Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Week In GIFs

Not much to quibble with here... and we're certainly far from the "OMG THE FARM SYSTEM IS BARREN!" hysteria that a lot of people are stirring up.

over 1 year ago Wholecamels_tiny WholeCamels 70 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

carrying on Cormican's point from the other thread

Sickels is pretty high on Biddle, but I don’t think he’s too high. Biddle showed a lot in short-season and 6’5" lefties are pretty remarkable.

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Jan 2, 2011 10:10 AM EST reply actions  

Gillies didnt even make it into the top 20. I probably would have put him 8th…

by philiafan14364 on Jan 2, 2011 10:31 AM EST reply actions  

I’m with you here, even with the general placement of Gillies, but it seems to be a difference in philosophy between us and Sickels as opposed to poor grading. If I was to guess, I think Sickels is looking to Gillies’ lost year as a pretty significant hurdle for him, especially given the ambiguous makeup issues in terms of the cocaine puff-up. I’m of the mindset that, while it’s unfortunate that Gillies is a year older without the added experience, that the “lost” year is just more of a break than anything.

That said, my more pessimistic side wants to believe Sickels, since he’s obviously more knowledgeable than I am, but I still think Gillies’ ability/promise ought to get the benefit of the doubt for now.

by Trev223 on Jan 2, 2011 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

 He really injuried his hamstring correct? For a speedy guy, this type of injury can be very debilitating Other than missing much of the season perhaps this is why Sickel’s isn’t giving him the benefit of the doubt.

by j reed on Jan 2, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m too lazy to look it up right now, but I vaguely recall that Sickels gave Gillies a relatively low grade last year as well. If so, he’s being consistent at least, and not necessarily putting too much emphasis on the drug thing or the injuries.

by taco pal on Jan 2, 2011 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

He had Gillies #8 last year:

Tyson Gillies, OF, Grade C+: Draws walks, steals bases with outstanding speed, good glove, fun to watch. Most of his power came at High Desert; Double-A production could raise him to a B- or even a B. Could rank as high as fifth if you want to value his polish over pure upside of Gose, Valle, and Santana.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jan 2, 2011 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Sickels daily affirmation is probably “all c and C+ guys are pretty much interchangable”. He may have moved him from C+ to C, which is fairly reasonable given the lost year. I’ll be interested to see what the write up is in his book.

by Cormican on Jan 2, 2011 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s fair, along with j reed’s injury note. Honestly, my guess vis Sickels is based more on the larger prospect narrative surrounding Gillies; if he was never really enthused, a drop off the list seems reasonable enough.

by Trev223 on Jan 3, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Looking again, I probably would have found a way to plop Schwimer somewhere toward the bottom of the top 20 at the expense of one of the Toolsy Toolsheds.

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Jan 2, 2011 11:16 AM EST reply actions  

Percy Garner’s a really interesting addition, especially considering he didn’t exactly light the world on fire in SS ball. I guess he counts as a toolshed, which shouldn’t pique my interest that much, but I was pretty excited about his signing after the draft.

by Trev223 on Jan 2, 2011 11:47 AM EST reply actions  

So Rizzotti’s fielding is that bad? Is he that slow to keep him from playing LF or RF field? If he is blocked as Sickel’s says he is worth packaging in a trade with KK for a RH bat?

by j reed on Jan 2, 2011 2:27 PM EST reply actions  

.990 FLD% at 1B across all levels, has 2 SB and 3 CS in his minor league career, and 6 triples in 1,595 PAs, all at the A+ level or lower. He’s got good plate discipline and slightly above average power, but is a “true” 1B or DH (he doesn’t have the foot speed to play outfield), and just isn’t quite enough offensively to be either of those positions at the MLB level. I’d put him at bench bat/AAA insurance player.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jan 2, 2011 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Sheesh, and the first comment in the thread is about the ‘09 Cliff Lee trade. We’re still going to be hearing people complain about this in 2050.

by taco pal on Jan 2, 2011 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

Man, a lot of those comments are a hoot. Suffice it to say that a significant proportion of the commenters seem to be very certain of things that they have no factual basis for being certain about. Not necessarily because they aren’t knowledgeable people (although I do question how much some of these guys actually know about second- and third-tier prospects on a team they don’t follow, beyond what they read on thebaseballcube five minutes before posting), but because evaluating prospects is inherently speculative.

I realize that baseball blog commenters talking out of their asses is not a rare phenomenon on the internet, but what seems to set prospect blogs apart is that this happens even on the smart blogs. In fact, it seems to be the entire point of the exercise.

by taco pal on Jan 2, 2011 3:59 PM EST reply actions  

Permit Me A Tangent

I find people like this with my younger brother. He doesn’t know who someone like Mike Trout is, but goddamn if he’s all about calling Dom Brown a huge bust right now (actual conversation I just had a few minutes ago). It seems prospect watching is seriously undervalued among bloggers as few people actually put the effort into it, and everyone seems to know everything based off a random aside in an article they read 8 months ago.

