Don't Fall Asleep!
We've all been there. Watching or listening to a Phils game, the team is losing with sub-par offensive production for the first several innings. Baseball is a wonderful game, much more exciting and intriguing than its detractors believe, but sometimes, let's face it, the games can get boring. Especially when the Phils are losing and the offense is dormant. Sometimes, sleep beckons before the game is over.
But wait! In 2007, fight the temptation: Don't fall asleep while watching a Phils game!
Why not? Because the Phils are an exciting late inning offensive team. The constant droning in the media and on the airwaves about the team not being clutch might make you think that the team's bats go silent as the evening wears on, but nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the Phils are the best late innings offensive team in baseball.
Let's look at some numbers. First, we've got DFAF, a stat that the Phils lead the league in. What's DFAF? It's a new GoodPhight stat - the Don't Fall Asleep Factor. It's simple: subtract the team's OPS for innings 1 through 6 from the team's OPS for innings 7+ and get rid of the decimal point for simplicity (multiply by 1000). The higher the number, the better the team is in the late innings compared to the early innings. In other words, the higher the number, the more you're going to regret falling asleep in the middle of a game. Simple as that.
Here's the DFAF chart for all major league teams:
| Rank | TEAM | OPS | OPS 1-6 | OPS 7+ | DFAF |
| 1 | Philadelphia | 0.779 | 0.767 | 0.803 | 36 |
| 2 | LA Dodgers | 0.723 | 0.717 | 0.734 | 17 |
| 3 | Oakland | 0.729 | 0.725 | 0.738 | 13 |
| 4 | St. Louis | 0.717 | 0.717 | 0.715 | -2 |
| 5 | Florida | 0.767 | 0.768 | 0.764 | -4 |
| 6 | Atlanta | 0.739 | 0.741 | 0.735 | -6 |
| 7 | Milwaukee | 0.784 | 0.787 | 0.779 | -8 |
| 8 | Seattle | 0.759 | 0.763 | 0.750 | -13 |
| 9 | Washington | 0.680 | 0.685 | 0.672 | -13 |
| 10 | Colorado | 0.750 | 0.755 | 0.738 | -17 |
| 11 | San Diego | 0.710 | 0.718 | 0.696 | -22 |
| 12 | Toronto | 0.764 | 0.773 | 0.745 | -28 |
| 13 | Chicago Sox | 0.670 | 0.681 | 0.649 | -32 |
| 14 | NY Mets | 0.754 | 0.766 | 0.730 | -36 |
| 15 | Kansas City | 0.706 | 0.719 | 0.678 | -41 |
| 16 | Houston | 0.736 | 0.751 | 0.707 | -44 |
| 17 | Cleveland | 0.784 | 0.799 | 0.751 | -48 |
| 18 | Texas | 0.760 | 0.778 | 0.723 | -55 |
| 19 | NY Yankees | 0.799 | 0.818 | 0.762 | -56 |
| 20 | Arizona | 0.724 | 0.744 | 0.683 | -61 |
| 21 | Boston | 0.792 | 0.811 | 0.749 | -62 |
| 22 | Pittsburgh | 0.689 | 0.711 | 0.645 | -66 |
| 23 | Baltimore | 0.721 | 0.743 | 0.674 | -69 |
| 24 | San Francisco | 0.701 | 0.724 | 0.655 | -69 |
| 25 | Minnesota | 0.731 | 0.756 | 0.680 | -76 |
| 26 | Chicago Cubs | 0.749 | 0.775 | 0.698 | -77 |
| 27 | LA Angels | 0.771 | 0.801 | 0.702 | -99 |
| 28 | Tampa Bay | 0.774 | 0.818 | 0.677 | -141 |
| 29 | Cincinnati | 0.756 | 0.804 | 0.659 | -145 |
| 30 | Detroit | 0.830 | 0.881 | 0.716 | -165 |
Lest you think the Phils are so great in the later innings because they don't produce early on, here's a chart that shows the teams' rankings for each of the individual components above. The number in each column indicates the team's MLB rank for the particular stat.
