The Split Personality Pitcher

And the mystery pitcher is . . . - Steve Mitchell-USA TODAY Sports

Who am I?

I always enjoy the mystery player A/player B game, so let's have at it. Here are two pitchers. See if you can figure out who they are:

Pitcher A 169.33 5.74 1.56 0.308 0.365 0.468 0.833 0.339
Pitcher B 172 2.93 1.12 0.231 0.280 0.365 0.645 0.256

Both pitchers are just under a complete season for a starting pitcher, but with wildly different stats. Pitcher A would be lucky to hang on as a fifth starter for most teams, while pitcher B would be an ace on two-thirds of major league teams.

So who are these two pitchers? A hint before I reveal - they're actually the same pitcher over the course of 2012 and 2013. Broken down as we usually look at pitchers, by year, the pitcher's stats look like this:

2012 159.3 3.90 1.27 0.254 0.315 0.416 0.731 0.278
2013 182 4.70 1.40 0.285 0.331 0.420 0.751 0.306

But, instead of breaking up the pitcher's stats by the two calendar years, I've broken them up roughly as follows: pitcher A is the player for the first half of 2012 and the second half of 2013, whereas pitcher B is the player for the second half of 2012 and first half of 2013.

Looked at this way, the player was two completely different pitchers for long stretches of time. For the two book-end halves, the pitcher was horrible; in between, he was dominant. What's strange about this is that the pitcher didn't just show dominance or ineptitude off and on throughout both seasons, but rather showed both for long stretches of time.

Which raises the real question here - what was Kyle Kendrick doing from mid-2012 to mid-2013? How did he pitch like an ace for those 172 innings compared to the intense struggles in the other 169+ innings?

Without going into game tape, I certainly don't have the answer, though the BABIP column may provide some insight. Kendrick's career BABIP is .289. When he was pitcher A, his BABIP was .050 higher than his usual; when he was pitcher B, his BABIP was .033 lower than usual. So was he just luckier than normal for 172 consecutive innings from mid-2012 to mid-2013 and unluckier than normal for the half seasons before and after? Or was something else going on for Kendrick in those two stretches?

If the Phillies and Kendrick want to figure out a way to get a fourth top-notch pitcher on the mound following Cliff Lee, Cole HAmels, and A.J. Burnett, they need to do the work comparing these two stretches. If Kendrick was doing something from mid-2012 to mid-2013 that was different than the start of 2012 and end of 2013 (other than getting lucky), figuring it out is key.

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join The Good Phight

You must be a member of The Good Phight to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Good Phight. You should read them.

Join The Good Phight

You must be a member of The Good Phight to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Good Phight. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.