The Phillies should go after Mark Reynolds
What can Mark Reynolds offer the Phillies?
First of all, he can guard the hot corner—not well, posting a career UZR of -19, dWAR of -0.8 and a RF/9 of 2.44 at 3B—but he could fill in well enough to allow Placido Polanco to cover 2B. When Chase Utley’s zombie corpse is successfully reanimated by team physician Jobu, Reynolds can cycle through the outer infield and corner outfield positions giving the regulars time off, as well as being another long-term option in RF. In the meantime, this will allow Wilson Valdez to stick to being a utility player,
Defense aside, Reynolds’ main contribution will be with the bat. Aside from striking out once in a while (he’s the only man ever to strikeout 200 times in a season, and he’s done it three times), he hits the ball a ton. Over the last four seasons, he’s hit 121 HRs with an OPS of .817. Add to that 99 doubles and 26 net steals, and his oWAR adds up to 8.8 (or 9.1 from Fangraphs). Plus, as a righthander, he’ll fit in well with the Phillies’ decidedly left-of-center lineup.
If he can produce 2+ WAR a season, his salary of $12.5M over the next two years will be a reasonable bargain. The $11M team option in 2013 probably won’t be a bargain, but it’s against a $500K buyout.
So how to get him?
The obvious choice may be to offer Joe Blanton as the centerpiece of any trade, and he would be a good fit for the Orioles, whose opening day starter is likely to be Jeremy Guthrie. They’re a rebuilding team, however, so they would likely want a prospect as well, in addition to cash to keep salary down. Since any deal needs to make sense for both teams, obviously, the O's will need to throw in something as well. With that in mind, I’d like to propose the following trade: The Phillies send Joe Blanton, $4.5M, Cody Overbeck and possibly Freddy Galvis to the Orioles in exchange for Mark Reynolds and Chris Tillman.
This does several things. First, it fills the hole at 2B with Gold Glove caliber defense: Polanco. Second, it returns a RH power bat to the lineup who, despite the strikeouts, contributes ~2 WAR a year. Third, it gives Cholly a long-term option for a solid utility player upon Utley’s return. Fourth, it moves the team’s average age in the right direction. Finally, Tillman is a 22-year-old "prospect" (he has 118.2 ML innings) with a plus mid-90s fastball, a good curve and who threw a no-no at AAA.
For the Orioles, they get a solid, established Major League starter, who, in their rotation should slot in at No. 2, for a net zero change in salary. They get an outstanding defensive prospect in Galvis, who should be ready in a year or two, and a solid hitting prospect in Overbeck who hit 25 HRs at Clearwater and Reading last year.
To me, this trade makes sense. The Phillies, presently, are blessed with dominant starting pitching, but injuries and regression see to make their offense less fearsome than in prior years. They are thus in a position to move an asset like Blanton, who, while clearly not a bad pitcher, is not on the same level as Halladay et al. If Blanton’s spot in the rotation is filled by Worley or Kendrick and Utley is replaced, temporarily, by Reynolds, then you’ve avoided the steeper dropoff between Utley and Valdez.
With other rising stars around the NL East, especially Jason Heyward in Atlanta, the Phillies need to capitalize on their offensive position. Adding a bat like Reynolds is a big step in the right direction. Blanton is obviously an integral part of the pitching staff, and his contributions during the 2008 championship season cannot be ignored or forgotten. However, the Phillies need to replace Utley’s bat somehow, and, to me, this is a better option than playing Valdez full time.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Galvis shoudnt even be in AA, let alone the majors.
by philiafan14364 on Mar 21, 2011 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t see how this would improve the team, nor how it would get done.
by philsandthrills on Mar 19, 2011 6:08 PM EDT reply actions
Blanton every 5th day + Valdez every day + Galvis next year or later + Overbeck in two+ years < Worley / Kendrick every 5th day + Reynolds every day + Valdez as utility + Tillman next year or later
The Phils need to replace Utley’s bat for however long he’s going to be out. They need to replace Werth’s righthanded bat. This gets it done for essentially a net zero change in salary.
This also helps the O’s. They’re not going to be contenders this year—they know that. A couple young prospects and an everyday starter help them more in the long run than Reynolds.
i think you are undervaluing tillman a bit. i don’t think they’d be willing to give up on him yet that easily
I have not liked Tillman’s numbers. I recall, briefly, looking at his K/BB numbers last year and not being terribly impressed.
Why look'st thou so?' -"With my crossbow
I shot the Albatross."
by RememberthePhitans on Mar 22, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions
worth noting that
Valdez accumulated more WAR (1.7) than Reynolds (0.8) last year—in fewer PA.
I’m not so sure Reynolds is the answer to anything for the Phillies. even assuming that he can handle the outfield is a bit optimistic too, since he’s only played a handful of 2006 minor league games and a couple innings in 2007 there.
True, although Valdez had essentially a career year, with highs in virtually every offensive category, while Reynolds had a down season. Plus, Fangraphs gives Reynolds the edge, with 2.4 WAR to Valdez’s 0.9.
