Brownout: or, the Phillies' "Rookie Problem"
Black humor nods to the baseball gods aside, it’s way, way too early to give up on Domonic Brown, unless his hand fracture somehow leads to an amputation. What we can say for sure, though, is that the team’s consensus top prospect won’t be in the Opening Day lineup, and it’s probably now less than even odds he’ll take the majority of at-bats in right field for the Phillies this year. Thus will continue a surprising and increasingly concerning multi-year streak in which no Phils rookie has seen serious time in the team’s regular lineup.
It’s one thing to be the oldest team in the game, as the Phils are; it’s another simply to get out of the habit of breaking in new talent. The 2010 club featured only one regular under age 30—Shane Victorino, age 29—and no rookie who got more plate appearances than Brown’s 70. That was actually the biggest number in three years; John Mayberry Jr. led the 2009 team with 60 plate appearances, and the top positional rookie on the 2008 World Champs was the immortal Mike Cervenak, a 31 year old who recorded the only 13 plate appearances of his career to date that September.
We have to go back to 2007 to find the last two Phillies rookies who came to the plate more than 100 times. Carlos Ruiz, who had made a cameo late in 2006, became the more or less regular catcher that season once the team got past its weird fixation with Rod Barajas, making 429 plate appearances. And reserve outfielder Michael Bourn made 133 plate appearances in addition to frequent pinch-running and defensive substitution duties. Ruiz was 28 that season, and Bourn was traded in the Brad Lidge deal that winter.
(The situation has been a bit better on the pitching side, but not much. J.A. Happ was the Rookie of the Year runner-up in 2009, but at 26 he was a pretty old rookie as well, and a year later the team traded him for Roy Oswalt. Antonio Bastardo still hasn’t quite cemented his status as a big-leaguer, and Scott Mathieson seems stuck in quad-A purgatory. This might shake out next year as Justin De Fratus, Michael Schwimer, Michael Stutes and others start to push their way into the bullpen picture, but for now the pitchers are about as old as the hitters.)
Of course, the biggest reason no rookie has cracked the Phillies’ lineup in four years is because previous generations of young talent—starting with Jimmy Rollins in 2001 and concluding with Victorino (who wasn’t homegrown, but finished his minor-league apprenticeship with the Phils) in 2006 and Ruiz in 2007, have been so good and, at least until 2010, so durable. That said, in building its Rotation of Doom, the team has traded away a few position players who might have found playing time, including infielders Adrian Cardenas and Jason Donald and outfielder Michael Taylor. (Cardenas and Taylor, both now with the Athletics, have yet to make their major league debuts, but it’s not a stretch to imagine that one or both would have shown up with the injury-ravaged 2010 Phillies had they not been dealt.)
Where the dearth of usable young talent really has shown up is on the balance sheet. The Phillies are now the second-most expensive team in the game—as generally is the case when you’re paying guys with accumulated service time. I’m not shedding a tear for the strain on the Phillies’ books; they obviously have it to spend. But with a year left on Raul Ibanez’s contract, it would be nice if Brown—or Tyson Gillies, or someone—were ready by next spring; the pending decision on Jimmy Rollins likewise would be easier if Freddy Galvis could hit.
While the Phillies are the oldest team in the bigs by average age, it’s not quite fair to call them an "old" team: most of the stars are at the end of their prime years, with Rollins, Ruiz and Chase Utley all 32, Ryan Howard 31, and Victorino 30. Roy Halladay, Cliff Lee, and Oswalt all will turn 33 or 34 this season, as will Lidge. There’s Ibanez (soon to be 39) and Jose Contreras (God only knows), but having two guys on the far side of 35 for a contender isn’t unusual.
The problem is that the longer a team goes without replenishing their talent pool from within, the harder and more disruptive it becomes to do so. Beyond Brown, and assuming that Gillies and Phillippe Aumont don’t recapture their top-prospect form, the next bunch of really exciting Phils farmhands are at least two or three years away; if reinforcements aren’t found in the meantime, by the time they get there, the glory days of 2007-10 might be obscured by a few very expensive, very disappointing campaigns. Get well soon, Dom.