"I remember being three and I wanted to be a baseball player, that's all I ever really wanted to be. That and Spider Man." -Raul Ibanez

by Jose and the Contrarians on Jan 2, 2011 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

You see a lot of comments there along the lines of “I saw him play in person once…” I like Sickels and some guys know their teams well (Dougdirt has a really good feel for the Reds system, for example), but most of it is schmucks like me who only know enough to occasionally sound like idiots when talking about other teams prospects.

by Cormican on Jan 2, 2011 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Like any place, it depends on the commenter over there. A lot are pretty knowledgeable, even about the second-tier prospects in other systems, but plenty talk right out their ass. Personally, I think the key in amateur prospecting is to understand what you’re basing your opinions on, and not take too extreme a position unless you have a solid basis for that opinion.

by PhillyFriar on Jan 8, 2011 10:51 AM EST up reply actions  

I found this list pretty encouraging. My memory of Sickels’ past reviews of the Phils system (refreshed by a look at his list from a year ago) was that he liked one guy, thought about a half dozen more were okay, and dismissed everyone else. That he sees a solid half-dozen of our prospects as really promising is nice to read.

FWIW, I still have Gillies in the top ten. At the end of March last year some liked him better than Brown. The guy knows the strike zone, is fast as hell and is strong enough that pitchers can’t just try to blow it past him. To dismiss him as a prospect is to conclude that he’s just too much of a mess personally for his talent to win out; maybe that will prove to be the case, but I don’t think any of us knows remotely enough to draw that conclusion.

by dajafi on Jan 2, 2011 9:45 PM EST reply actions  

fair assessment

I think it’s way, way too early to sell out on any of the Cliff Lee Three.

http://www.thegoodphight.com

by WholeCamels on Jan 2, 2011 10:08 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Has anyone confirmed whether Aumont is getting moved to the pen this year, as the guy on, I think, BA reported? (I hope not. Too soon for this.)

by taco pal on Jan 2, 2011 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree its way too soon for this. I think people forget that he is just turning 22 years old.

by EJL on Jan 2, 2011 11:26 PM EST up reply actions  

The last I heard was in that BA chat, where Matt Forman relayed that that’s what he’d heard from Phillies officials.

I’m not entirely sure how I feel about this. On one hand, I do agree with the general premise that you shouldn’t move someone to the bullpen unless you have to. On the other, I wonder if Aumont has the chops to make it as a starter in the long run anyway. Ultimately I think I’d give him one more season in the rotation, then go bullpen in 2012. Either way, I really do like his chances as a power armed reliever.

by PhillyFriar on Jan 8, 2011 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Hey I remember him. He was the guy who used to pitch under an assumed name that was totally different from his real name.

by taco pal on Jan 3, 2011 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

By the way.. which current Phils pitcher threw 5.5 k/9 and 4.1 bb/9 at age 21 in AAA?

by EJL on Jan 2, 2011 11:29 PM EST reply actions  

That would be the ace of aces

by phatj on Jan 3, 2011 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

And he managed to put up a 3.79 ERA nevertheless

by phatj on Jan 3, 2011 1:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Nice. Here are the stats for all four aces at age 21.

Syracuse (INT, AAA): 9-5, 3.79 ERA, 21 G, 21 GS, 116.1 IP, 53 BB, 71 K, 11 HR
Clearwater/Reading: 4-0, 2.31 ERA, 6 G, 6 GS, 35.0 IP, 19 BB, 37 K, 2 HR
Cape Fear (SAL, Lo A): 1-4, 5.24 ERA, 11 G, 11 GS, 44.2 IP, 36 BB, 63 K, 1 HR
Michigan (MDW, Lo A): 13-4, 4.46 ERA, 22 G, 22 GS, 151.1 IP, 54 BB, 143 K, 8 HR

And their age 22 seasons.

