Here's something that isn't shocking - 2013 and 2014 were not good years for the Phillies. And here's something else that isn't shocking - putting a bad product on the field has translated to empty seats in the stands.
But just how bad the Phillies are doing in this latter measure is somewhat shocking. Here's the basic information about the Phillies' attendance over the past two years:
In relative terms, the Phillies' drop of almost 7000 fans at CBP per game from 2012 to 2013 is a 16% drop. The drop from 2013 to 2014 of over 7000 fans per game was even more - a 20% drop (above and beyond the 16% from the year before).
All told, in the two year period from 2012 to 2014, the Phillies lost a massive 14,097 fans per game, or 32% of their attendance. That's a huge drop.
So massive in fact, that no other team in baseball lost that much in per game attendance over the past two years. The bottom dwellers in this metric:
What's most distressing about the Phillies' drop here is that they have more wins than three of these other teams over this two year period -- 146 compared to 136 each for Chicago and Minnesota and 139 for Miami (158 for Texas). In other words, despite winning more than three of these other franchises also suffering from declining attendance, the Phillies lost a lot more fans in the seats.
Looking back even further shows just how remarkable the Phillies' two year attendance loss has been . . . and what sorry company the team keeps. Since 2004, when Citizens Bank Park opened, there have been 9 two year periods for each team, so 270 total two year periods to analyze. Of those 270, there have been only 7 drops of 30% or more.
Immediately, we can remove the Mets from 2008 to 2010, as they opened Citi Field in 2009. Shea Stadium, which closed in 2008, had a capacity of over 57,000. Citi Field's capacity is 45,000. That difference is the reason the Mets went from over 51,000 fans per game in 2008 to 32,400 in 2010.
So that leaves six different teams that have had two year drops of over 30% - the Indians, Marlins, Blue Jays, Phillies, Padres, and Astros. In and of itself, this is a bad list that the Phillies would prefer to have no part of.
Parsing this list a little further though makes it even worse. Three of the remaining six drops occurred during years that baseball overall had attendance issues. The last column shows the relative attendance change for the two years for all of baseball. The Indians, Blue Jays, and Padres suffered their attendance drops when all of baseball was suffering. (The suffering was partly because of those franchises, but not entirely - without the three in 2008 to 2010, baseball lost 4% total; without the one franchise in 2007 to 2009, baseball lost 7%.)
That puts the Phillies in truly woeful company - the 2011 and 2012 Astros and the 2005 and 2006 Marlins. The Astros in those years won just 111 games total. The Marlins in those years were better, winning 161 games, but they were the Marlins . . . a baseball team with a horrible owner playing in a terrible stadium in a community that has never embraced them.
This is the company the 2013 and 2014 Phillies are keeping with their 32% drop in attendance over the past two years. It's terrible.
But, in theory, there is a shining light - with extreme attendance losses like this come extreme revenue losses and with extreme revenue losses, again in theory, come changes to organizational philosophy.
However, with promises already to keep Ruben Amaro Jr. at the helm of this ship and to bring back all big league coaches, it's hard to be optimistic about the Phillies getting this message. In fact, barring a shocking turnaround on the field next year, it's easy to see disillusioned fans fleeing CBP even more, with another double digit drop in attendance.
Maybe then ownership will get the message?