Next Year
No, I haven't thrown in the towel yet, but I've gone into my wind-up.
Anyway, here are what I see as the main questions that team management will be faced with this offseason. Let me know if I forgot anything.
1. Do you re-sign Rowand?
I wouldn't. I think there's a good chance he's just having a contract year this year. Even if that isn't the case, I can't see him improving on this season - yet he's going to command a salary based on this season's performance. The goal is to buy low, sell high, not the other way around, and however much money Rowand's going to command on the market can be better used elsewhere. See #5 below for more.
2. Do you extend Howard?
Yes.
3. What do you do about Burrell?
I would extend him if you can get him at a reasonable price (i.e. a price lower than what he's making this year). He's actually earning his pay this year, or coming close at least. I don't think we can count on that going forward. Still, I think there's a good chance he'll sign for a reasonable price. He likes Philadelphia (who knows why, considering how he's been treated here), and he might give us a hometown discount.
4. What do you do with Myers?
I'd prefer to move him back to the rotation. But our final decision on this can be deferred until the beginning of spring training.
5. Do we re-sign anyone else?
I'd go after Werth. If Rowand leaves, Victorino + Bourn + part-time Dobbs isn't enough for CF and RF. But Victorino + Bourn + Werth + part-time Dobbs might not be so bad. Preferably, we'd re-sign Werth and pick up another decent part-timer in case Werth gets hurt again. Someone in the David Dellucci mold. Possibly Geoff Jenkins, who's a free agent (although someone out there might give Jenkins starter money).
6. Any trade possibilities?
I don't see a lot of options here. We don't really have any areas of strength to deal from. ("Lineup" is not an area of strength for trading purposes, unless you have two good hitters who play the same position. Weakening your lineup to help your pitching staff is just robbing Peter to pay Paul. We do not have more than one good player at any one position.) I'm not comfortable trading prospects right now. Our minor league system is on the rebound to some degree, but I don't think it's strong enough to raid.
7. What's our rotation going to look like next year? What free agents should we pursue?
Sadly, I think the rotation's going to be lousy again. Hamels is a stud, but he has an injury history, and you can never really count on young pitchers to stay healthy even if they don't have injury histories. Kendrick might be a flash in the pan. And those are our two strengths.
I think if we had two studs in the rotation, everything else would work itself out. We could play mix-and-match with the last three slots, and we'd be able to hold our own with our lineup. Heck, even Adam Eaton has been able to win half his starts this year, and he's the worst pitcher in the whole league. (And while acquiring Eaton was a mistake from the get-go, he's not this bad - he's just not. I've got to imagine there'll be some regression to the mean next year.) If we could count on a .750 winning percentage in 40% of the games, that would put us right on course for the postseason.
But there are no studs out there. Bartolo Colon? Curt Schilling? Jeff Weaver? Roger Clemens? Bleah.
This is why I think it would be best to move Myers back to the rotation. Myers is at least a potential stud, and we might be able to pick up a replacement closer. Francisco Cordero and Eric Gagne are flawed closers, but they'd be more acceptable as closers than Jeff Weaver would be a starter. Carlos Silva might be a decent pickup as a starter given his age and groundball ratio, but he's no stud.
So that's it. Any thoughts?
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
trades
There's also some redundancy between Carlos Ruiz and Jason Jaramillo, IMO. JJ isn't a top-tier prospect, but he looks like a serviceable MLB catcher. If the Phils love Ruiz, they should trade Jaramillo; if they don't think there's that much of a difference between the two guys but Ruiz has more value, they should trade him.
There are things they can do to improve for 2008. I figure the payroll will go up, which creates other possibilities in terms of one big free agent addition or taking on salary through trades.
Re: trades
Regarding the situation at catcher, I was hoping we might dump Helms somewhere and give Coste some more playing time at third base, which I believe was his original position. This would make room for both of our young C's. I don't feel strongly about this though.
I do think Helms will be better next year than he was this year. Even before his career year in 2006, he was generally a fairly decent hitter - much better than he's been so far in 2007. I know that contradicts what I just said above.
Re: trades
Re: Next Year
by FTN414 on Sep 13, 2007 8:31 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Next Year
Re: Next Year
by FTN414 on Sep 13, 2007 10:16 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Next Year
by perfectdepth on Sep 14, 2007 7:17 AM EDT up reply actions
Re: Next Year
by Seth @ The Good Phight on Sep 14, 2007 5:20 AM EDT reply actions
Re: Next Year
The real task, IMO, will be revamping the bullpen. They need at least 2 guys who can legitimately miss bats out there and probably more given that it'd be foolish to count on Gordon. Maybe you turn Mathieson into a reliever; maybe Happ emerges as a tough LOOGY, something the Phils haven't had recently. Even if that happens, Gillick will need to make a few savvy moves, ala the Padres, to make it all work. I don't think it's an impossible task, but it'll be tough.
by enterpsmith on Sep 14, 2007 4:05 PM EDT reply actions
Re: Next Year
On points 1-5, anyway, I'm in general agreement. Most definitely on Rowand, who's probably going to command a bad contract for the team that signs him. And the Phillies do have CF options for 2008. On Howard (and Burrell), my concern would be about how far ahead one would want to extend them, due to concerns about how they'll age.
My addition would be that I'd like to see them come up with a decent regular thirdbaseman instead of going with the scotch tape and baling wire approach.
by Dalton Bouchee on Sep 16, 2007 11:44 PM EDT reply actions

by 