35 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m not sure how to feel about this. Will I be miserable in 2013 & 2014 if our regulars are too old to help out our pitching staff or do I bask in the success of the past four years and rewatch Lidge’s strikeout of Hinske.
I guess this year and next year especially will determine how things turn out. The King of Pop(outs) JRoll is a prime example. Need Galvis to step up this year and if not we might have to say goodbye to Colvin Cosart or someone of that studlike pedigree. Hope not but stranger things have happened. I just know that I am excited for this regular season. And to watch Domonic Brown in LV. Not really but I have season tickets to Iron Pigs.
by Pedro45 on Mar 9, 2011 8:36 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Rollins had 2.3 WAR in 54% of a season last year. Certain aspects of his game are frustrating, but it’s amazing how quickly he’s become underappreciated in this town. Even with how poorly he hit last year, he was still a valuable player, and he may yet bounce back at the plate.
Rollins and Utley are the two veterans that the Phillies should most want to keep. For a while there in the ’90s and ’00s, there were a lot of great middle infielders all over MLB, but today it looks like baseball is sinking back into the situation it was in during the ’80s, when hardly any teams ever had a shortstop who could hit. Not only is Galvis unlikely to turn into one, but look around all of minor league baseball: there are hardly any shortstops coming up for any team. Rollins is going to be one of the most impossible guys on the team to replace.
Outfield and pitching prospects, meanwhile, are plentiful, both in the Phillies system and around baseball. For the next five years, the strategy needs to be to phase in as much cost-controlled talent as possible at those positions so that money can be spent in the infield.
So much this. I think it’s awfully strange that I find myself defending Rollins so much to people that just want to let him walk. This is a guy who put up a freaking 6.1 WAR MVP year in 2007 at shortstop. Even if he’s in decline, there aren’t a whole lot of shortstops who have the potential to give you the value that he does, and even fewer that are going to be free agents.
Hey, lookit that! Brian Schneider with a three-run bomb!
Training for the Phillies 5K Run on March 26th. Hoping I don't embarrass myself :-)
by LeepinLizardz on Mar 9, 2011 1:41 PM EST up reply actions
Here’s an unofficial one I just made.
Training for the Phillies 5K Run on March 26th. Hoping I don't embarrass myself :-)
by LeepinLizardz on Mar 9, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
Help!
My husband thinks Michael Young is a good trade. I’ve tried talking stats. He won’t hear of it. How can I convince him he is not a good value?
Aristotle was not Belgian, the principle of Buddhism is not "every man for himself", and the London Underground is not a political movement.
Tell him Young is old and a clubhouse cancer, since he asked for a trade. The second part isn’t true, but it should be good enough.
Training for the Phillies 5K Run on March 26th. Hoping I don't embarrass myself :-)
by LeepinLizardz on Mar 9, 2011 2:04 PM EST up reply actions
1) He’s not as good as he seems, and 2) he’s very expensive
1) He’s one of those hitters who’s helped by the traditional stats.
- He’s only had two seasons with OPS over .836: 2005 (.899), and 2009 (.892); career OPS is only .795
- .300 career average, but he doesn’t walk much, so in the end he doesn’t get on base very much.
- He gets lots of doubles and RBIs, but he uses a lot of outs to do it
- He was never a great fielder
- As bad as all that sounds, it’s in spite of being helped tremendously by his home park: .859 career OPS at home, ,733 career OPS on the road
- And of course, before your husband says he’ll just be moving from one good hitter’s park to another, Arlington has boosted scoring 11% in the past 3 years (4th in MLB). CBP has only boosted scoring 1.5% (12th in MLB).
2) Very expensive: he’s owed $16 MILLION per year for 2011-2013
I wrote this piece Sunday night and didn’t have it post until today because the site had so much other good stuff in the queue (a problem we couldn’t have imagined three or four years ago). Meanwhile, Conlin published this article yesterday, which makes a similar argument but looks ahead rather than behind.