Toronto (MLB): 8-7, 3.92 ERA, 36 G, 18 GS, 149.1 IP, 79 BB, 82 K, 19 HR
Lakewood/Clearwater/SWB: 3-1, 1.10 ERA, 8 G, 8 GS, 49.0 IP, 12 BB, 68 K, 1 HR
Jupiter (FSL, Hi A): 6-7, 2.79 ERA, 21 G, 20 GS, 109.2 IP, 46 BB, 129 K, 13 HR
Kissimee/Round Rock: 15-7, 2.21 ERA, 27 G, 26 GS, 175.0 IP, 33 BB, 188 K, 6 HR

by taco pal on Jan 3, 2011 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

aumont's age 21 season

Clearwater: 2-5, 4.48 ERA, 16 G, 10 GS, 72.1 IP, 42 BB, 77 K, 6 HR

Reading: 1-6, 7.43 ERA, 11 G, 11 GS, 49.2 IP, 38 BB, 38 K, 4 HR

by taco pal on Jan 3, 2011 10:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Aumont’’s a tall pitcher, so this guy may be helpful as a comparison. The Big Unit was in low-A ball at age 21.

by Wet Luzinski on Jan 3, 2011 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ve had a hard time finding a good comp for Aumont. Aumont has 2 things working against him: 1. his height, which can cause timing issues when pitching and 2. he’s a cold weather pitcher, meaning he spent less time pitching when younger than someone like Johnson or Chris Young who both grew up in Texas did. That means rough mechanics that he spent less time working to correct as a youth.

I’ve had a hard time finding an MLB player who is a comp for both of those.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 12:04 PM EST up reply actions  

What’s more, he grew up in extreme poverty and never even played baseball until he was around 14 years old.

by taco pal on Jan 4, 2011 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I just think the key is he’s way too young to give up on starting. Even Mariano Rivera was a starter until he was 25. Who knows what Aumont will be if/when he catches up.

by EJL on Jan 4, 2011 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think you guys are disagreeing.

by taco pal on Jan 4, 2011 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

We aren’t. But the lack of MLB comps has thrown up a bit more of a red flag for me. I hope he makes it because his ceiling is huge, but I worry it may be too many obstacles to overcome.

Of course, I could look at this as glass half full and say his relative inexperience may make it easier to fix his mechanics than Johnson or Young, since his bad habits aren’t as strongly ingrained.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s fair. Although I don’t think the main explanation for the absence of comps for Aumont is that the failure rate for Aumont-like pitchers is high. Instead I think the main explanation is that there just aren’t many people out there who are similar to Aumont to begin with. That is, there’s no success rate or failure rate at all – it’s just zero for zero. So it doesn’t raise a red flag for me so much as a giant question mark.

by taco pal on Jan 4, 2011 1:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Oops, I was agreeing with him :)

by EJL on Jan 4, 2011 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Whoa, so Rivera must have thrown something other than that friggin’ cutter at one point in his career.

by j reed on Jan 4, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

So does a cold weather pitcher means he hasn’t pitched year round? If so I see that as a plus. Many doctors believe year round baseball is one of the reasons behind the large number of Tommy John surgeries they see every year. Now it’s one thing to compete and then train in the off season as a year round affair and quite another to compete in a sport year round. The latter can lead to overuse injuries and chronic pain conditions.

by j reed on Jan 4, 2011 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think that’s right. I can definitely see how there would be both pros and cons.

In a way, calling Aumont a cold weather pitcher fails to adequately describe him. Jesse Biddle is considered a “cold weather pitcher” based on being from Philadelphia. Aumont is more like a frickin’ freezing weather pitcher. You probably can’t start the season in Gatineau Quebec until mid-May.

by taco pal on Jan 4, 2011 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

A bit of both. Less so that they can compete year round, but they can throw off a mound year round. Not necessarily at full effort or in a competitive environment, but they can get in work year round, as needed.

I agree on the injury/overuse concerns.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 2:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I finally found 1 usable comp

It’s not perfect, as he’s shorter than Aumont, but he crosses the tall pitcher threshold of 6’6" and he’s from a cold weather climate (Montreal). His numbers are not great and he hasn’t been a starter in 5 years, but I looked at every Canadian pitcher to have pitched in the Majors the last 10 years and every pitcher ever to have been born/raised in Alaska (Ola, Senor Schilling). And this was literally the only comp.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting. It does seem like he was a late bloomer, for what it’s worth. He started to improve a lot at age 23, which is also when he was moved to relief. He still hasn’t succeeded in the big leagues, but he probably also has a lower ceiling than Aumont, talent-wise, since he was only a 7th round pick.

by taco pal on Jan 4, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Throws a mid-90’s Fastball (per Fangraphs ~75% of the time), but has major control issues.

One report I found on him made him sound like a Joe Savery type. Rated higher than his draft slot, but coming off an arm injury (Tommy John), so he was selected lower than he was rated the year prior to the injury.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Speaking of Shilling, he was walking almost 4 batters per 9 at age 21 as well.

I’m curious if the decision to move him to the pen will be made by someone who is watching him and deciding his skills would be best suited for relieving, or if it is performance based.