Valdez is undoubtedly a better fielder, and if the Phils had resigned or replaced Werth’s RH bat, this wouldn’t make any sense, but needing a righthander, I think, makes this a worthwhile trade.
It’s all opinions, though. That’s why (among other reasons) I’m not a GM.
Righthanded vs. Lefthanded doesn’t matter much unless Reynolds has a strong split. Howard and Ibanez would still end up facing lefties otherwise, as it’d be more advantageous to have Reynolds and Howard face a lefty than have Reynolds and Howard face a righty.
Beyond that, obviously, Reynolds would not play full time here, and thus any WAR he would normally get would be significantly reduced. It’s unlikely that he’d play even as much as Valdez did last year. I’d imagine 1.5 WAR or so would be around the max he could provide in that role, and that’s giving being a bit gracious to him. He is by no means a “big bat”, especially given his low OBP, which has alternated between .320 and .349 the last four years. Last year, he was below average offensively, with an OPS+ of 98.
Thus, I really doubt he’s worth $5 million and Joe Blanton. He’s due $12.5M over the next two years, so he isn’t exactly cheap either.
Now, as to the feasibility of such a trade, it would effectively leave the Orioles with no third baseman. They have a few people who could play there, but not particularly well. Beyond that, Chris Tillman is probably worth a good deal more than Overbeck and Galvis, who are mediocre prospects at best, and are unlikely to even play in the majors. This trade just doesn’t make much sense from their standpoint.
So as I said, it doesn’t help the team get better, nor is it even doable.
by philsandthrills on Mar 20, 2011 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Love the creativity here, Phrozen, and there’s definite logic to acquiring Reynolds. That said, even if the rumored Castillo signing doesn’t happen, there’s no way I see the O’s doing this.
MacPhail got Reynolds on the cheap, and I have to think it’s with the idea of spinning him at a trade deadline after a bounce back. There’s simply no reason for them to give him up at the current time. As for Tillman… as I said above, I’ve never been a big believer, but he’s still young and has #2/3 starter potential if all breaks right, so they have no incentive to give him up at the current time. Pretty solid shot, in my mind, that he winds up in the bullpen, and they haven’t handled him terribly well, but he won’t be a chuck in to any trade they do in the immediate future.
Yep, he’s 1st (223 in 2009), 2nd (211-2010), and 3rd (204-2008) on the all time single-season list, and the only guy to ever strike out 200 times in a season.
But for those like myself who believe that in the vast majority of situations, an out is an out and therefore the number of K’s isn’t that important, the problem with Reynolds is that he’s just not that good a hitter:
career BA/OBP/SLG of .242/.334/.483
OPS .817, OPS+ 108
All of those numbers were worse in 2010: .198/.320/.433 (.753 OPS, 98 OPS+)
He’s also another guy who may not be as good once you take him out of the friendly confines of Chase Field: career OPS of .852 at home, .784 on the road.
Two bright spots, as I see them:
- he’s still 27, so there is a chance he could bounce back from 2010 and repeat 2009 (.892 OPS, 127 OPS+)
- his Walk rate has gone up every year, and if he can combine that with batting averages in the .260+ range, and 30+ HRs, he could be quite useful
I agree with you, for the most part.
I’m not looking to Reynolds to be an equal to Werth, but as someone who could fill in one of the holes in our lineup and provide a decent RH power bat. He won’t be an All Star, an MVP or Silver Slugger, obviously, but he can contribute more than Josh Barfield, say.
Plus, as you say, he’s on the right side of 30.
You’ve got to give a better estimation of where you value Reynolds than Barfield<Reynolds<Werth. That’s a pretty damn big range right there.
by philsandthrills on Mar 21, 2011 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions
I do like Mark Reynolds, and think he would be a great fit in the 5th hole, but I also think with the amount of strikeouts that Reynolds would put up & the price we’d have to pay for him in prospects, it’s really not worth it. It’s also not completely certain that Utley will gone for the entire season. I do however think another bench/infield/utility player could be attained for a much lesser price than Reynolds. Now they wouldn’t put up the run production #’s that Reynolds would, but someone like Wilson Betemit, Kevin Kouzmanoff or Jorge Cantu could impact the lineup.
While I’m not sure if Reynolds is the guy, the idea of looking for 3rd basemen is a good one with Polanco’s ability to play second and that there’s typically more offensive depth in that position. The perfect guy would have been Eric Chavez – someone who can’t play everyday for an entire season, an ex-premiere player looking for a way to leave the game but with a chance to win a title, a player who still can flash the glove and comes with pop.
Joe Crede signed a minor league deal with Colorado but didn’t report to camp; he might have been worth a look.
by perfectdepth on Mar 22, 2011 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
A Google search came up empty, merely saying that he chose not to report and may retire instead, but suggested that back problems may have been the reason.
by dannijd on Mar 22, 2011 7:56 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions

by 































