Polanco'd! (or, What Really Happened to the Phillies Offense)
Even when the Phillies offense was THE PHILLIES OFFENSE, you got the sense it wasn’t quite good enough for Charlie Manuel. Just about every season, the team turned in a collective batting average around .260, middle of the pack in the National League; the next spring, Manuel would express perplexity at his hitters’ low batting averages and suggest that he expected to find a .300 hitter or two in his lineup as the season got underway.
The 2011 Phillies do have a .300 hitter in their midst: Placido Polanco, at .309. But few fans would suggest that Polly is the best hitter on the team; the average is pretty, but doesn’t draw walks or drive the ball out of the park. At most, he’s the beacon of relative consistency to which we’re orienting ourselves while waiting for the real big bats—Ryan Howard, Chase Utley, maybe Jimmy Rollins, Raul Ibanez if he can reverse time or Domonic Brown if he can speed it up—to generate enough offense to support a historically great pitching staff.
The problem is that the Phillies, collectively, have become Polanco: certainly compared to what they did just two or three years ago, they produce relatively little offense that doesn’t show up in batting average. Making matters worse, they’re hitting .247 as a team.
One way to quantify what’s happened to the Phillies offense is to track what we might call "Isolated OPS" (IsOPS)—on-base percentage plus slugging percentage when batting average is removed from each. This is fairly close to the concept of Secondary Average, though that also captures net steals (stolen bases minus caught stealing), and frankly I don’t want to bother trying to figure it out for the whole team. (That said, we should note in passing that the Phils' efficacy on the base paths didn't leave town with Davey Lopes: as a team, they're a shiny 44 of 52 on steal attempts.) The Phillies’ team numbers for IsOPS over the last five seasons—since they emerged as the class of the NL East—are as follows: .264, .260, .267, .225, .197.
(Importantly, the 2007 number should be seen in the context of the team’s .274 batting average that season; the whole club batted .274/.354/.458 for an .812 OPS, which is higher than every Phillies regular in 2011 other than Shane Victorino. Lest you think back too fondly to ’07, though, remember that Kyle Kendrick started Game 2 of the Division Series that year.)
Being nerdly types who kinda really do think a walk is almost as good as a hit, we around here tend to bemoan the diminished quality of Phillies at-bats. And it’s true that many of the walking fools of lineups past—Pat Burrell and Jayson Werth above all—have moved on. But the Isolated OBP (OBP minus batting average) of recent Phillies teams has seen a rather gentle decline, from .080 in 2007 to .077, .076, .072 and .073 in the seasons since then. (To give Polanco his due, his walk rate is sharply up this season: 7.8 of his plate appearances, compared to 5.3 last year. Same with Ben Francisco, who’s walked in 12.8 of his plate appearances—about 50 percent above his career rate.)
No, the problem is the power. There are many ways to capture this, but here’s one stark example: in both 2007 and 2009, five Philies topped 20 home runs. In 2008, the number was four (and ten had at least 9). Last year? Howard had 31, Werth had 27, three others (Victorino, Ibanez, Utley) had at least 16. In 2011, Howard is on pace to hit 32, Ibanez for 20, and that’s it. The Philies are tied for 9th in the NL with 52 home runs, 24 behind the Brewers and Diamondbacks.
The team’s best IsOPS performer is also arguably the biggest culprit in the dropoff over the last few years: Ryan Howard. His IsOPS in 2007 was .440; in the years since, it’s been .380, .373, .306, and .316. Polanco’s .130 is nothing to write home about… unless you’re Ross Gload, whose 11 singles and one walk in 41 plate appearances give him an IsOPS of .018. Chase Utley is at a more than respectable .258; likewise Victorino at .285 and Francisco at .270.
If there’s real reason for optimism here, it’s that a lot of these guys have shown themselves to be better hitters in the second half. It’s true for Howard above all—he’s a career .261/.342/.524 guy before the all-star break, compared to .295/.401/.616 after—but Rollins adds 67 points after the break, Ruiz 120 (!), Polanco himself 24, Ibanez 20. Their staying true to form won't bring back Werth or Burrell, but would go a long way toward reasserting the Phillies offense as a force, if not on par with the relentless attack of yesteryear, something good enough that the ace du jour usually need not throw a shutout to win.
20 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Do they ever show stats by a time period, like 15 or 30 days? The idea would be to show who is hitting well recently, and not fighting back from an early slump or being carried by an early streak.
It's in his wheelhouse!!
Carlos Ruiz, My Nickname is Chooch.