| Team | OPS | OPS 1-6 | OPS 7+ | DFAF |
| Philadelphia | 6 | 13 | 1 | 1 |
| LA Dodgers | 22 | 26 | 12 | 2 |
| Oakland | 20 | 22 | 10 | 3 |
| St. Louis | 24 | 27 | 16 | 4 |
| Florida | 9 | 12 | 3 | 5 |
| Atlanta | 17 | 21 | 11 | 6 |
| Milwaukee | 4 | 8 | 2 | 7 |
| Seattle | 12 | 15 | 6 | 8 |
| Washington | 29 | 29 | 26 | 9 |
| Colorado | 15 | 17 | 9 | 10 |
| San Diego | 25 | 25 | 20 | 11 |
| Toronto | 10 | 11 | 8 | 12 |
| Chicago Sox | 30 | 30 | 29 | 13 |
| NY Mets | 14 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| Kansas City | 26 | 24 | 23 | 15 |
| Houston | 18 | 18 | 17 | 16 |
| Cleveland | 5 | 7 | 5 | 17 |
| Texas | 11 | 9 | 14 | 18 |
| NY Yankees | 2 | 2 | 4 | 19 |
| Arizona | 21 | 19 | 21 | 20 |
| Boston | 3 | 4 | 7 | 21 |
| Pittsburgh | 28 | 28 | 30 | 22 |
| Baltimore | 23 | 20 | 25 | 23 |
| San Francisco | 27 | 23 | 28 | 24 |
| Minnesota | 19 | 16 | 22 | 25 |
| Chicago Cubs | 16 | 10 | 19 | 26 |
| LA Angels | 8 | 6 | 18 | 27 |
| Tampa Bay | 7 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
| Cincinnati | 13 | 5 | 27 | 29 |
| Detroit | 1 | 1 | 15 | 30 |
The Phils have the second highest overall OPS in the NL (sixth in the majors) but are only fifth in innings 1-6 in the NL (13th in the majors). So, their offensive is powerful, but it is more sluggish in the beginnings of games.
However, after the sixth inning, wake up! The team's OPS from the seventh inning forward is tops in the majors, 24 points higher than second-place Milwaukee and 36 points higher than the Phils' own OPS in innings 1 through 6. Thus, the Phils' 36 DFAF is the highest in the majors.
Contrast the Phils' DFAF to the best offensive team in the majors. Detroit has scored 454 runs, 52 more than the second place Indians. They have the only team OPS over .800, at .830. Yet their DFAF is the worst in the majors, at -165. Detroit fans: you can feel safe going to sleep once the seventh inning hits.
But for those of us who are Phillies fans, stay awake!
[I'll continue looking into this DFAF stat for pitching and individual players over the next few weeks.]
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
by lseltzer on Jun 26, 2007 11:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
by lseltzer on Jun 26, 2007 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
by taco pal on Jun 26, 2007 12:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
Another point in Manuel's favor--as TGP commenter smitty has pointed out more than once--is that the team tends to play hard for all nine innings. They don't lay down.
Nice piece.
by dajafi on Jun 26, 2007 12:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
by David S. Cohen on Jun 26, 2007 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
by taco pal on Jun 26, 2007 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
Having worked in environments similar to the one you describe and also in the opposite type of environment I agree wholeheartedly with this.
It's pretty common in baseball history for the "in your face" type manager to achieve quick but not long lasting success and for his more laid back successor to enjoy a surge of success after the "psycho" type leaves.
Billy Martin was one of the best managers ever for achieving immediate success. But he never lasted very long. The Martin to Lemon or Durocher to Shotten or Weaver to Altobelli managerial type change often yielded very positive results. You can look it up.
Keeping the proper balance in this regard is often very difficult in baseball. That's why, with few exceptions, teams hire and fire their manager for very good reasons.
by smitty on Jun 26, 2007 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
by maxr on Jun 26, 2007 12:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Don't Fall Asleep!
I think Rollins and Abreu and Burrell and lots of other guys have all hit well late in games for several years. The "laid back" label placed on the players individually and on the club in general is a big myth in my view.
This club has given up a lot of runs over the years -- like tons. The only reason they have even been able to manage 85-88 wins per year is their amazing ability to score runs late; score runs in the immediate inning after the opposition has had a big inning; and all of the other "moxie" things they have done for several years.
by smitty on Jun 26, 2007 1:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs




















