Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Diego Sanchez and the Dangers of Fame in MMA

The Aftermath of The Catch

Inspirational. Motivational. Momentum turning. Season-saving for young Gavin Floyd. All words or phrases used to describe Aaron Rowand's game-saving catch on May 11, 2006, against the Mets.

What have the games since that catch told us? That all those gushing words and phrases were crap.

Star-divide

As we all know now, on May 11, 2006, Aaron Rowand made The Catch. It surely was a great feat, saving what turned out to be a rain-shorted game. The Phils won 2-0 in five innings, and if Rowand had not made The Catch, they certainly would have been down 3-0 in the first and probably would have lost.

We were told following The Catch that Rowand showed true grit and guts and hustle and determination. No matter that he didn't play for the next few weeks; we were told that his style of play would be infectious and would inspire the rest of the team to match his abilities and step up to the challenge he posed. We were told that lazy Bobby Abreu and gimpy Pat Burrell would see how a real outfielder played defense. We were told that Gavin Floyd, the young hurler on the mound that day, would be motivated to step his game up a notch by seeing a teammate sacrifice his health for him. We were also told that the Mets would be shocked and stunned after The Catch, giving the Phils a chance to compete against them.

We were told a lot of things in the aftermath of The Catch. What we weren't told was what actually did happen: The Catch did diddly-squat for the Phils' season . . . beyond helping to win that one game.

Here's a look at how the Phils and the Mets fared before and after The Catch:

Phillies Mets
Record before 18-15 22-11
Record after 15-18 20-12
Place before 2nd (4 out) 1st
Place after 2nd (9.5 out) 1st

Before The Catch, the Phils played .545 ball; since The Catch (including The Catch game), in the same number of games, they've played .454 ball. They've lost 5.5 games to the Mets in the standings. The Mets, who were supposed to be devastated by The Catch, have kept up their pace of playing better than .600 ball, both before and after The Catch. They are, obviously, still in first place.

How about Gavin Floyd? We were told in no uncertain terms that The Catch was going to be the turning point in Floyd's season. He had pitched poorly until that point, but with Rowand's sacrifice behind him, he would be inspired to be the ace we were promised after The Catch.

ERA K/9 BB/9 HR/9
Before 6.16 5.6 5.0 2.05
After 8.75 5.7 5.7 2.66

The chart says it all. If The Catch did indeed inspire and/or motivate Gavin Floyd, it inspired and/or motivated him to pitch like a pre-Humidor Colorado Rockie and be demoted to AAA.

There's a lesson here bigger than just that the Phils have played worse after The Catch than before. It's that when baseball writers, announcers, commentators, managers, and players talk to you about inspiration, motivation, and momentum, take it for what it is: filler for airtime or column inches. It's nothing more and nothing less.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

re
great piece man
http://hugetinymistake.blogspot.com/

by pacino on Jun 16, 2006 4:17 PM EDT reply actions  

OH i see
you now censor now. great.

by Philsin06 on Jun 16, 2006 11:43 PM EDT reply actions  

you want freedom of speech
you live off freedom of speech and now you want take mine away. nice.

by Philsin06 on Jun 16, 2006 11:44 PM EDT reply actions  

What?
What are you talking about?

by David S. Cohen on Jun 17, 2006 7:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm sorry, Dave
I made a post saying how i liked Rowand, and think he is going to be a good player but somehow it got deleted. Sorry if you didnt do it.

by Philsin06 on Jun 17, 2006 8:45 AM EDT reply actions  

Nope, not me
We try to keep things civil and semi-clean here, so if the post went beyond that, someone else might have deleted it, but it wasn't me. If it was just about Rowand being good (which I agree with - he's good, not great), I don't see why it would be deleted.

Not that I believe in 100% free speech when it comes to baseball though....

by David S. Cohen on Jun 17, 2006 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

philsin06
I think in the year or so we've been doing this site, we haven't censored anyone. We certainly wouldn't do so for an opinion, whether or not we disagree with it (and we don't all agree on everything anyway).

What Dave said about Rowand. On the list of things wrong with the '06 Phils, he's either way down or not on there at all. I do wish he'd walk a bit more.

by dajafi on Jun 17, 2006 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

OK
No problem here. I made a post and somehow its missing. but i wont make a big stink. Thanks for being honest.

by Philsin06 on Jun 19, 2006 6:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.

Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

198222_nlds_reds_phillies_baseball_small FuquaManuel

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Phillyfriar__new2__small PhillyFriar

Associate Blog Lords

Bugs_small taco pal

Greg_luzinski_small Wet Luzinski

Cptjackalbatross_small RememberthePhitans

Phillies1980logo_small schmenkman

Madmen_icon_small lizroscher

Blogger Emeritus

Colevatar_small Matt Swartz