Our Pal schmenkman’s “”http://www.thegoodphight.com/2011/5/17/2170283/phillies-weekend-links-may-14-2011" >Lucky vs Hittin’ Real Good" charts have been helpful in this regard.
by Wet Luzinski on Jun 14, 2011 5:27 AM EDT up reply actions
FanGraphs has this — link.
This shows the last 14 days. You can also change the Split to only show the last 30 or last 7.
Celebrating 51 years of slightly more Phils wins than losses: 1961-2011
Baseball reference
Shows for the season last 7 days, last 14 days, last 28 days, and last 365 days In their splits section.
by Joecatz on Jun 14, 2011 7:42 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Lack of contact
I’m wondering how the Phillies’ strikeout rates for hitters compare to the rest of the league and/or to past Phillies lineups. It seems possible that the lack of power would be exacerbated if it went along with putting less balls in play. Nobody aims for “productive outs,” but the sequence single, groundout that advances the baserunner to second, pop up, single, fly out yields a run where the sequence, single, strikeout, strikeout, single, fly out yields only gnashed teeth. Typically the players with the most power strike out the most and that’s a tradeoff you can live with as power is a more efficient way of advancing baserunners, but if guys who primarily hit singles strike out, their ability to advance runners is sseverely compromised.
Phillies strike out the least in the NL
They have the lowest strikeout rate: link (sort by k%)
Celebrating 51 years of slightly more Phils wins than losses: 1961-2011
One other thing to note at the above link, is if you look at the Batted Ball data, the Phillies have the 5th highest line drive rate, but the lowest BABIP.
That indicates they’ve been unlucky, and is another encouraging sign.
Celebrating 51 years of slightly more Phils wins than losses: 1961-2011
According to B-R, they are 2nd in the NL
B-R calculates K% as % of all plate appearances, which is (I think) the more accurate way to do it, and in that measure, the Phillies are 2nd in the NL.
Celebrating 51 years of slightly more Phils wins than losses: 1961-2011
on the other hand, despite their low strikeout rate, the Phillies are second-to-last in the NL in advancing a runner on second with no outs (51% success rate; 55% is league average) and second-to-last in scoring a runner from third with fewer than two outs (47% vs. 51% average).
interesting statistical quirk related to scoring a runner from third with fewer than two outs: the four worst teams in the NL are our NL East friends the Mets (48%), Marlins (48%), Phillies, and Braves (43%). Atlanta and Florida also place in the bottom four in advancing a runner from second with none out.
now I have no idea how much this reflects luck and how much is actually skill. FWIW, in 2010, the Phillies were tied for worst in the league in scoring runners from third with fewer than two outs (48%) but fourth best in advancing runners from second with none out (57%).
by perfectdepth on Jun 14, 2011 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions
more rambling data
on the other other hand, the Phillies are squarely league average (33%) in “productive outs” (a statistic which, of course, does not have a great correlation with scoring runs—the Nats lead the league with a 41% success rate and the Padres are second at 38%; those teams are scoring 3.71 and 3.34 R/G respectively).
the biggest offender in not scoring runners from third is, predictably, a pitcher—Halladay is 0/5. Howard, despite his strikeout rate, is actually very good at getting the runner in from third; he’s 12/21, which is an above-average 57% success rate. Polanco is best at 14/19 (74%). the worst position player with at least 10 opportunities is Francisco (6/18); Utley is 0/4.
the worst hitter in advancing the runner from second, however, is contact hitter extraordinaire Polanco (4/12), while GIDP machine Valdez is sitting pretty at 8/10. Francisco is probably the goat here at 0/5.
I think the real conclusion to draw from all this is that there isn’t much of a conclusion to draw. a lack of “productive outs” isn’t this team’s problem, and even if it was, stocking up on slap hitters like Polanco isn’t a cure. also, Ben Francisco is really having a rough year in just about everything except for drawing walks. hopefully some BABIP normalization will go a long way toward remedying that.
by perfectdepth on Jun 14, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
great comment
rec’d for luv
http://www.thegoodphight.com
by WholeCamels on Jun 14, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Interesting
I’m surprised they’re that low. I would have guessed middle of the pack somewhere. So I guess the lack of power really is the prime culprit all by itself. Thanks for the information.
No argument here
No, the problem is the power. There are many ways to capture this
Aaannnnddd…one of those ways is in a recent fanpost. :-))
Rec’d for great use of stats (mine were pretty crude) but our conclusions are pretty much the same.
This is my Cerberus .sig, while the regular one is on the DL.
Where’s Pete Rose when you really need him?
by phillyinportland on Jun 14, 2011 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
































