outlets
by Sept.28.Oct.27.Dec.28.2008 on Sep 23, 2010 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Highest BABIP: No Misching the connection.
What’s this 10 – 0 stuff?
You have some sort of agenda?
Someone on Bleed Cubbie Blue (Where the Nomadic SBNation Wanderlusting Whore spent an uncomfortable hour or two today) mentioned that their MLB channel was giving them the Yankee game.
I said “Yeah, East Coast bias. Watch where the World Series ends up this year. Both teams.”
If you never ask, you'll never know.
But where's the integrity in saying you never knew if you never asked?
by victor frankenstein on Sep 24, 2010 1:41 AM EDT reply actions
Phils can clinch playoff spot tonight
…with one more win and one more loss by each of the Padres and Giants. This relies on the 3 game series that the Padres and Giants play to end the season, which will ensure that one of the teams will incur two additional losses.
i think you’re right!! i totally didn’t realize they were playing each other. i can’t believe this hasn’t been discussed more!
by Matt Swartz on Sep 24, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Wouldn't there
You’re right. If the “worst case scenario” for the Phillies were to happen after that, this is what it would look like:
Phillies lose 8 straight to end the season after winning tonight: Final record 93-69
Braves win out: Final record 95-67
Padres go 8-2 to end the season (lose tonight, win next 2 vs Reds, sweep Cubs, win 2/3 over Giants): Final record 93-69
Giants go 6-3 to end the season (lose tonight, win next 5, win 1/3 over Padres): Final record 92-70. (interchangeable with the Padres depending on what happens in that series)
Braves win the East, Padres (or Giants) win the West, Phillies as WC. Not like that’s a nice scenario mind you, but it’s always good to clinch.
(it works, whaddya know)
So, this would be the “other” magic number, which I guess is three to clinch a playoff spot. I seem to remember that being celebrated by some teams in the past.
by phillyinportland on Sep 24, 2010 5:41 PM EDT up reply actions
For the record
I dig this feature, TP. Gives a look and saves me from looking it up. And you said you weren’t a research assistant.

by 






























