Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Next Year

No, I haven't thrown in the towel yet, but I've gone into my wind-up.

Anyway, here are what I see as the main questions that team management will be faced with this offseason. Let me know if I forgot anything.

1. Do you re-sign Rowand?

I wouldn't.  I think there's a good chance he's just having a contract year this year.  Even if that isn't the case, I can't see him improving on this season - yet he's going to command a salary based on this season's performance.  The goal is to buy low, sell high, not the other way around, and however much money Rowand's going to command on the market can be better used elsewhere.  See #5 below for more.

2. Do you extend Howard?

Yes.

3. What do you do about Burrell?

I would extend him if you can get him at a reasonable price (i.e. a price lower than what he's making this year).  He's actually earning his pay this year, or coming close at least.  I don't think we can count on that going forward.  Still, I think there's a good chance he'll sign for a reasonable price.  He likes Philadelphia (who knows why, considering how he's been treated here), and he might give us a hometown discount.

4. What do you do with Myers?

I'd prefer to move him back to the rotation.  But our final decision on this can be deferred until the beginning of spring training.

5. Do we re-sign anyone else?

I'd go after Werth.  If Rowand leaves, Victorino + Bourn + part-time Dobbs isn't enough for CF and RF.  But Victorino + Bourn + Werth + part-time Dobbs might not be so bad.  Preferably, we'd re-sign Werth and pick up another decent part-timer in case Werth gets hurt again.  Someone in the David Dellucci mold.  Possibly Geoff Jenkins, who's a free agent (although someone out there might give Jenkins starter money).

6. Any trade possibilities?

I don't see a lot of options here.  We don't really have any areas of strength to deal from.  ("Lineup" is not an area of strength for trading purposes, unless you have two good hitters who play the same position.  Weakening your lineup to help your pitching staff is just robbing Peter to pay Paul.  We do not have more than one good player at any one position.)  I'm not comfortable trading prospects right now.  Our minor league system is on the rebound to some degree, but I don't think it's strong enough to raid.

7. What's our rotation going to look like next year?  What free agents should we pursue?

Sadly, I think the rotation's going to be lousy again.  Hamels is a stud, but he has an injury history, and you can never really count on young pitchers to stay healthy even if they don't have injury histories.  Kendrick might be a flash in the pan. And those are our two strengths.

I think if we had two studs in the rotation, everything else would work itself out.  We could play mix-and-match with the last three slots, and we'd be able to hold our own with our lineup.  Heck, even Adam Eaton has been able to win half his starts this year, and he's the worst pitcher in the whole league.  (And while acquiring Eaton was a mistake from the get-go, he's not this bad - he's just not. I've got to imagine there'll be some regression to the mean next year.)  If we could count on a .750 winning percentage in 40% of the games, that would put us right on course for the postseason.

But there are no studs out there. Bartolo Colon? Curt Schilling? Jeff Weaver? Roger Clemens? Bleah.

This is why I think it would be best to move Myers back to the rotation.  Myers is at least a potential stud, and we might be able to pick up a replacement closer.  Francisco Cordero and Eric Gagne are flawed closers, but they'd be more acceptable as closers than Jeff Weaver would be a starter.  Carlos Silva might be a decent pickup as a starter given his age and groundball ratio, but he's no stud.

So that's it.  Any thoughts?

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

trades
I don't think it's that helpful to keep both Bourn and Victorino. Even if Rowand leaves, you trade one of them, start the other in CF, and let Werth/Dobbs platoon in right field. A young, fast, good-glove OF who's years away from free agency should have value. Add in a second-tier prospect or two--and we have a few of those type players now--and maybe you can bolster the pitching staff.

There's also some redundancy between Carlos Ruiz and Jason Jaramillo, IMO. JJ isn't a top-tier prospect, but he looks like a serviceable MLB catcher. If the Phils love Ruiz, they should trade Jaramillo; if they don't think there's that much of a difference between the two guys but Ruiz has more value, they should trade him.

There are things they can do to improve for 2008. I figure the payroll will go up, which creates other possibilities in terms of one big free agent addition or taking on salary through trades.

by dajafi on Sep 13, 2007 5:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: trades
These are fair points.