(Well, other than taking shots at Joe Savery, Anthony Hewitt and other bust picks over the last few years. To be fair, it definitely occurred to me that if the Phils had made wiser choices in the first round of the 2007 and 2008 drafts, their situation might look better in terms of breaking in young talent. But as we’ve written here before, it’s kind of insane to complain about that given how big they hit on virtually every top draft pick between 1998 and 2002. And it’s not like they didn’t get anything out of those drafts; rather that some good picks were traded to build the Rotation of Doom, and other guys are hopefully still on the way, e.g. Jarred Cosart.)
And, the Phour Aces are projected to have a short shelf life. By 2014, which is 2 years past the Mayan-calendar end of time, Cliff Lee and Joe Blanton will be adios. Roy Halladay, Cole Hamels and Roy Oswalt will be joined by righthanders Brody Colvin and Jarred Cosart.
I think he has a typo going on there. Is he suggesting that in 2014 we will resign Oswalt and will have traded Lee (again)?
Roy Halladay, Cole Hamels, Cliff Lee, Brody Colvin, Jarred Cosart.
YES PLEASE
Training for the Phillies 5K Run on March 26th. Hoping I don't embarrass myself :-)
by LeepinLizardz on Mar 9, 2011 3:28 PM EST up reply actions
I would also note that lumping Biddle in with reputed busts Savery, Hewitt and Collier is extremely unfair to a guy drafted 9 months ago.
Wait, Biddle’s a bust? How’s that?
Training for the Phillies 5K Run on March 26th. Hoping I don't embarrass myself :-)
by LeepinLizardz on Mar 9, 2011 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
2013
How would you feel about a team constructed like this? (This assumes that all minor league prospects move up exactly one level per year.)
C – Ruiz (option year, age 34)
1B – Howard (age 33)
2B – Utley (age 34)
3B – Free agent TBNL
SS – Rollins on extension? (age 34)
LF – Francisco (third arb year, age 31)
CF – Gillies (age 25)
RF – Brown (age 25)
SP1 – Halladay (age 36)
SP2 – Lee (age 34)
SP3 – Hamels on extension? (age 29)
SP4&5 – Worley, Ramirez, Hyatt, Kendrick, other?
CL – Madson on extension? (age 32)
All other RPs are young guys under team control
2014
Or this:
C – Valle (rookie, age 23)
1B – Howard (age 34)
2B – Utley on extension? (age 35)
3B – FA TBNL
SS – Rollins on extension? (age 35)
LF/CF – Singleton (age 22), Gillies (age 26), James (age 25)
RF – Brown (age 25)
SP1 – Halladay (option year, age 37)
SP2 – Lee (age 35)
SP3 – Hamels on extension? (age 30)
SP4&5 – Cosart, Colvin, May, Worley, Ramirez, Hyatt, other?
CL – Madson on extension? (age 33)
All other RPs are young guys under team control
Yeah, but I’m assuming one level per year. Just seemed like the best middle-of-the-road assumption. Assume everyone makes it but nobody makes it fast.
You have to pay to access the philly.com archives and I’m not about to do that, but this type of Conlin article has a long, old pedigree. Here’s one I’d like to read again today, just from the headline and blurb.
“Is Hamels (gulp) on Wright track?” May 25, 2006 (First Line: “AT FIRST I thought it was the crack of a breaking bat. Maybe hot Phillies pitching prospect Jim Wright had jammed a hitter with his heavy, riding fastball and sawed him off.”)
I also have a reasonably clear recollection that Conlin also wrote a number of columns circa 2006 that were overly critical of Gavin Floyd and his chances to become a good major league pitcher. (Then in 2008 he criticized the Phillies for having traded Floyd.)
Basically, the guy doesn’t know squat about player development. He just likes to look up prospects’ names in his media guide and bloviate on them just to make himself seem as if he’s actually in the know.
I guess that Hamels column was probably more of a parallel to the one he wrote about Dom Brown a week or two ago, where he equated him with the guy who never made it in the majors because he got beaned.

by 

