Does anyone know how Aumont did the second and third time through the lineups compared to the first?

by EJL on Jan 4, 2011 8:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe he was learning new pitches?

by j reed on Jan 4, 2011 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

This is where baseball’s Nazism with respect to Minor League Splits really hurts.

by PhillyFriar on Jan 8, 2011 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

interesting that Halladay was such a highly regarded prospect despite not terribly impressive numbers. Halladay was Baseball America’s #12 prospect after posting those numbers at AAA.

21 is fairly young for AAA, and Halladay’s 3.79 ERA was pretty good for the league (8th among those with 100+ IP). but still, his K rate and walk rate were below the league average.

we all know Halladay pretty much totally reinvented himself after his horrible 2000 season, but it’s really striking how dramatic it was. his first 231 ML innings (through 2000), he struck out 5.4 and walked 4.8 per 9. his next 2,066 innings, he struck out 6.9 and walked 1.6.

by perfectdepth on Jan 3, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I realize that Sickels is a tough grader, but I’m still surprised to see De Fratus as a C+. He’s big, possesses a power arm and has posted an excellent walk rate and a respectable K/9 as a reliever. And as a 23 year old in AA, I don’t think he’s particularly old for his league.

by Delicious Cake on Jan 4, 2011 3:56 PM EST reply actions  

He isn’t old for his league, but as a reliever it’s tough to get anything higher than C+. There are extremely few high impact relievers in baseball that it’s tough to grade a pure relief prospect very highly. Frankly, C+ is a pretty good mark for a reliever, most guys he gives a straight C.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Someday which, admittedly for baseball is a geological measurement of time, the Scarlett R will be a fossil.

by j reed on Jan 4, 2011 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

In prospect rankings it makes sense, someone who’s upside is that he may play 4 or 5 innings a week, IMO, should be ranked below a potential everyday player or a Starter who may get to 200 innings a year.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 9:12 PM EST up reply actions  

In non-Phillies prospecting news, the Texas Rangers just signed a Venezuelan shortstop by the name of Rougned Odor. Awesome.

http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=10736

by taco pal on Jan 4, 2011 7:06 PM EST reply actions  

That’s not enough half as good as Marlins prospect Sequoyah Trueblood Stonecipher

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to poo-poo Odor, that would be almost as cool as having a jersey with Satan on the back.

by Cormican on Jan 4, 2011 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I went to a Pens game once when he was there, and strongly considered (but ultimately decided against) picking up one of his jerseys at the team store.

by taco pal on Jan 4, 2011 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

So a native american or just hippie parents? I had to find out.

by j reed on Jan 4, 2011 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Outstanding stuff. But if he becomes a Brave I’ll vomit.

by Wet Luzinski on Jan 4, 2011 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

So would his family I venture.

Aristotle was not Belgian, the principle of Buddhism is not "every man for himself", and the London Underground is not a political movement.

by doubleh on Jan 5, 2011 1:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Have Atlanta (or Cleveland) had a Native American player in recent times?

I know Kyle Lohse and Jacoby Ellsbury are at least part-NA, but neither of them has played for those teams.

by taco pal on Jan 5, 2011 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t realize they were part-NA (or Joba Chamberlain, for that matter). Looks like the last was Jack Aker, a pitcher on the 1974 Braves for part of the season. Link here.

by schmenkman on Jan 5, 2011 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

What would be even cooler would be to get a Stonecipher jersey for you, and a Graham Stoneburner jersey for the missus.

Honor is no substitute for victory.

by The Dark on Jan 5, 2011 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

 Well the nickname potenial is limitless

by j reed on Jan 4, 2011 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Late to the party here...

…thanks to a busted Internet connection at home and a hellish week at work, but I have to say, I always eagerly await Sickels’ list. Now excuse me while I sprinkle my comments throughout the thread (which had some pretty good discussion, I should say)…

by PhillyFriar on Jan 8, 2011 10:45 AM EST reply actions  

I was wondering why you weren’t all over this post. Welcome back.

by EJL on Jan 9, 2011 12:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.

Next Game

Philadelphia Phillies
@ St. Louis Cardinals

Friday, May 25, 2012, 8:15 PM EDT
Busch Stadium

Cliff Lee vs Kyle Lohse

Clear. Winds blowing from right to left field at 5-15 m.p.h. Game time temperature around 90.

Complete Coverage >

Yahoo_full_count

Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

Tecumseh_phillies_small FuquaManuel

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Phillyfriar__new2__small PhillyFriar

Associate Blog Lords

Bugs_small taco pal

Greg_luzinski_small Wet Luzinski

-20100715-hamels_avatar_for_rtp_small RememberthePhitans

Phillies1980logo_small schmenkman

Lion_small philsandthrills

Madmen_icon_small lizroscher

Contributors

Ryanred_small petzrawr

Werein_small Phrozen

Trader-joes_small Joecatz

Small Dash Treyhorn

Blogger Emeritus

Colevatar_small Matt Swartz