Regarding the situation at catcher, I was hoping we might dump Helms somewhere and give Coste some more playing time at third base, which I believe was his original position. This would make room for both of our young C's. I don't feel strongly about this though.

I do think Helms will be better next year than he was this year. Even before his career year in 2006, he was generally a fairly decent hitter - much better than he's been so far in 2007. I know that contradicts what I just said above.

by taco pal on Sep 13, 2007 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: trades
I'm actually okay with keeping Helms for the bench. He's been a very good pinch-hitter through his whole career. This year everything just went bad for him. At $2.1 million or whatever, he's an expensive reserve, but not insanely so.

by dajafi on Sep 13, 2007 5:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Next Year
I think you have to resign Rowand if you want to acquire good pitching. Resigning Lohse is one step, but by keeping Rowand, you can trade either Bourn or Victorino, whichever one brings the best starting pitcher in return. If you trade Bourn, you have Victorino/Werth in RF, which is pretty strong. If either guy gets hurt, you're left with a guy capable of playing every day.

by FTN414 on Sep 13, 2007 8:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Next Year
That's not unreasonable, but I think it's more convoluted than it needs to be. I'm not necessarily opposed to trading Bourn (though I love his game on an aesthetic level), but how much would he bring back in a trade? Certainly not a top-of-the-line pitcher, I wouldn't think. And if all you accomplish by paying Aaron Rowand an eight-figure salary is freeing up an outfielder to trade for a mid-level pitcher, why not just give the eight-figure salary directly to one of the mid-level pitchers on the free-agent market instead?

by taco pal on Sep 13, 2007 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Next Year
Signing free agents could cost a draft pick. And Bourn has more trade value than you think.

by FTN414 on Sep 13, 2007 10:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Next Year
If we let Rowand go, we'll get a draft pick to offset the one we lose.

by taco pal on Sep 13, 2007 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Next Year
Silva likely wouldn't cost a draft pick; he was Type C last year. would we get a starter better than Silva by trading Bourn? I don't think so, although I may be higher on Silva (given his GB tendencies and an AL-to-NL bump) than others.

by perfectdepth on Sep 14, 2007 7:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Next Year
Dunno about you guys, but I'm already excited for Grayson Werbbs.

by Seth @ The Good Phight on Sep 14, 2007 5:20 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Next Year
I'd support bringing Schilling back. Even with the injury this year, which he seems to be over, his peripherals, in a much more difficult division are good. Combined with moving Myers back to the rotation, you'd get a pretty nice 1-2-3. Then you have Eaton, Kendrick, Moyer, et al. compete for the last 2 rotation spots. With Garcia and Lieber coming off the books, bringing in Schilling wouldn't be contingent on a decision regarding Rowand.

The real task, IMO, will be revamping the bullpen. They need at least 2 guys who can legitimately miss bats out there and probably more given that it'd be foolish to count on Gordon. Maybe you turn Mathieson into a reliever; maybe Happ emerges as a tough LOOGY, something the Phils haven't had recently. Even if that happens, Gillick will need to make a few savvy moves, ala the Padres, to make it all work. I don't think it's an impossible task, but it'll be tough.

by enterpsmith on Sep 14, 2007 4:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Next Year
Taco Pal,

   On points 1-5, anyway, I'm in general agreement. Most definitely on Rowand, who's probably going to command a bad contract for the team that signs him. And the Phillies do have CF options for 2008. On Howard (and Burrell), my concern would be about how far ahead one would want to extend them, due to concerns about how they'll age.

     My addition would be that I'd like to see them come up with a decent regular thirdbaseman instead of going with the scotch tape and baling wire approach.    

by Dalton Bouchee on Sep 16, 2007 11:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Analysis and features focusing on Philadelphia Phillies baseball.

Blog Lords

Wholecamels_small WholeCamels

Boys_small jonk

198222_nlds_reds_phillies_baseball_small FuquaManuel

Dsc04697_small David S. Cohen

Meltingface_small dajafi

Phillyfriar__new2__small PhillyFriar

Associate Blog Lords

Bugs_small taco pal

Greg_luzinski_small Wet Luzinski

Cptjackalbatross_small RememberthePhitans

Phillies1980logo_small schmenkman

Madmen_icon_small lizroscher

Blogger Emeritus

Colevatar_small Matt Swartz